Literature DB >> 28114613

Simulated Critical Differences for Speech Reception Thresholds.

Ellen Raben Pedersen1, Peter Møller Juhl1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Critical differences state by how much 2 test results have to differ in order to be significantly different. Critical differences for discrimination scores have been available for several decades, but they do not exist for speech reception thresholds (SRTs). This study presents and discusses how critical differences for SRTs can be estimated by Monte Carlo simulations. As an application of this method, critical differences are proposed for a 5-word sentences test (a matrix test) using 2 widely implemented adaptive test procedures. Method: For each procedure, simulations were performed for different parameters: the number of test sentences, the j factor, the distribution of the subjects' true SRTs, and the slope of the discrimination function. For 1 procedure and 1 parameter setting, simulation data are compared with results found by listening tests (experimental data).
Results: The critical differences were found to depend on the parameters tested, including interactive effects. The critical differences found by simulation agree with data found experimentally. Conclusions: As the critical differences for SRTs rely on multiple parameters, they must be determined for each parameter setting individually. However, with knowledge of the test setup, rules of thumb can be derived.

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114613     DOI: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-H-15-0445

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  2 in total

1.  Efficient Adaptive Speech Reception Threshold Measurements Using Stochastic Approximation Algorithms.

Authors:  Gertjan Dingemanse; André Goedegebure
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

2.  A Comparative Study of a Novel Adhesive Bone Conduction Device and Conventional Treatment Options for Conductive Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Piotr H Skarzynski; Anna Ratuszniak; Kamila Osinska; Magdalena Koziel; Bartlomiej Krol; Katarzyna B Cywka; Henryk Skarzynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.311

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.