Literature DB >> 28114223

Defining the Added Value of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT to Conventional Cross-Sectional Imaging in the Characterization of Enhancing Solid Renal Masses.

Sara Sheikhbahaei1, Christopher S Jones, Kristin K Porter, Steven P Rowe, Michael A Gorin, Alex S Baras, Phillip M Pierorazio, Mark W Ball, Takahiro Higuchi, Pamela T Johnson, Lilja B Solnes, Jonathan I Epstein, Mohamad E Allaf, Mehrbod S Javadi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study investigates whether the addition of preoperative Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT can increase the degree of diagnostic confidence in the differentiation of benign from malignant enhancing renal masses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were recruited as part of an institutional review board-approved prospective clinical trial. Forty-eight patients with clinical stage T1 solid renal masses who underwent a Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT before partial or radical nephrectomy were evaluated. Conventional CT and MRI, which were approximately performed within 8 weeks before Tc-MIBI, were retrospectively retrieved. Based on a 5-point scale (1 = definitely benign, 5 = definitely malignant), 2 blinded readers recorded their degree of confidence for each lesion using conventional imaging before and after reviewing the Tc-MIBI uptake ratios. Surgical pathology was considered as the reference standard.
RESULTS: Additional review of Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT uptake ratios increased diagnostic confidence in the differentiation of solid renal masses in 14/48 lesions (29.2%). In 9 lesions, the addition of Tc-MIBI changed the initial confidence levels of malignancy toward benign diagnosis. Postsurgical pathology confirmed the diagnosis of benign histology (oncocytoma/hybrid oncocytic-chromophobe tumors) in 7 and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (behave as indolent) in 2 of these lesions. Tc-MIBI increased the confidence level toward malignancy in 5 cases; all were confirmed as RCC on surgical pathology. The area under the receiver operative characteristic curve was 0.60 for conventional imaging alone and 0.85 after reviewing Tc-MIBI (P for difference = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative Tc-MIBI SPECT/CT enhances the performance of conventional imaging, improving the characterization of benign histologies and lowering the possibility of misclassification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114223     DOI: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000001534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0363-9762            Impact factor:   7.794


  6 in total

Review 1.  99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for the characterization of renal masses: a pictorial guide.

Authors:  Scott P Campbell; Antonios Tzortzakakis; Mehrbod S Javadi; Mattias Karlsson; Lilja B Solnes; Rimma Axelsson; Mohamad E Allaf; Michael A Gorin; Steven P Rowe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Validation of aorta-lesion-attenuation difference on preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan to differentiate between malignant and benign oncocytic renal tumors.

Authors:  Joseph R Grajo; Nikhil V Batra; Shahab Bozorgmehri; Laura L Magnelli; Jonathan Pavlinec; Padraic O'Malley; Li-Ming Su; Paul L Crispen
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-03-04

Review 3.  A review of 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT/CT for renal oncocytomas: A modified diagnostic algorithm.

Authors:  Mitchell P Wilson; Prayash Katlariwala; Jonathan Abele; Gavin Low
Journal:  Intractable Rare Dis Res       Date:  2022-05

Review 4.  The value of sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography in differentiating and staging renal cell carcinomas: A systematic review.

Authors:  Abdalla Ali Deb; Ayman Agag; Naufal Naushad; Rajbabu Krishnamoorthy; Hosam Serag
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2022-02-17

Review 5.  Characterizing Indeterminate Renal Masses with Molecular Imaging: the Role of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT/CT.

Authors:  Andrew M Reynolds; Kristin Kelly Porter
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Diagnostic performance of MRI, SPECT, and PET in detecting renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qihua Yin; Huiting Xu; Yanqi Zhong; Jianming Ni; Shudong Hu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.