Literature DB >> 28114106

A phenomenological relative biological effectiveness approach for proton therapy based on an improved description of the mixed radiation field.

A Mairani1, I Dokic, G Magro, T Tessonnier, J Bauer, T T Böhlen, M Ciocca, A Ferrari, P R Sala, O Jäkel, J Debus, T Haberer, A Abdollahi, K Parodi.   

Abstract

Proton therapy treatment planning systems (TPSs) are based on the assumption of a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 without taking into account the found in vitro experimental variations of the RBE as a function of tissue type, linear energy transfer (LET) and dose. The phenomenological RBE models available in literature are based on the dose-averaged LET (LET D ) as an indicator of the physical properties of the proton radiation field. The LET D values are typically calculated taking into account primary and secondary protons, neglecting the biological effect of heavier secondaries. In this work, we have introduced a phenomenological RBE approach which considers the biological effect of primary protons, and of secondary protons, deuterons, tritons (Z  =  1) and He fragments (3He and 4He, Z  =  2). The calculation framework, coupled with a Monte Carlo (MC) code, has been successfully benchmarked against clonogenic in vitro data measured in this work for two cell lines and then applied to determine biological quantities for spread-out Bragg peaks and a prostate and a head case. The introduced RBE formalism, which depends on the mixed radiation field, the dose and the ratio of the linear-quadratic model parameters for the reference radiation [Formula: see text], predicts, when integrated in an MC code, higher RBE values in comparison to LET D -based parameterizations. This effect is particular enhanced in the entrance channel of the proton field and for low [Formula: see text] tissues. For the prostate and the head case, we found higher RBE-weighted dose values up to about 5% in the entrance channel when including or neglecting the Z  =  2 secondaries in the RBE calculation. TPSs able to proper account for the mixed radiation field in proton therapy are thus recommended for an accurate determination of the RBE in the whole treatment field.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28114106     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa51f7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Proton and helium ion radiotherapy for meningioma tumors: a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning comparison.

Authors:  Thomas Tessonnier; Andrea Mairani; Wenjing Chen; Paola Sala; Francesco Cerutti; Alfredo Ferrari; Thomas Haberer; Jürgen Debus; Katia Parodi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.481

2.  Dose- rather than fluence-averaged LET should be used as a single-parameter descriptor of proton beam quality for radiochromic film dosimetry.

Authors:  Andreas Franz Resch; Paul David Heyes; Hermann Fuchs; Niels Bassler; Dietmar Georg; Hugo Palmans
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Proton beam therapy for cancer in the era of precision medicine.

Authors:  Man Hu; Liyang Jiang; Xiangli Cui; Jianguang Zhang; Jinming Yu
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-12-12       Impact factor: 17.388

4.  Biomedical Research Programs at Present and Future High-Energy Particle Accelerators.

Authors:  Vincenzo Patera; Yolanda Prezado; Faical Azaiez; Giuseppe Battistoni; Diego Bettoni; Sytze Brandenburg; Aleksandr Bugay; Giacomo Cuttone; Denis Dauvergne; Gilles de France; Christian Graeff; Thomas Haberer; Taku Inaniwa; Sebastien Incerti; Elena Nasonova; Alahari Navin; Marco Pullia; Sandro Rossi; Charlot Vandevoorde; Marco Durante
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 5.  Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  Darren M C Poon; Stephen Wu; Leon Ho; Kin Yin Cheung; Ben Yu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-13       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  The Organ Sparing Potential of Different Biological Optimization Strategies in Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Helge Henjum; Tordis J Dahle; Lars Fredrik Fjæra; Eivind Rørvik; Sara Pilskog; Camilla H Stokkevåg; Andrea Mairani; Kristian S Ytre-Hauge
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-08-17

7.  Fast robust dose calculation on GPU for high-precision 1H, 4He, 12C and 16O ion therapy: the FRoG platform.

Authors:  Stewart Mein; Kyungdon Choi; Benedikt Kopp; Thomas Tessonnier; Julia Bauer; Alfredo Ferrari; Thomas Haberer; Jürgen Debus; Amir Abdollahi; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  FRoG-A New Calculation Engine for Clinical Investigations with Proton and Carbon Ion Beams at CNAO.

Authors:  KyungDon Choi; Stewart B Mein; Benedikt Kopp; Giuseppe Magro; Silvia Molinelli; Mario Ciocca; Andrea Mairani
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.