Literature DB >> 28113734

Visually Meaningful Histopathological Features for Automatic Grading of Prostate Cancer.

M Khalid Khan Niazi, Debra L Zynger, Steven K Clinton, James Chen, Mehmet Koyuturk, Thomas LaFramboise, Metin Gurcan.   

Abstract

Histopathologic features, particularly Gleason grading system, have contributed significantly to the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of prostate cancer for decades. However, prostate cancer demonstrates enormous heterogeneity in biological behavior, thus establishing improved prognostic and predictive markers is particularly important to personalize therapy of men with clinically localized and newly diagnosed malignancy. Many automated grading systems have been developed for Gleason grading but acceptance in the medical community has been lacking due to poor interpretability. To overcome this problem, we developed a set of visually meaningful features to differentiate between low- and high-grade prostate cancer. The visually meaningful feature set consists of luminal and architectural features. For luminal features, we compute: 1) the shortest path from the nuclei to their closest luminal spaces; 2) ratio of the epithelial nuclei to the total number of nuclei. A nucleus is considered an epithelial nucleus if the shortest path between it and the luminal space does not contain any other nucleus; 3) average shortest distance of all nuclei to their closest luminal spaces. For architectural features, we compute directional changes in stroma and nuclei using directional filter banks. These features are utilized to create two subspaces; one for prostate images histopathologically assessed as low grade and the other for high grade. The grade associated with a subspace, which results in the minimum reconstruction error is considered as the prediction for the test image. For training, we utilized 43 regions of interest (ROI) images, which were extracted from 25 prostate whole slide images of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. For testing, we utilized an independent dataset of 88 ROIs extracted from 30 prostate whole slide images. The method resulted in 93.0% and 97.6% training and testing accuracies, respectively, for the spectrum of cases considered. The application of visually meaningful features provided promising levels of accuracy and consistency for grading prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28113734     DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2565515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Biomed Health Inform        ISSN: 2168-2194            Impact factor:   5.772


  4 in total

1.  Automated gleason grading on prostate biopsy slides by statistical representations of homology profile.

Authors:  Chaoyang Yan; Kazuaki Nakane; Xiangxue Wang; Yao Fu; Haoda Lu; Xiangshan Fan; Michael D Feldman; Anant Madabhushi; Jun Xu
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks.

Authors:  Pooya Mobadersany; Safoora Yousefi; Mohamed Amgad; David A Gutman; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; José E Velázquez Vega; Daniel J Brat; Lee A D Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Role of AI and Histopathological Images in Detecting Prostate Cancer: A Survey.

Authors:  Sarah M Ayyad; Mohamed Shehata; Ahmed Shalaby; Mohamed Abou El-Ghar; Mohammed Ghazal; Moumen El-Melegy; Nahla B Abdel-Hamid; Labib M Labib; H Arafat Ali; Ayman El-Baz
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Integrative Analysis of Histopathological Images and Genomic Data in Colon Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hui Li; Linyan Chen; Hao Zeng; Qimeng Liao; Jianrui Ji; Xuelei Ma
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 6.244

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.