Literature DB >> 28113312

Microbubble Composition and Preparation for High-Frequency Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Imaging: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation.

Verya Daeichin, Tom van Rooij, Ilya Skachkov, Bulent Ergin, Patricia A C Specht, Alexandre Lima, Can Ince, Johan G Bosch, Antonius F W van der Steen, Nico de Jong, Klazina Kooiman.   

Abstract

Although high-frequency ultrasound imaging is gaining attention in various applications, hardly any ultrasound contrast agents (UCAs) dedicated to such frequencies (>15 MHz) are available for contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging. Moreover, the composition of the limited commercially available UCAs for high-frequency CEUS (hfCEUS) is largely unknown, while shell properties have been shown to be an important factor for their performance. The aim of our study was to produce UCAs in-house for hfCEUS. Twelve different UCA formulations A-L were made by either sonication or mechanical agitation. The gas core consisted of C4F10 and the main coating lipid was either 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC; A-F formulation) or 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DPPC; G-L formulation). Mechanical agitation resulted in UCAs with smaller microbubbles (number weighted mean diameter ~1 [Formula: see text]) than sonication (number weighted mean diameter ~2 [Formula: see text]). UCA formulations with similar size distributions but different main lipid components showed that the DPPC-based UCA formulations had higher nonlinear responses at both the fundamental and subharmonic frequencies in vitro for hfCEUS using the Vevo2100 high-frequency preclinical scanner (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). In addition, UCA formulations F (DSPC-based) and L (DPPC-based) that were made by mechanical agitation performed similar in vitro to the commercially available Target-Ready MicroMarker (FUJIFILM VisualSonics, Inc.). UCA formulation F also performed similar to Target-Ready MicroMarker in vivo in pigs with similar mean contrast intensity within the kidney ( n = 7 ), but formulation L did not. This is likely due to the lower stability of formulation L in vivo. Our study shows that DSPC-based microbubbles produced by mechanical agitation resulted in small microbubbles with high nonlinear responses suitable for hfCEUS imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28113312     DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2640342

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  8 in total

1.  Laser-Activated Polymeric Microcapsules for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: In Vitro Feasibility.

Authors:  Guillaume Lajoinie; Tom van Rooij; Ilya Skachkov; Emilie Blazejewski; Gert Veldhuis; Nico de Jong; Klazina Kooiman; Michel Versluis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Spontaneous Nucleation of Stable Perfluorocarbon Emulsions for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  David S Li; Sarah Schneewind; Matthew Bruce; Zin Khaing; Matthew O'Donnell; Lilo Pozzo
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 11.189

3.  Development of Preclinical Ultrasound Imaging Techniques to Identify and Image Sentinel Lymph Nodes in a Cancerous Animal Model.

Authors:  Marion Bacou; Vidya Rajasekaran; Adrian Thomson; Sandra Sjöstrand; Katarzyna Kaczmarek; Anna Maria Ochocka-Fox; Adam D Gerrard; Susan Moug; Tomas Jansson; Helen Mulvana; Carmel M Moran; Susan M Farrington
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 6.639

4.  Value of combining dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound and optoacoustic tomography for hypoxia imaging.

Authors:  Anant Shah; Nigel Bush; Gary Box; Suzanne Eccles; Jeffrey Bamber
Journal:  Photoacoustics       Date:  2017-09-07

5.  Ligand Distribution and Lipid Phase Behavior in Phospholipid-Coated Microbubbles and Monolayers.

Authors:  Simone A G Langeveld; Christian Schwieger; Inés Beekers; Jacob Blaffert; Tom van Rooij; Alfred Blume; Klazina Kooiman
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.882

6.  Toward Precisely Controllable Acoustic Response of Shell-Stabilized Nanobubbles: High Yield and Narrow Dispersity.

Authors:  Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Al C de Leon; Richard Lee; Michaela Cooley; Eric C Abenojar; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 15.881

Review 7.  Nanomaterials as Ultrasound Theragnostic Tools for Heart Disease Treatment/Diagnosis.

Authors:  Edouard Alphandéry
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  MicroRNAs in Valvular Heart Diseases: Biological Regulators, Prognostic Markers and Therapeutical Targets.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Adelaide Iervolino; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Massimo Chello
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 5.923

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.