Literature DB >> 28113040

Endoscopic Versus Open Excision of Os Trigonum for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Syndrome in an Athletic Population: A Randomized Controlled Study With 5-Year Follow-up.

Dimitrios Georgiannos1, Ilias Bisbinas1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Open surgical excision of the os trigonum has been the traditional treatment for posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS). However, the endoscopic excision has recently become quite popular. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of our study was to compare the results of endoscopic versus open excision of a symptomatic os trigonum for the treatment of PAIS in an athletic population. It was hypothesized that the endoscopic technique would be superior to the open technique regarding functional outcomes, pain, and time to return to training and the previous sports level. STUDY
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.
METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, 52 athletes underwent a symptomatic os trigonum excision; 26 athletes had an open procedure (group A) and 26 had an endoscopic procedure (group B). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) hindfoot score and the Visual Analog Score-Foot and Ankle (VAS-FA) were obtained, and the time to return to training and to previous sports level was recorded.
RESULTS: Patients in group B appeared to have significant improvement of AOFAS hindfoot score compared with those in group A ( P < .05), whereas no statistical significance was found for the postoperative VAS-FA scores between the 2 groups. The mean ± SD time to return to training was 9.58 ± 3.98 weeks for group A and 4.58 ± 1.47 weeks for group B ( P < .001). The time to return to previous sports level was 11.54 ± 3.89 weeks for group A and 7.12 ± 2.25 weeks for group B ( P < .001). The overall complication rate was 23% for group A (6 cases) and 3.8% for group B (1 case).
CONCLUSION: Both the open procedure and the endoscopic approach yielded acceptable outcomes in terms of function and pain. However, complication rates were remarkably lower with endoscopic treatment, and the time to return to full activities was much shorter. Endoscopic excision of the os trigonum is a safe and effective treatment option for athletes who require early return to their previous sports level.

Entities:  

Keywords:  os trigonum; posterior ankle endoscopy; posterior ankle impingement syndrome (PAIS); sports injuries; surgical treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28113040     DOI: 10.1177/0363546516682498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  9 in total

1.  Delayed diagnosis of posterior ankle impingement in pediatric and adolescent patients: does radiology play a role?

Authors:  Indranil Kushare; Matthew G Ditzler; Siddharth P Jadhav
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-11-09

2.  The double posteromedial portals endoscopy for posterior ankle impingement syndrome in athletes.

Authors:  Nicola Maffulli; Rocco Aicale; Filippo Migliorini; Emilio Wagner; Amol Saxena; Francesco Oliva
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2022-07-06

3.  Arthroscopic Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Syndrome: Mid-Term Clinical Results and a Learning Curve.

Authors:  Kazuya Sugimoto; Shinji Isomoto; Norihiro Samoto; Tomohiro Matsui; Yasuhito Tanaka
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-15

4.  Talar Body Fracture Treated by Hindfoot Endoscopic Reduction and Internal Fixation.

Authors:  Airi Shimmyo; Shota Morimoto; Toshiya Tachibana; Tomoya Iseki
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2022-05-16

5.  Endoscopic Approach to Proximal Hamstring Avulsion Repair.

Authors:  Sunikom Suppauksorn; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Edward C Beck; Kelechi R Okoroha; Shane J Nho
Journal:  JBJS Essent Surg Tech       Date:  2020-12-24

6.  Improved Clinical Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction of In-Office Needle Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement.

Authors:  Nathaniel P Mercer; Alan P Samsonov; John F Dankert; Arianna L Gianakos; Tobias Stornebrink; Rick J Delmonte; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-08

7.  Endoscopic Treatment of Posterior Ankle Impingement Secondary to Os Trigonum in Recreational Athletes.

Authors:  Dimitrios Nikolopoulos; George Safos; Konstantinos Moustakas; Neoptolemos Sergides; Petros Safos; Athanasios Siderakis; Dimitrios Kalpaxis; Andreas Moutsios-Rentzos
Journal:  Foot Ankle Orthop       Date:  2020-09-23

8.  Effect of Bone Resection on Posterior Talofibular Ligament Integrity for Posterior Ankle Impingement Syndrome: A Cadaveric Study.

Authors:  Chirapat Inchai; Tanawat Vaseenon; Yasuhito Tanaka; Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-11

9.  Combined anterior and posterior ankle impingement syndrome with nonunion of Cedell fracture in a 58-year-old female: a case report.

Authors:  De-An Qin; Zhi-Zhen Jin; Jie-Fu Song
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-08-18       Impact factor: 2.362

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.