Literature DB >> 28112093

Surveillance of healthcare-associated infection in hospitalised South African children: Which method performs best?

A Dramowski1, M F Cotton, A Whitelaw.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2012, the South African (SA) National Department of Health mandated surveillance of healthcare-associated infection (HAI), but made no recommendations of appropriate surveillance methods.
METHODS: Prospective clinical HAI surveillance (the reference method) was conducted at Tygerberg Children's Hospital, Cape Town, from 1 May to 31 October 2015. Performance of three surveillance methods (point prevalence surveys (PPSs), laboratory surveillance and tracking of antimicrobial prescriptions) was compared with the reference method using surveillance evaluation guidelines. Factors associated with failure to detect HAI were identified by logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The reference method detected 417 HAIs among 1 347 paediatric hospitalisations (HAI incidence of 31/1000 patient days; 95% confidence interval (CI) 28.2 - 34.2). Surveillance methods had variable sensitivity (S) and positive predictive value (PPV): PPS S = 24.9% (95% CI 21 - 29.3), PPV = 100%; laboratory surveillance S = 48.4% (95% CI 43.7 - 53.2), PPV = 55.2% (95% CI 50.1 - 60.2); and antimicrobial prescriptions S = 66.4% (95% CI 61.8 - 70.8%), PPV = 88.5% (95% CI 84.5 - 91.6). Combined laboratory-antimicrobial surveillance achieved superior HAI detection (S = 84.7% (95% CI 80.9 - 87.8%), PPV = 97% (95% CI 94.6 - 98.4%)). Factors associated with failure to detect HAI included patient transfer (odds ratio (OR) 2.0), single HAI event (OR 2.8), age category 1 - 5 years (OR 2.1) and hospitalisation in a general ward (OR 2.3).
CONCLUSIONS: Repeated PPSs, laboratory surveillance and/or antimicrobial prescription tracking are feasible HAI surveillance methods for low-resource settings. Combined laboratory-antimicrobial surveillance achieved the best sensitivity and PPV. SA paediatric healthcare facilities should individualise HAI surveillance, selecting a method suited to available resources and practice context.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28112093     DOI: 10.7196/SAMJ.2016.v107.i1.11431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  S Afr Med J


  5 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare-Associated Infection Prevention Interventions for Neonates in Resource-Limited Settings.

Authors:  Angela Dramowski; Marina Aucamp; Emily Beales; Adrie Bekker; Mark Frederic Cotton; Felicity C Fitzgerald; Appiah-Korang Labi; Neal Russell; Jonathan Strysko; Andrew Whitelaw; Susan Coffin
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-07       Impact factor: 3.569

2.  Risk Factors for Candida Infection among Children Admitted to a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in a Tertiary Care Centre in Southern India.

Authors:  Raja Rajeshwari; Siva Vyasam; Jolly Chandran; Sanketh Porwal; Kala Ebenezer; Muniya Thokchom; Ebor J James; Reka Karuppusami
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-06

3.  Early warning for healthcare acquired infections in neonatal care units in a low-resource setting using routinely collected hospital data: The experience from Haiti, 2014-2018.

Authors:  Annick Lenglet; Omar Contigiani; Cono Ariti; Estivern Evens; Kessianne Charles; Carl-Frédéric Casimir; Rodnie Senat Delva; Colette Badjo; Harriet Roggeveen; Barbara Pawulska; Kate Clezy; Melissa McRae; Heiman Wertheim; Joost Hopman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Reframing infection control approaches in low-resource health care settings: A nod to the emic perspective.

Authors:  Samantha J Sadler; Anthony T Fuller
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 4.413

Review 5.  Health Care-Acquired Infections in Low- and Middle-Income Countries and the Role of Infection Prevention and Control.

Authors:  Gina Maki; Marcus Zervos
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2021-09       Impact factor: 5.982

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.