Literature DB >> 28111924

Awareness of cord blood collection and the impact on banking.

Rusha Bhandari1, Amy Lindley2, Deepika Bhatla2, Aleksandar Babic2,3, Kathy Mueckl3, Rakesh Rao1,4, Paula Brooks4, Vicki Geiler3, Gilad Gross5, Mohamad Al-Hosni2,5, Shalini Shenoy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) is an important source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation especially in minority populations with limited chances of finding a histocompatible volunteer donor in the registry. UCB has the advantages of early availability, successful outcomes despite some histocompatibility mismatch, and low incidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease. Public cord blood banks that disseminate UCB products for transplant depend on voluntary donation at participating hospitals and obstetrical providers for collection. PROCEDURE: Using survey questionnaires, we evaluated attitudes toward UCB donation, the frequency of donation, and provider opinions on UCB collection in the greater St. Louis metropolitan area that caters to minority ethnicities in significant numbers.
RESULTS: Our data suggest that nervousness and lack of information regarding the donation and utility of the product were ubiquitous reasons for not donating. Additionally, irrespective of age or level of education, women relied on healthcare providers for information regarding UCB donation. Providers reported primarily time constraints to discussing UCB donation at prenatal visits (54%). Of the interviewees, 62% donated UCB. Fallout due to refusal or preferring private banking was miniscule.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that dedicated personnel focused on disseminating information, obtaining consent, and collecting the UCB product at major hospitals can enrich cord blood banks especially with minority cords. Sustained and focused efforts could improve upon a relatively high wastage rate and ensure a robust supply of UCB products at local public banks.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cord blood banks; umbilical cord blood

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111924     DOI: 10.1002/pbc.26412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Blood Cancer        ISSN: 1545-5009            Impact factor:   3.167


  4 in total

Review 1.  Cord Blood Banking for Potential Future Transplantation.

Authors:  William T Shearer; Bertram H Lubin; Mitchell S Cairo; Luigi D Notarangelo
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 2.  Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Bioethical Lens.

Authors:  Arcangelo Liso; Margherita Neri; Francesca Maglietta; Raffaele La Russa; Emanuela Turillazzi
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.443

3.  Women's attitude towards umbilical cord blood banking in Poland.

Authors:  Agata Pisula; Agnieszka Sienicka; Karolina Stachyra; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Paweł Bartnik; Agnieszka Dobrowolska-Redo; Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Determinants of the intention to donate umbilical cord blood in pregnant women.

Authors:  Mariana Fernandes; Guido Alessandri; Rubi Abbad; Caterina Grano
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 2.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.