Literature DB >> 28111836

Differences between pH of indwelling sensors and the pH of fluid and solid phase in the rumen of dairy cows fed varying concentrate levels.

V Neubauer1,2, E Humer1, I Kröger1, T Braid1, M Wagner2, Q Zebeli1.   

Abstract

Feeding of high-concentrate diets to cattle increases the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA). Indwelling wireless pH sensors have become popular as an early diagnostic tool for SARA recently. However, the recommended pH thresholds of SARA derive from measurements taken from free-rumen liquid (FRL) in the ventral rumen, and not from the reticulum, where the mentioned sensors are located. The aim of this study was to evaluate commercially available indwelling pH boli for the accuracy and precision in predicting ruminal pH of FRL and the particle-associated rumen liquid (PARL) under varying dietary concentrate levels. An additional aim was to define SARA pH thresholds of indwelled pH boli, which can be used for SARA diagnostics. The experiment was conducted with eight nonlactating rumen cannulated Holstein cows fed 0% or 65% concentrate. Data showed that the mean pH of indwelled boli was consistently higher than in FRL and PARL (pH 6.62 ± 0.02, 6.43 ± 0.02 and 6.18 ±0.02, respectively) across feeding regimens. Interestingly, the diurnal differences in pH among indwelled boli, FRL and PARL became greater during concentrate feeding, especially at 8 h after the morning feeding, suggesting that with high-concentrate diets a particular adjustment of reticular sensor pH vs. ruminal pH in FRL and PARL is needed. The concordance correlation coefficient analysis, representing the reproducibility of the bolus measurements, was high for bolus-FRL (0.733) and moderate for bolus-PARL (0.510) associations. Furthermore, the quantitative relationship of the pH in FRL and PARL to the pH of the boli was described by linear regression analysis. The study determined that the common SARA threshold of pH 5.8 in FRL corresponds to a bolus pH of 6.0.
© 2017 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dairy cow; reticular pH; ruminal pH; subacute rumen acidosis; wireless pH measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111836     DOI: 10.1111/jpn.12675

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl)        ISSN: 0931-2439            Impact factor:   2.130


  5 in total

1.  Supplementation of a clay mineral-based product modulates plasma metabolomic profile and liver enzymes in cattle fed grain-rich diets.

Authors:  E Humer; I Kröger; V Neubauer; N Reisinger; Q Zebeli
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Evaluation of ruminal motility using an indwelling 3-axis accelerometer in the reticulum in cattle.

Authors:  Woojae Choi; Younghye Ro; Leegon Hong; Sunmin Ahn; Heejin Kim; Changhyuk Choi; Hakseung Kim; Danil Kim
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 1.267

3.  A Systematic Review on Commercially Available and Validated Sensor Technologies for Welfare Assessment of Dairy Cattle.

Authors:  Anna H Stygar; Yaneth Gómez; Greta V Berteselli; Emanuela Dalla Costa; Elisabetta Canali; Jarkko K Niemi; Pol Llonch; Matti Pastell
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-03-29

4.  Metabolism of Zearalenone in the Rumen of Dairy Cows with and without Application of a Zearalenone-Degrading Enzyme.

Authors:  Christiane Gruber-Dorninger; Johannes Faas; Barbara Doupovec; Markus Aleschko; Christian Stoiber; Andreas Höbartner-Gußl; Karin Schöndorfer; Manuela Killinger; Qendrim Zebeli; Dian Schatzmayr
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Susceptibility of dairy cows to subacute ruminal acidosis is reflected in both prepartum and postpartum bacteria as well as odd- and branched-chain fatty acids in feces.

Authors:  Hong Yang; Stijn Heirbaut; Xiaoping Jing; Nympha De Neve; Leen Vandaele; Jeyamalar Jeyanathan; Veerle Fievez
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-05
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.