Michelle C Feng1, Margaret R Murphy2, Michelle Mlinac2. 1. Executive Mental Health, Los Angeles, California, USA. 2. VA Boston Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This article describes results of a quality improvement project review of 5 years of capacity evaluations for independent living conducted in one Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Program. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients evaluated for independent living capacity through the Boston VA HBPC Program (N = 25) to identify differences in outcomes for those with and without capacity. Descriptive information included referral sources, capacity decisions, time remaining in the home, and trajectory of patients following evaluation. RESULTS: All patients evaluated had been diagnosed with a cognitive disorder, and on average, a relatively lower prevalence of mental illness compared with the national HBPC population. Referrals were made primarily by the HBPC team. Patients with capacity were found to have remained in their home longer than those who lacked capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Referral for a higher level of care was typically only recommended when no further intervention could be implemented and active risk in the home could not be managed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In home capacity evaluations are complex and challenging, yet results help family and HBPC team support patients' preferences for staying in their own home as long as possible.
OBJECTIVES: This article describes results of a quality improvement project review of 5 years of capacity evaluations for independent living conducted in one Home-Based Primary Care (HBPC) Program. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients evaluated for independent living capacity through the Boston VA HBPC Program (N = 25) to identify differences in outcomes for those with and without capacity. Descriptive information included referral sources, capacity decisions, time remaining in the home, and trajectory of patients following evaluation. RESULTS: All patients evaluated had been diagnosed with a cognitive disorder, and on average, a relatively lower prevalence of mental illness compared with the national HBPC population. Referrals were made primarily by the HBPC team. Patients with capacity were found to have remained in their home longer than those who lacked capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Referral for a higher level of care was typically only recommended when no further intervention could be implemented and active risk in the home could not be managed. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In home capacity evaluations are complex and challenging, yet results help family and HBPC team support patients' preferences for staying in their own home as long as possible.
Authors: Jennifer M Reckrey; Theresa A Soriano; Cameron R Hernandez; Linda V DeCherrie; Silvia Chavez; Meng Zhang; Katherine Ornstein Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2015-01-30 Impact factor: 5.562