Literature DB >> 28111193

Impact of Continuous Evaluation of Technology and Therapy: 30 Years of Research Reduces Stroke and Mortality from Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.

Charles P Shahan1, Martin A Croce1, Timothy C Fabian1, Louis J Magnotti2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) was underdiagnosed until the 1990s when blunt carotid injuries were found to be more common than historically described. Technological advancements and regionalization of trauma care have resulted in increased screening and improved diagnosis of BCVI. The aim of this study was to demonstrate that systematic evaluation of the screening and diagnosis of BCVI, combined with early and aggressive treatment, have led to reductions in BCVI-related stroke and mortality. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients with BCVI from 1985 to 2015 were identified and stratified by age, sex, and Injury Severity Score. BCVI-related stroke and mortality rates were then calculated and compared. Patients were divided into 5 eras based on changes in technology, screening, or treatment algorithms at our institution.
RESULTS: Five hundred and sixty-four patients were diagnosed with BCVI: 508 carotid artery and 267 vertebral artery injuries. Sixty-five percent of patients were male, mean age was 41 years, and mean Injury Severity Score was 27. Incidence of BCVI diagnosis increased from 0.33% to approximately 2% of all blunt trauma (p < 0.001) during the study period. Ninety (14%) patients suffered BCVI-related stroke, with the incidence of stroke significantly decreasing over time from 37% to 5% (p < 0.001). Twenty-eight (5%) patients died as a direct result of BCVI, and BCVI-related mortality also decreased significantly over time from 24% to 0% (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although increased screening has resulted in a higher incidence of injuries over time, BCVI-related stroke and mortality have decreased significantly. Continuous critical evaluation of evolving technology and diagnostic and treatment algorithms has contributed substantially to those improved outcomes. Appraisals of technological advances, preferably through prospective multi-institutional studies, should advance our understanding of these injuries and lead to even lower stroke rates.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28111193     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  4 in total

1.  Blunt Cerebrovascular Artery Injury and Stroke in Severely Injured Patients: An International Multicenter Analysis.

Authors:  Christian D Weber; Rolf Lefering; Philipp Kobbe; Klemens Horst; Miguel Pishnamaz; Richard M Sellei; Frank Hildebrand; Hans-Christoph Pape
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Management of Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury.

Authors:  David K Stone; Vyas T Viswanathan; Christina A Wilson
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 5.081

3.  Different strokes: differences in the characteristics and outcomes of BCVI and non-BCVI strokes in trauma patients.

Authors:  Michelle K McNutt; Cedar Slovacek; David Rosenbaum; Hari Kishan Reddy Indupuru; Xu Zhang; Bryan A Cotton; John Harvin; Charles E Wade; Sean I Savitz; Lillian S Kao
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2020-09-15

4.  Blunt cerebrovascular injury in elderly fall patients: are we screening enough?

Authors:  Vincent P Anto; Joshua B Brown; Andrew B Peitzman; Brian S Zuckerbraun; Matthew D Neal; Gregory Watson; Raquel Forsythe; Timothy R Billiar; Jason L Sperry
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 5.469

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.