Literature DB >> 28111123

Preparation of the Femoral Bone Cavity for Cementless Stems: Broaching vs Compaction. A Five-Year Randomized Radiostereometric Analysis and Dual Energy X-Ray Absorption Study.

Mette H Hjorth1, Søren Kold2, Kjeld Søballe1, Bente L Langdahl3, Poul T Nielsen2, Poul H Christensen2, Maiken Stilling1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Short-term experimental and animal studies have confirmed superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone.
METHODS: Forty-four hips in 42 patients (19 men) were randomly operated using cementless hydroxyapatite-coated Bi-Metric stems. Patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis at baseline, 6 and 12 weeks, 1, 2, and 5 years, and measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density at baseline, 1, 2, and 5 years. Complications during the study period and clinical outcome measures of Harris Hip Score were recorded at mean 7 years (5-8.8) after surgery.
RESULTS: Absolute migrations of medio/lateral translations between the broaching group and the compaction group of mean 0.14 mm (standard deviation [SD] 0.10) vs mean 0.30 mm (SD 0.27) (P = .01) at 1 year, and of mean 0.13 mm (SD 0.10) vs 0.34 mm (0.31) (P = .01) at 5 years were different. Absolute valgus/varus rotations of mean 0.12° (SD 0.13°) in the broaching group were less than mean 0.35° (0.45°) in the compaction group (P < .01) at 1 year, but at 5 years no difference was observed (P = .19). Subsidence and retroversion were similar between groups at all follow-ups (P > .13). The compaction group had significantly less bone loss than the broaching group in Gruen zone 3 (distal-lateral to the stem) at 1 and 5 years. No further differences in bone mineral density changes were found between groups up to 5 years after surgery. Complications throughout the period and clinical outcome measures of Harris Hip Score were similar at 7 years (5-8.8) after surgery.
CONCLUSION: We found increased migration when preparing the bone with compaction compared with broaching in cementless femoral stems.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  broaching; cementless femoral stem; compaction; dual X-ray energy absorption; femoral bone preparation technique; radiostereometric analyses

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28111123     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.12.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  3 in total

1.  Ten-year comparison of two different techniques for femoral bone cavity preparation-broaching versus compaction in patients with cementless total hip arthroplasty : a randomized radiostereometric study of 30 total hip arthroplasties in 15 patients operated bilaterally.

Authors:  Maciej Okowinski; Mette Holm Hjorth; Sebastian Breddam Mosegaard; Jonathan Hugo Jürgens-Lahnstein; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen; Poul Hedevang Christensen; Søren Kold; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2021-12

2.  Influence of femoral broach shape on stem alignment using anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: A radiologic comparative study of 3 different stems.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Camdon Fary; Elvire Servien; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  The correlation between activity level, serum-ion concentrations and pseudotumours in patients with metal-on-metal hip articulations and metal-on-polyethylene total hip articulations.

Authors:  Mette Holm Hjorth; Inger Mechlenburg; Kjeld Soballe; Lone Roemer; Maiken Stilling
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 5.191

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.