| Literature DB >> 28110784 |
Ben M Hause1, Lucas Huntimer2, Shollie Falkenberg2, Jamie Henningson3, Kelly Lechtenberg4, Tom Halbur2.
Abstract
Originally isolated from swine, the proposed influenza D virus has since been shown to be common in cattle. Inoculation of IDV to naïve calves resulted in mild respiratory disease histologically characterized by tracheitis. As several studies have associated the presence of IDV with acute bovine respiratory disease (BRD), we sought to investigate the efficacy of an inactivated IDV vaccine. Vaccinated calves seroconverted with hemagglutination inhibition titers 137-169 following two doses. Non-vaccinated calves challenged with a homologous virus exhibited signs of mild respiratory disease from days four to ten post challenge which was significantly different than negative controls at days five and nine post challenge. Peak viral shedding of approximately 5 TCID50/mL was measured in nasal and tracheal swabs and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids four to six days post challenge. Viral titers were significantly (P<0.05) decreased 1.4 TCID50/mL, 3.6 TCID50/mL and 5.0 TCID50/mL, respectively, in the aforementioned samples collected from vaccinated animals compared to non-vaccinated controls at peak shedding. Viral antigen was detected in the respiratory epithelium of the nasal turbinates and trachea by immunohistochemistry from all unvaccinated calves but in significantly fewer vaccinates. Inflammation characterized by neutrophils was observed in the nasal turbinate and trachea but not appreciably in lungs. Together these results support an etiologic role for IDV in BRD and demonstrate that partial protection is afforded by an inactivated vaccine.Entities:
Keywords: Bovine; Influenza; Pathogenesis; Respiratory disease; Vaccine
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28110784 PMCID: PMC7117347 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.12.024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vet Microbiol ISSN: 0378-1135 Impact factor: 3.293
Log 2-transformed hemagglutination inhibition titers and standard deviation in calf sera. Treatment groups T1 and T3 received at inactivated vaccine on days 0 and 14. Treatment groups T2 and T3 were challenged with a homologous virus on day 35. Different letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups within a column. Groups with the same letter indicate no difference between them.
| Treatment Group | Day 0 | Day 14 | Day 21 | Day 28 | Day 35 | Day 42 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (n = 15) | 4.7 ± 0.5 A | 5.7 ± 0.6A | 6.9 ± 1.1A | 7.1 ± 1.3A | 7.1 ± 1.2A | 7.1 ± 0.8A |
| T2 (n = 25) | 4.7 ± 0.5 A | 5.2 ± 0.3B | 4.5 ± 0.4B | 4.9 ± 0.5B | 5.0 ± 0.5B | 5.3 ± 0.0B |
| T3 (n = 25) | 4.7 ± 0.5 A | 5.5 ± 0.5AB | 6.7 ± 0.9A | 7.3 ± 1.0A | 7.4 ± 0.9A | 8.0 ± 1.1A |
n, number of calves.
Mean composite clinical score for calves challenged with IDV on day 35. Calves were assigned a 0–4 score (0 = normal, 4 = severe) separately for depression, body condition and respiratory distress. A mean composite clinical score was calculated by the summation of the depression, body condition and respiratory distress scores for each treatment group on each day divided by the number of calves in the treatment group. Different letters (A, B, C) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups within a column. Groups with the same letter indicate no difference between them.
| Treatment Group | Day 35 | Day 36 | Day 37 | Day 38 | Day 39 | Day 40 | Day 41 | Day 42 | Day 43 | Day 44 | Day 45 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | 0.0 ± 0.0 A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A |
| T2 | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.2A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.1 ± 0.2A | 0.5 ± 0.6 B | 0.5 ± 0.5AB | 0.3 ± 0.5A | 0.3 ± 0.5A | 1.0 ± 0.0B | 0.6 ± 0.5A |
| T3 | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.2A | 0.0± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.0 ± 0.0A | 0.3 ± 0.5 AB | 0.5 ± 0.5 B | 0.2 ± 0.4 A | 0.4 ± 0.5A | 0.4 ± 0.5AB | 0.6 ± 0.5A |
Fig. 1Influenza D virus titers in (a) nasal swabs, (b) tracheal swabs, and (c) bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. Calves in treatment group T1 received vaccine only while those in T2 were only challenged with IDV on day 35 post vaccination. Calves in T3 were both vaccinated and challenged. Different letters (A–C) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups at that time point. Groups with the same letter indicate no difference between them. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).
Fig. 2IDV antigen staining from nasal turbinate and trachea of each treatment group. (A). Negative staining in nasal turbinate respiratory epithelium from a calf in T1. (B) Negative staining in tracheal epithelium from a calf in T1. (C) Positive intense cytoplasmic staining in nasal turbinate respiratory epithelium from a calf in T2. (D) Positive intense cytoplasmic staining in trachea respiratory epithelium from a calf in T2. (E) Negative staining in nasal turbinate respiratory epithelium from a calf in T3. Nasal turbinates from all calves in group 3 were negative. (F) Positive intense cytoplasmic staining in trachea respiratory epithelium from a calf in T3. In all figures, A–E, the antibody polyclonal produced some non-specific background staining in the blood vessels of the submucosa and in (B) which has some non-specific staining in the cilia and mucous layer of the respiratory epithelium. All figures taken at 200× magnification.
Fig. 3Percentage of calves positive for influenza D virus by immunohistochemistry of (a) nasal turbinate, and (b) trachea. Calves in treatment group T1 received vaccine only while those in T2 were only challenged with IDV on day 35 post vaccination. Calves in T3 were both vaccinated and challenged. Different letters (A, B) indicate significant differences (p ≤ 0.05) between groups at each time point. Groups with the same letter indicate no difference between them. Error bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).