Elisha Riggs1,2, Sumaiya Muyeen1, Stephanie Brown1,2,3, Wendy Dawson1, Pauline Petschel4, Waan Tardiff4,5, Fiona Norman6, Dannielle Vanpraag1, Jo Szwarc7, Jane Yelland1,2. 1. Healthy Mothers Healthy Families Research Group, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 2. General Practice and Primary Health Care Academic Centre, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 3. Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic., Australia. 4. Maternal and Child Health, Wyndham City Council, Werribee, Vic., Australia. 5. VICSEG New Futures, Coburg, Vic., Australia. 6. Department of Education and Training, State Government of Victoria, East Melbourne, Vic., Australia. 7. Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture, Brunswick, Vic., Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Refugee women experience higher incidence of childbirth complications and poor pregnancy outcomes. Resettled refugee women often face multiple barriers accessing pregnancy care and navigating health systems in high income countries. METHODS: A community-based model of group pregnancy care for Karen women from Burma was co-designed by health services in consultation with Karen families in Melbourne, Australia. Focus groups were conducted with women who had participated to explore their experiences of using the program, and whether it had helped them feel prepared for childbirth and going home with a new baby. RESULTS: Nineteen women (average time in Australia 4.3 years) participated in two focus groups. Women reported feeling empowered and confident through learning about pregnancy and childbirth in the group setting. The collective sharing of stories in the facilitated environment allowed women to feel prepared, confident and reassured, with the greatest benefits coming from storytelling with peers, and developing trusting relationships with a team of professionals, with whom women were able to communicate in their own language. Women also discussed the pivotal role of the bicultural worker in the multidisciplinary care team. Challenges in the hospital during labor and birth were reported and included lack of professional interpreters and a lack of privacy. CONCLUSION: Group pregnancy care has the potential to increase refugee background women's access to pregnancy care and information, sense of belonging, cultural safety using services, preparation for labor and birth, and care of a newborn.
BACKGROUND: Refugee women experience higher incidence of childbirth complications and poor pregnancy outcomes. Resettled refugee women often face multiple barriers accessing pregnancy care and navigating health systems in high income countries. METHODS: A community-based model of group pregnancy care for Karen women from Burma was co-designed by health services in consultation with Karen families in Melbourne, Australia. Focus groups were conducted with women who had participated to explore their experiences of using the program, and whether it had helped them feel prepared for childbirth and going home with a new baby. RESULTS: Nineteen women (average time in Australia 4.3 years) participated in two focus groups. Women reported feeling empowered and confident through learning about pregnancy and childbirth in the group setting. The collective sharing of stories in the facilitated environment allowed women to feel prepared, confident and reassured, with the greatest benefits coming from storytelling with peers, and developing trusting relationships with a team of professionals, with whom women were able to communicate in their own language. Women also discussed the pivotal role of the bicultural worker in the multidisciplinary care team. Challenges in the hospital during labor and birth were reported and included lack of professional interpreters and a lack of privacy. CONCLUSION: Group pregnancy care has the potential to increase refugee background women's access to pregnancy care and information, sense of belonging, cultural safety using services, preparation for labor and birth, and care of a newborn.
Authors: Waleed M Sweileh; Kolitha Wickramage; Kevin Pottie; Charles Hui; Bayard Roberts; Ansam F Sawalha; Saed H Zyoud Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Helen J Rogers; Lily Hogan; Dominiek Coates; Caroline S E Homer; Amanda Henry Journal: BMC Womens Health Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 2.809
Authors: Helle Johnsen; Ulla Christensen; Mette Juhl; Sarah Fredsted Villadsen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Mackenzie E Churchill; Janet K Smylie; Sara H Wolfe; Cheryllee Bourgeois; Helle Moeller; Michelle Firestone Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Elisha Riggs; Jane Yelland; Fiona K Mensah; Lisa Gold; Josef Szwarc; Ida Kaplan; Rhonda Small; Philippa Middleton; Ann Krastev; Ellie McDonald; Christine East; Caroline Homer; Natalija Nesvadba; Laura Biggs; Jeffrey Braithwaite; Stephanie J Brown Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-07-19 Impact factor: 2.692