| Literature DB >> 28109661 |
Benjamin Patterson1, Carl D Morrow2, Daniel Kohls3, Caroline Deignan3, Samuel Ginsburg4, Robin Wood2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis remains a major public health problem in poverty-stricken areas of the world. Communal gathering places account for the majority of TB transmission in high burden settings.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; GIS; Hot spot; South Africa; Transmission; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28109661 PMCID: PMC5312671 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Total Environ ISSN: 0048-9697 Impact factor: 7.963
Fig. 1Consort diagram showing the numbers of participants for analysed for the different components of the study in the three groups.
Characteristics of participants of the three sub-groups Median and Interquartile ranges given unless otherwise stated. Categorical variables were compared using the Fisher exact test and continuous variables using a t-test when parametric and a Wilcoxon rank sum test (W) when nonparametric.
| New TB | Previous TB | Adolescents | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | 12 | 24 | 58 | ||
| Age (mean (s.d.)) | 33.42 (9.51) | 34.42 (8.51) | 16.36 (2.44) | < 0.001 | |
| Sex (male %) | 8 (66.7) | 6 (25.0) | 20 (34.5) | 0.045 | |
| HIV status (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Negative | 5 (41.7) | 3 (12.5) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Positive | 7 (58.3) | 17 (70.8) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Unknown | 0 (0.0) | 4 (16.7) | 58 (100.0) | ||
| Employment or school (%) | < 0.001 | ||||
| Full time | 2 (16.7) | 9 (37.5) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| Part time | 4 (33.3) | 4 (16.7) | 0 (0.0) | ||
| School | 1 (8.3) | 2 (8.3) | 56 (96.6) | ||
| Unemployed | 5 (41.7) | 9 (37.5) | 2 (3.4) | ||
| Housing type (informal %) | 9 (75.0) | 15 (62.5) | 45 (77.6) | 0.368 | |
| Number of cohabitees (mean) | 1.50 (1.88) | 2.75 (2.82) | 3.66 (1.80) | 0.004 | |
| Number sharing room to sleep (mean) | 0.42 (0.67) | 1.17 (1.05) | 1.38 (1.17) | 0.024 | |
| Movements per day | 8.75 [6.38, 10.12] | 5.33 [4.14, 6.36] | 12.83 [9.67, 17.25] | < 0.001 | (W) |
| Sleep (hours per day) | 11.96 [10.84, 13.40] | 9.87 [8.90, 10.90] | 9.50 [8.79, 10.49] | 0.001 | (W) |
| RAV — total | 44.17 [15.15, 80.57] | 39.75 [23.38, 55.44] | 126.69 [91.02, 168.43] | < 0.001 | (W) |
| RAV — during sleep | 9.53 [0.00, 42.99] | 17.20 [0.00, 22.05] | 14.67 [3.34, 35.55] | 0.625 | (W) |
| RAV — in households | 12.38 [10.92, 26.41] | 7.72 [4.01, 13.34] | 13.69 [9.09, 29.65] | 0.044 | (W) |
| RAV — work or school | 0.00 [0.00, 0.00] | 3.14 [0.00, 13.15] | 71.26 [41.05, 103.01] | < 0.001 | (W) |
| RAV — on transport | 0.10 [0.00, 0.19] | 0.00 [0.00, 2.24] | 0.00 [0.00, 0.00] | 0.004 | (W) |
| RAV — other | 1.52 [1.18, 1.80] | 2.89 [1.84, 6.24] | 2.94 [1.76, 5.69] | 0.208 | (W) |
Fig. 2A. Comparison of the three groups in terms of proportion of the day spent at different locations.
B. Comparison of the three groups in terms of mean RAVs in litres per day.
Percentage of locations with recorded use of flame for either heating or cooking by the three groups.
| Flame Use (%) | New TB | Previous TB | Adolescent | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heating | 25 | 8.3 | 20.7 | 17.5 |
| Cooking | 16.7 | 20.8 | 22.4 | 22.0 |
| Heating | 8.3 | 0.0 | 8.6 | 6.4 |
| Cooking | 8.3 | 8.3 | 12.1 | 10.6 |
Fig. 3A. All GPS locations recorded by participants form the three groups overlaid on a map of community.
B. GPS locations with rebreathed air volumes of 100 ml/min or greater.
Fig. 4Getis-Ord-Gi* cluster analysis highlighting the school as a hot spot.