Literature DB >> 28109102

[Long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in patients aged over 75 years].

Yi Guo1, Chong-Lei Ren, Chang-Qing Gao, Cang-Song Xiao, Hua-Jun Zhang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the long-term outcomes of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) in patients aged over 75 years and analyze the risk factors affecting the outcomes of the procedure.
METHODS: Clinical data were reviewed for 97 consecutive patients aged 75 years or above receiving OPCAB at our center between November, 2000 and November, 2013. The perioperative data including length of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, incidence of postoperative complications and mortality rate of the patients were analyzed. The follow-up data of the patients were also analyzed including all-cause mortality rate and major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCE, including myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular event, and repeated revascularization).
RESULTS: The perioperative mortality rate was 3.09% (3/97) in these patients. Of the 97 patients analyzed, 91 (93%) were available for follow-up for 29-192 months (with a median of 95.61∓34.07 months). The 10-year survival rate of the patients was 62% with a 10-year MACCE-free survival rate of 47.4%. During the follow-up, 6 (6.8%) patients underwent repeated revascularization procedures, 12 (12.37%) had cerebrovascular accidents and 5 (5.15%) had myocardial infarction. Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension (OR=1.388, P=0.043) and diabetes (OR=1.692, P=0.017) were independent predictors of MACCE, and incomplete revascularization did not increase the risk of postoperative MACCE.
CONCLUSION: OPCAB is safe and effective in elderly patients with good long-term outcomes. Hypertension and diabetes are independent risk factors of MACCE, and adequate control of blood pressure and blood glucose can reduce the incidence of postoperative MACCE. Incomplete revascularization is not detrimental to the long-term outcomes of OPCAB in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28109102      PMCID: PMC6765747     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao        ISSN: 1673-4254


  19 in total

Review 1.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients aged 80 years and older: institutional results and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Vasques; Antti Rainio; Jouni Heikkinen; Reija Mikkola; Jarmo Lahtinen; Ulla Kettunen; Tatu Juvonen; Fausto Biancari
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of randomized trials for repeat revascularization following off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Yusuke Mizuno; Masao Niwa; Shin-nosuke Goto; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-07-21

3.  Early and long-term outcomes in the elderly: comparison between off-pump and on-pump techniques in 1191 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Yan Li; Zhe Zheng; Shengshou Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients.

Authors:  Anno Diegeler; Jochen Börgermann; Utz Kappert; Martin Breuer; Andreas Böning; Adrian Ursulescu; Ardawan Rastan; David Holzhey; Hendrik Treede; Friedrich-Christian Rieß; Philippe Veeckmann; Amjad Asfoor; Wilko Reents; Michael Zacher; Michael Hilker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Three-year follow-up in a subset of high-risk patients randomly assigned to off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: the Best Bypass Surgery trial.

Authors:  Christian H Møller; Mario J Perko; Jens T Lund; Lars W Andersen; Henning Kelbæk; Jan K Madsen; Per Winkel; Christian Gluud; Daniel A Steinbrüchel
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Five-year follow-up of a randomized comparison between off-pump and on-pump stable multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting. The MASS III Trial.

Authors:  Whady Hueb; Neuza H Lopes; Alexandre C Pereira; Alexandre C Hueb; Paulo Rogério Soares; Desidério Favarato; Ricardo D'Oliveira Vieira; Eduardo Gomes Lima; Cibele Larrosa Garzillo; Felipe da Silva Paulitch; Luiz A M César; Bernard J Gersh; José A F Ramires
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Benefits of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Akira Marui; Hitoshi Okabayashi; Tatsuhiko Komiya; Shiro Tanaka; Yutaka Furukawa; Toru Kita; Takeshi Kimura; Ryuzo Sakata
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  A meta-analysis of adjusted risk estimates for survival from observational studies of complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with multivessel disease undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Taku Watanabe; Yusuke Mizuno; Norikazu Kawai; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2014-02-13

9.  A comparison of off-pump and on-pump coronary bypass surgery in patients with low EuroSCORE.

Authors:  Abdulkadir Ercan; Ilker Hasan Karal; Orcun Gurbuz; Gencehan Kumtepe; Tolga Onder; Davit Saba
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery in patients older than 60 years: five-year follow-up of MASS III trial.

Authors:  Rodrigo Morel Vieira de Melo; Whady Hueb; Paulo Cury Rezende; Eduardo Gomes Lima; Alexandre Ciappina Hueb; José Antonio Franchini Ramires; Roberto Kalil Filho
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 1.637

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.