Literature DB >> 28108992

Intralesional immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy in the treatment of warts.

Fahime Khozeimeh1, Farahzad Jabbari Azad2, Yaghoub Mahboubi Oskouei2, Majid Jafari2, Shahrzad Tehranian3, Roohallah Alizadehsani4, Pouran Layegh1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Warts are the most common clinical manifestation of the human papilloma-virus infection in the skin and mucous membranes. In spite of the various therapeutic modalities for nongenital skin warts, there is still no single method to be used as an approved treatment. In this study, we compared the efficacy of immunotherapy and cryotherapy on wart lesions.
METHODS: Sixty patients with verruca vulgaris and plantar warts were randomly divided into two groups. One group received intralesional injection of candida antigen repeated every 3 weeks until complete improvement of all warts or for a maximum of three sessions. The second group was treated by cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen for a maximum of ten sessions or until clearance of all lesions. T-test and chi-square test were used for statistical analysis, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: The patients showed a significant therapeutic response to immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy (P = 0.023). Moreover, a significant difference was observed between the time-elapsed before treatment and the therapeutic response between both groups (P = 0.041). 76.7% of patients were completely cured with immunotherapy, while only 56.7% responded to cryotherapy. Complete remission was observed with fewer sessions (20.17 ± 0.65) in immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy (3.82 ± 2.481), but no statistically significant difference was shown between groups. Immunotherapy was well-tolerated except for the pain during injection that was the most common side effect.
CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional immunotherapy is an effective treatment of warts. This method has a better therapeutic response, needs fewer sessions, and is capable of treating distant warts.
© 2017 The International Society of Dermatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108992     DOI: 10.1111/ijd.13535

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Dermatol        ISSN: 0011-9059            Impact factor:   2.736


  7 in total

1.  IAPSO-AIRS: A novel improved machine learning-based system for wart disease treatment.

Authors:  Moloud Abdar; Vivi Nur Wijayaningrum; Sadiq Hussain; Roohallah Alizadehsani; Pawel Plawiak; U Rajendra Acharya; Vladimir Makarenkov
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Management of Difficult-to-Treat Warts: Traditional and New Approaches.

Authors:  Peter C Friedman
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 7.403

3.  Fractional Norms and Quasinorms Do Not Help to Overcome the Curse of Dimensionality.

Authors:  Evgeny M Mirkes; Jeza Allohibi; Alexander Gorban
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 2.524

4.  Topical 15% Zinc Oxide Ointment Significantly Reduces the Size of Common Warts After Four Weeks: A Randomized, Triple-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial.

Authors:  Chankiat Songsantiphap; Pravit Asawanonda
Journal:  J Clin Aesthet Dermatol       Date:  2019-09-01

5.  Risk prediction of cardiovascular disease using machine learning classifiers.

Authors:  Madhumita Pal; Smita Parija; Ganapati Panda; Kuldeep Dhama; Ranjan K Mohapatra
Journal:  Open Med (Wars)       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 6.  New Developments in Bacterial, Viral, and Fungal Cutaneous Infections.

Authors:  Samuel Yeroushalmi; Joshua Yoseph Shirazi; Adam Friedman
Journal:  Curr Dermatol Rep       Date:  2020-03-05

7.  Framework for the Development of Data-Driven Mamdani-Type Fuzzy Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Authors:  Yamid Fabián Hernández-Julio; Martha Janeth Prieto-Guevara; Wilson Nieto-Bernal; Inés Meriño-Fuentes; Alexander Guerrero-Avendaño
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.