Literature DB >> 28108967

Specific sites of metastases in invasive lobular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study of metastatic breast cancer.

Masayuki Inoue1, Hiroshi Nakagomi2, Haruka Nakada2, Kazushige Furuya2, Kou Ikegame2, Hideki Watanabe2, Masao Omata3,4, Toshio Oyama5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is known to be the second most common histological type following invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). Definitive clinical features of ILC are controversial.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 330 patients with metastatic breast cancer, 303 of IDC, 19 of ILC, and 8 of others. We compared the patient age and tumor-node-metastasis factors, disease-free survival (DFS), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) expression at the primary site between ILC and IDC. We then selected the patients in the ER+ or PR+/HER2- subtype specifically and compared sites of recurrence, and the survival curve starting from the point of development of metastatic disease.
RESULTS: The clinical stage was significantly higher in the ILC patients than in the IDC (p = 0.001). The mean (±SD) of DFS for the ILC and IDC patients was 2.6 ± 0.6 and 2.4 ± 0.3 years, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.18). However, the hormone receptor status was same between both groups; the rate of HER2 positivity was significantly lower in the ILC group (0%) than in the IDC group (16.2%) (p = 0.05). In ER+ or PR+/HER2- subtype, the mean DFS for the ILC and IDC was 2.9 ± 0.6 and 3.1 ± 0.3 years, and the median survival time after the recurrence for ILC and IDC patients was 4.2 ± 0.7 and 5.6 ± 0.7 years, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.77). The frequency of lung metastases was significantly lower in the ILC group (6.3%) than in the IDC group (53.7%) (p < 0.01), while the frequency of peritoneal metastases was significantly higher in the ILC group (68.8%) than in the IDC group (1%) (p = 0.00). Of note, the prognosis after the diagnosis of peritoneal metastases was poor, with a median survival time of 19 ± 9 months and resistance to hormone therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The extremely high rate (68.8%) of peritoneal metastases was observed in long-term follow-up for the metastatic breast cancer patients with ILC. We need to reveal the definitive feature of ILC and develop new therapeutic strategies to prevent the dissemination of ILCs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC); Metastatic breast cancer; Peritoneal metastases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108967     DOI: 10.1007/s12282-017-0753-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer        ISSN: 1340-6868            Impact factor:   4.239


  18 in total

1.  Distinct Pattern of Metastases in Patients with Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.

Authors:  Aju Mathew; Padma S Rajagopal; Vipin Villgran; Gurprataap S Sandhu; Rachel C Jankowitz; Mini Jacob; Margaret Rosenzweig; Steffi Oesterreich; Adam Brufsky
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Benefit of home parenteral nutrition (HPN) and chemotherapy in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma developed peritoneal metastases.

Authors:  Masayuki Inoue; Ayako Kimura; Tomomi Oka; Aya Yajima; Yudai Higuchi; Tatsuki Endo; Hideki Watanabe; Hiroshi Nakagomi
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  The 70-gene signature test as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients with invasive lobular breast cancer.

Authors:  J Asher Jenkins; Schelomo Marmor; Jane Yuet Ching Hui; Heather Beckwith; Anne H Blaes; David Potter; Todd M Tuttle
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  A Comparison of the Clinicopathological Features, Metastasis Sites and Survival Outcomes of Invasive Lobular, Invasive Ductal and Mixed Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nüvit Duraker; Semih Hot; Arzu Akan; Pınar Özay Nayır
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2020-01-01

5.  Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal metastasis from breast cancer: a preliminary report of 4 cases.

Authors:  Jun-Hui Yu; Yu Feng; Xin-Bao Li; Cheng-Yan Zhang; Feng Shi; Song-Lin An; Gang Liu; Yan-Bin Zhang; Kai Zhang; Zhong-He Ji; Bing Li; Guo-Jun Yan; Yan-Ping Li; Yan Li
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-04

6.  Clinical outcomes in patients with triple negative or HER2 positive lobular breast cancer: a single institution experience.

Authors:  Alicia Okines; Tazia Irfan; Bernice Asare; Kabir Mohammed; Peter Osin; Ashutosh Nerurkar; Ian E Smith; Marina Parton; Alistair Ring; Stephen Johnston; Nicholas C Turner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

7.  A pathways-based prediction model for classifying breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Tong Wu; Yunfeng Wang; Ronghui Jiang; Xinliang Lu; Jiawei Tian
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-17

8.  HNF4A expression as a potential diagnostic tool to discriminate primary gastric cancer from breast cancer metastasis in a Brazilian cohort.

Authors:  Patrícia Chaves de Freitas Campos Jucá; Stephany Corrêa; Giselle Maria Vignal; Maria Theresa de Souza Accioly; Suzana Angélica Silva Lustosa; Eliana Abdelhay; Delcio Matos
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of central venous catheter-related thromboembolism in breast cancer patients: the CAVECCAS study.

Authors:  Philippe Debourdeau; Marc Espié; Sylvie Chevret; Joseph Gligorov; Antoine Elias; Pierre François Dupré; Kristell Desseaux; Issa Kalidi; Stephane Villiers; Sylvie Giachetti; Corinne Frere; Dominique Farge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer.

Authors:  Muhammad Akram; Mehwish Iqbal; Muhammad Daniyal; Asmat Ullah Khan
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.