Literature DB >> 28108856

Diagnosis and management for trigeminal neuralgia caused solely by venous compression.

Takuro Inoue1, Hisao Hirai2, Ayako Shima2, Fumio Suzuki2, Takanori Fukushima3, Masayuki Matsuda2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) caused solely by venous compression is uncommon. An appropriate vein management protocol for microvascular decompression (MVD) has not been established. We evaluated the management of veins for TN solely due to venous involvement.
METHOD: We analyzed 31 patients with TN in whom only veins were manipulated during MVD. The culprit veins smaller in diameter than the vein of the cerebellopontine fissure (VCPF) were coagulated and divided in 20 patients (divided group), while transposition was performed for larger veins in the remaining 11 patients (non-divided group). Postoperative outcomes were assessed by Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) pain intensity score and BNI facial numbness score.
RESULTS: Preoperative contrast-enhanced T1 spoiled gradient recalled (SPGR) imaging exhibited higher detection rates for veins (93.5%) than non-contrast fast imaging employing a steady-state acquisition image (74.2%). The transverse pontine vein (TPV) was the most frequently involved vessel. All the divided veins were small TPVs except one. The non-divided group included seven cases of large TPVs and four involving the main trunk of the superior petrosal vein or its large tributaries. The median follow-up duration was 33 months. Pain relief was achieved immediately after the surgery in 28 (90.3%) and within a month in the remaining 3 (9.7%) patients. Numbness was present in seven (22.6%) patients at the final follow-up. Recurrence was observed in only two (10.0%) patients in the divided group compared with four (36.4%) patients in the non-divided group. Comparison at the final follow-up revealed that the divided group had superior outcome compared to the non-divided group.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced T1 SPGR imaging is crucial to detect small veins in the preoperative diagnosis. Division of the culprit veins is recommended if the diameter is smaller than the VCPF as it provides a better outcome and lower recurrence rate than transposition.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diagnosis; Management; Microvascular decompression; Trigeminal neuralgia; Vein

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28108856     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-017-3085-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  10 in total

1.  Pain Outcomes Following Microvascular Decompression for Drug-Resistant Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Katherine Holste; Alvin Y Chan; John D Rolston; Dario J Englot
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Prevention of Superior Petrosal Vein Injury during Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia: Operative Nuances.

Authors:  Minsoo Kim; Sang-Ku Park; Seunghoon Lee; Jeong-A Lee; Kwan Park
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-03-01

3.  Factors That May Affect Delayed Relief Of Trigeminal Neuralgia After Microneurosurgery And The Long-Term Outcomes Associated With Delayed Relief.

Authors:  Zhu Deng; Ruiquan Liu; Yin Liu; Zheng Wang; Yanbing Yu; Li Zhang
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Microvascular decompression in patients with hemifacial spasm.

Authors:  Xuegang Niu; Hongtao Sun; Fei Yuan; Xuyi Chen; Zhengjun Wei; Hang Wang; Jibin Ren; Jian Zhang; Weixin Li
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 5.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27

6.  Characteristics of Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia Referred to the Indonesian National Brain Center Neurosurgery Clinic.

Authors:  Mustaqim Prasetya; Peter Adidharma; Adi Sulistyanto; Takuro Inoue; Abrar Arham
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-01-10

7.  Vein-related Trigeminal Neuralgia: How to Determine the Treatment Method of the Causative Vein: A Technical Note.

Authors:  Sho Tsunoda; Tomohiro Inoue; Masafumi Segawa; Atsuya Akabane
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 1.742

8.  Microvascular Decompression for Trigeminal Neuralgia Caused by Venous Offending on the Ventral Side of the Root Entrance/Exit Zone: Classification and Management Strategy.

Authors:  Wenhua Wang; Feng Yu; Sze Chai Kwok; Yuhai Wang; Jia Yin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Long-Term Efficacy and Complications of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation at Different Temperatures for the Treatment of Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Tao Hong; Yuanyuan Ding; Peng Yao
Journal:  Biochem Res Int       Date:  2020-03-04

10.  Purely venous compression in trigeminal neuralgia-can we predict the outcome of surgery.

Authors:  Jörg Baldauf; Ehab El Refaee; Sascha Marx; Marc Matthes; Steffen Fleck; Henry W S Schroeder
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 2.816

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.