Rca Achterbergh1, J J van der Helm1, W van den Boom1, T Heijman1, I G Stolte1, M S van Rooijen1, Hjc de Vries1,2,3. 1. STI outpatient clinic, department of infectious diseases, Public Health Service Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 2. Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 3. Centre for Infection and Immunity Amsterdam (CINIMA), Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections. Many MSM use rectal douches in preparation for sex, which might break down the mucosal barrier function and facilitate the acquisition of STI. We determined whether rectal douching or sharing douching equipment was associated with anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study among 994 MSM attending the STI outpatient clinic of Amsterdam between February and April 2011, data were collected on rectal douching, sexual behaviour and STI. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the association between rectal douching, including sharing of douching equipment, and anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea for those reporting receptive anal sex. We adjusted for other risk behaviour, that is, condom use, number of partners and HIV status. RESULTS: Of 994 MSM, 46% (n=460) practised rectal douching, of whom 25% (n=117) shared douching equipment. Median age was 39 years (IQR 30-47), median number of sex partners in the 6 months prior to consult was five (IQR 3-10) and 289 (29.0%) participants were HIV positive. The prevalence of anorectal chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea for those reporting receptive anal sex was 9.6% (n=96). In multivariable analysis, HIV positivity (aOR=2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6), younger age (aOR=2.5, CI 1.4 to 4.5 for those aged <35 years compared with those aged ≥45 years), and more sexual partners (aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5 for 1 log increase) were significantly associated with anorectal STI. However, rectal douching or sharing douching equipment were not significantly associated with anorectal chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea (p=0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of MSM used rectal douching and a quarter of these shared douching equipment. Though using douching equipment does not appear to contribute to anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea in this study, STI prevalence remains high and prevention strategies like early testing and treatment remain of utmost importance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
INTRODUCTION:Men who have sex with men (MSM) are at high risk for anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea infections. Many MSM use rectal douches in preparation for sex, which might break down the mucosal barrier function and facilitate the acquisition of STI. We determined whether rectal douching or sharing douching equipment was associated with anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study among 994 MSM attending the STI outpatient clinic of Amsterdam between February and April 2011, data were collected on rectal douching, sexual behaviour and STI. We used multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the association between rectal douching, including sharing of douching equipment, and anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea for those reporting receptive anal sex. We adjusted for other risk behaviour, that is, condom use, number of partners and HIV status. RESULTS: Of 994 MSM, 46% (n=460) practised rectal douching, of whom 25% (n=117) shared douching equipment. Median age was 39 years (IQR 30-47), median number of sex partners in the 6 months prior to consult was five (IQR 3-10) and 289 (29.0%) participants were HIV positive. The prevalence of anorectal chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea for those reporting receptive anal sex was 9.6% (n=96). In multivariable analysis, HIV positivity (aOR=2.2, 95% CI 1.3 to 3.6), younger age (aOR=2.5, CI 1.4 to 4.5 for those aged <35 years compared with those aged ≥45 years), and more sexual partners (aOR=1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5 for 1 log increase) were significantly associated with anorectal STI. However, rectal douching or sharing douching equipment were not significantly associated with anorectal chlamydia and/or gonorrhoea (p=0.647). CONCLUSIONS: Almost half of MSM used rectal douching and a quarter of these shared douching equipment. Though using douching equipment does not appear to contribute to anorectal chlamydia and gonorrhoea in this study, STI prevalence remains high and prevention strategies like early testing and treatment remain of utmost importance. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.
Entities:
Keywords:
BACTERIAL INFECTION; GAY MEN; PREVENTION; PUBLIC HEALTH; SEXUAL BEHAVIOUR
Authors: Cheríe S Blair; Marjan Javanbakht; W Scott Comulada; E India Richter; Robert Bolan; Steven Shoptaw; Pamina M Gorbach Journal: Int J STD AIDS Date: 2020-08-04 Impact factor: 1.359
Authors: H Rhodes Hambrick; Su Hyun Park; William C Goedel; Jace G Morganstein; Noah T Kreski; Ofole Mgbako; Dustin T Duncan Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2018-02
Authors: Annemarie Rinder Stengaard; Lauren Combs; Virginie Supervie; Sara Croxford; Sarika Desai; Ann K Sullivan; Stine Finne Jakobsen; Quenia Santos; Daniel Simões; Jordi Casabona; Jeffrey V Lazarus; John B F de Wit; Frank M Amort; Anastasia Pharris; Lina Nerlander; Dorthe Raben Journal: Euro Surveill Date: 2021-11