PURPOSE: Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) have unique risk factors and worse health outcomes than their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. SGMY's significant online activity represents an opportunity for digital interventions. To help meet the sex education and health needs of SGMY and to understand what they consider important, formative research was conducted to guide and inform the development of new digital health interventions. METHODS: Semistructured interviews, in-person focus groups, and online focus groups were conducted with 92 youths (aged 15-19 years) who self-identify as nonheterosexual, noncisgender, questioning, and/or have engaged in same-sex sexual behavior. Data were coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that SGMYs are often driven online by experiences of isolation, stigmatization, and lack of information and are looking for a supportive, validating community and relevant, accurate information. Gender minority youths felt that they faced a larger number of and more extreme incidences of discrimination than sexual minority youths. Most youths described interpersonal discrimination as having substantial negative effects on their mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Any digital intervention for SGMY should focus on mental health and well-being holistically rather than solely on risk behaviors, such as preventing HIV. Interventions should include opportunities for interpersonal connection, foster a sense of belonging, and provide accurate information about sexuality and gender to help facilitate positive identity development. Content and delivery of digital interventions should appeal to diverse sexualities, genders, and other intersecting identities held by SGMY to avoid further alienation.
PURPOSE: Sexual and gender minority youth (SGMY) have unique risk factors and worse health outcomes than their heterosexual and cisgender counterparts. SGMY's significant online activity represents an opportunity for digital interventions. To help meet the sex education and health needs of SGMY and to understand what they consider important, formative research was conducted to guide and inform the development of new digital health interventions. METHODS: Semistructured interviews, in-person focus groups, and online focus groups were conducted with 92 youths (aged 15-19 years) who self-identify as nonheterosexual, noncisgender, questioning, and/or have engaged in same-sex sexual behavior. Data were coded and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Thematic analysis revealed that SGMYs are often driven online by experiences of isolation, stigmatization, and lack of information and are looking for a supportive, validating community and relevant, accurate information. Gender minority youths felt that they faced a larger number of and more extreme incidences of discrimination than sexual minority youths. Most youths described interpersonal discrimination as having substantial negative effects on their mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Any digital intervention for SGMY should focus on mental health and well-being holistically rather than solely on risk behaviors, such as preventing HIV. Interventions should include opportunities for interpersonal connection, foster a sense of belonging, and provide accurate information about sexuality and gender to help facilitate positive identity development. Content and delivery of digital interventions should appeal to diverse sexualities, genders, and other intersecting identities held by SGMY to avoid further alienation.
Authors: César G Escobar-Viera; Sophia Choukas-Bradley; Jaime Sidani; Anne J Maheux; Savannah R Roberts; Bruce L Rollman Journal: Front Digit Health Date: 2022-06-27
Authors: Jonathan Garcia; Nancy Vargas; Jesse L Clark; Mario Magaña Álvarez; Devynne A Nelons; Richard G Parker Journal: Glob Public Health Date: 2019-10-28
Authors: Sean R Cahill; Timothy M Wang; Holly B Fontenot; Sophia R Geffen; Kerith J Conron; Kenneth H Mayer; Michelle M Johns; Sabrina A Avripas; Stuart Michaels; Richard Dunville Journal: J Pediatr Health Care Date: 2021-06-19 Impact factor: 1.838
Authors: Sanjana Pampati; Michelle M Johns; Leigh E Szucs; Meg D Bishop; Allen B Mallory; Lisa C Barrios; Stephen T Russell Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2020-11-05 Impact factor: 7.830
Authors: Warren Scott Comulada; Mary Step; Jesse B Fletcher; Amanda E Tanner; Nadia L Dowshen; Sean Arayasirikul; Kristin Keglovitz Baker; James Zuniga; Dallas Swendeman; Melissa Medich; Uyen H Kao; Adam Northrup; Omar Nieto; Ronald A Brooks Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-11-02 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Cindy J Chang; Brian A Feinstein; Anthony Fulginiti; Christina Dyar; Edward A Selby; Jeremy T Goldbach Journal: Suicide Life Threat Behav Date: 2021-06-22