| Literature DB >> 28107766 |
Masayoshi Yamada1, Yutaka Saito1, Hiroyuki Takamaru1, Hayato Sasaki1, Takuya Yokota1, Yasushi Matsuyama1, Yoshinori Sato1, Taku Sakamoto1, Takeshi Nakajima1, Hirokazu Taniguchi2, Shigeki Sekine3, Takahisa Matsuda1.
Abstract
Background and study aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is known as a curative treatment for colorectal superficial neoplasms. There is however a need for more long-term clinical data to establish the full advantages of colorectal ESD regarding very low recurrence rates. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine long-term clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD. Methods A total of 423 lesions treated by ESD for colorectal adenoma/dysplasia or adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2008 at a single high volume referral center were included. We conducted a retrospective survey on patients with follow-up and obtained complete 1-, 3-, and 5-year outcome data for 358 (85 %), 292 (69 %), and 209 (49 %) lesions, respectively. Curative resection was defined when the pathological specimen had carcinoma-free resection margins, irrespective of piecemeal or en bloc resection, without submucosal deep invasion (≥ 1000 µm), lymphovascular involvement, or a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma component. Results After a median 4.9 years of follow-up, the 3-year overall cumulative endoscopic recurrence rate and cancerous recurrence rate were 2.9 % (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.2 - 4.7) and 1.1 % (0 - 2.1), respectively. The 5-year overall cumulative endoscopic recurrence and cancerous recurrence rates were 3.8 % (1.7 - 5.9) and 1.6 % (0.1 - 3.0), respectively. In 361 lesions eligible for endoscopic follow-up, the 3-year endoscopic recurrence and cancerous recurrence rates were 2.4 % (0.8 - 4.1) and 0.4 % (0 - 1.4), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that piecemeal resection and submucosal deep tumor invasion were associated with recurrence. Conclusions The current study demonstrated favorable long-term clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD when en bloc curative resection is achieved. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28107766 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-124366
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN: 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093