Literature DB >> 28107766

Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasms in 423 cases: a retrospective study.

Masayoshi Yamada1, Yutaka Saito1, Hiroyuki Takamaru1, Hayato Sasaki1, Takuya Yokota1, Yasushi Matsuyama1, Yoshinori Sato1, Taku Sakamoto1, Takeshi Nakajima1, Hirokazu Taniguchi2, Shigeki Sekine3, Takahisa Matsuda1.   

Abstract

Background and study aim Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is known as a curative treatment for colorectal superficial neoplasms. There is however a need for more long-term clinical data to establish the full advantages of colorectal ESD regarding very low recurrence rates. The aim of this retrospective study was to determine long-term clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD. Methods A total of 423 lesions treated by ESD for colorectal adenoma/dysplasia or adenocarcinoma between 1998 and 2008 at a single high volume referral center were included. We conducted a retrospective survey on patients with follow-up and obtained complete 1-, 3-, and 5-year outcome data for 358 (85 %), 292 (69 %), and 209 (49 %) lesions, respectively. Curative resection was defined when the pathological specimen had carcinoma-free resection margins, irrespective of piecemeal or en bloc resection, without submucosal deep invasion (≥ 1000 µm), lymphovascular involvement, or a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma component. Results After a median 4.9 years of follow-up, the 3-year overall cumulative endoscopic recurrence rate and cancerous recurrence rate were 2.9 % (95 % confidence interval [95 %CI] 1.2 - 4.7) and 1.1 % (0 - 2.1), respectively. The 5-year overall cumulative endoscopic recurrence and cancerous recurrence rates were 3.8 % (1.7 - 5.9) and 1.6 % (0.1 - 3.0), respectively. In 361 lesions eligible for endoscopic follow-up, the 3-year endoscopic recurrence and cancerous recurrence rates were 2.4 % (0.8 - 4.1) and 0.4 % (0 - 1.4), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that piecemeal resection and submucosal deep tumor invasion were associated with recurrence. Conclusions The current study demonstrated favorable long-term clinical outcomes of colorectal ESD when en bloc curative resection is achieved. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28107766     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-124366

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  17 in total

1.  Short-term Prospective Questionnaire Study of Early Postoperative Quality of Life After Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection.

Authors:  Fumihiko Nakamura; Yutaka Saito; Shin Haruyama; Masau Sekiguchi; Masayoshi Yamada; Taku Sakamoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Seiichiro Yamamoto; Yoshitaka Murakami; Hideki Ishikawa; Takahisa Matsuda
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the treatment of patients with early colorectal carcinoma and precancerous lesions.

Authors:  Jing Yu; Yan Zhang; Junbo Qian
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-10

3.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection of 301 large colorectal neoplasias: outcome and learning curve from a specialized center in Europe.

Authors:  Carl-Fredrik Rönnow; Noriya Uedo; Ervin Toth; Henrik Thorlacius
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-11-07

4.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection in management of colorectal tumors near or involving a diverticulum: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Victoria Alejandra Jimenez-Garcia; Masayoshi Yamada; Hiroaki Ikematsu; Hiroyuki Takamaru; Seiichiro Abe; Taku Sakamoto; Takeshi Nakajima; Takahisa Matsuda; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-05-03

5.  Acceptability of endoscopic submucosal dissection for sessile serrated lesions: comparison with non-sessile serrated lesions.

Authors:  Yuichiro Kuroki; Toshiyuki Endo; Kenta Iwahashi; Naoki Miyao; Reika Suzuki; Kunio Asonuma; Yorimasa Yamamoto; Masatsugu Nagahama
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2020-11-17

6.  Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum.

Authors:  Tao Chen; Wen-Zheng Qin; Li-Qing Yao; Yun-Shi Zhong; Yi-Qun Zhang; Wei-Feng Chen; Jian-Wei Hu; Marie Ooi; Ling-Li Chen; Ying-Yong Hou; Mei-Dong Xu; Ping-Hong Zhou
Journal:  Cancer Commun (Lond)       Date:  2018-03-21

7.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection of malignant non-pedunculated colorectal lesions.

Authors:  Carl-Fredrik Rönnow; Jacob Elebro; Ervin Toth; Henrik Thorlacius
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2018-08-01

Review 8.  The Relationship between Post-colonoscopy Colorectal Cancer and Quality Indicators of Colonoscopy: The Latest Single-center Cohort Study with a Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hayato Yamaguchi; Masakatsu Fukuzawa; Hirohito Minami; Tadashi Ichimiya; Hiroshi Takahashi; Yubu Matsue; Mitsuyoshi Honjo; Yasutake Hirayama; Daisuke Nutahara; Junichi Taira; Hironori Nakamura; Takashi Kawai; Takao Itoi
Journal:  Intern Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 1.271

9.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal-sigmoid laterally spreading tumors ≥10 cm: an analysis of 10 cases.

Authors:  Jiaxi Lu; Yuyong Tan; Deliang Liu; Chenjie Li; Hejun Zhou
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.241

Review 10.  Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: outcomes and predictors of recurrence.

Authors:  Roberta Maselli; Marco Spadaccini; Paul J Belletrutti; Piera Alessia Galtieri; Simona Attardo; Silvia Carrara; Andrea Anderloni; Alessandro Fugazza; Elisa Chiara Ferrara; Gaia Pellegatta; Andrea Iannone; Cesare Hassan; Alessandro Repici
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.