Literature DB >> 28107765

Lower adenoma miss rate with FUSE vs. conventional colonoscopy with proximal retroflexion: a randomized back-to-back trial.

Ioannis S Papanikolaou1, Periklis Apostolopoulos2, Georgios Tziatzios1, Erasmia Vlachou2, Athanasios D Sioulas1, Dimitrios Polymeros1, Andreas Karameris3, Ioannis Panayiotides4, Georgios Alexandrakis2, George D Dimitriadis1, Konstantinos Triantafyllou1.   

Abstract

Background and study aims Full-spectrum colonoscopy (FSC) promises to increase adenoma detection by providing a wider field of view. The aim of this study was to compare adenoma miss rates of FSC with those of conventional colonoscopy complemented by right-colon re-examination using scope retroflexion (CC/R). Patients and methods At two tertiary endoscopy facilities, patients who were scheduled for colonoscopy for the assessment of symptoms or for colorectal cancer screening/surveillance were randomized (1:1) to undergo same-day, back-to-back colonoscopies (FSC or CC/R first), performed by one of five endoscopists who had documented adenoma detection rates > 35 %. Per-protocol data were analyzed. Results We randomized 220 patients. There were five FSC technical failures (three air pump and two left screen); therefore, 107 and 108 cases were analyzed in the FSC and CC/R index procedure arms, respectively. Withdrawal times were similar for FSC and CC/R (7.7 minutes vs. 7.6 minutes). Overall, we detected 3 cancers and 153 adenomas (FSC = 92; CC/R = 61); 81 were detected in the proximal colon, 3 of which were detected by retroflexed examination. By per-lesion analysis, FSC showed a significantly lower adenoma miss rate compared with CC/R overall (10.9 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 3.8 to 18.1] vs. 33.7 % [95 %CI 23.4 to 44.1]) and in the proximal colon (13.9 % [95 %CI 2.6 to 25.2] vs. 42.2 % [95 %CI 27.8 to 56.7]). The advanced adenoma miss rate was lower with FSC overall (4.3 % [95 %CI - 4.0 to 12.7] vs. 25.9 % [95 %CI 9.4 to 42.5]). There were no adverse events. Conclusions FSC outperformed conventional colonoscopy with right-colon scope retroflexion in the detection of missed adenomas, both overall and in the proximal colon, even when performed by experienced endoscopists.Trial registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02117674). © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28107765     DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-124415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  9 in total

1.  Full spectrum endoscopy for an easy and adequate visualization of Vater's papilla.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Georgios Tziatzios; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-07

2.  An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon with Narrow Band Imaging Decreases Missed Polyps: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Naohisa Yoshida; Ken Inoue; Ritsu Yasuda; Ryohei Hirose; Osamu Dohi; Yuji Naito; Takaaki Murakami; Yutaka Inada; Kiyoshi Ogiso; Yukiko Morinaga; Mitsuo Kishimoto; Rafiz Abdul Rani; Yoshito Itoh
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Optimizing Screening Colonoscopy: Strategies and Alternatives.

Authors:  Hans-Dieter Allescher; Vincens Weingart
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2019-07-09

Review 4.  The Role of Behind Folds Visualizing Techniques and Technologies in Improving Adenoma Detection Rate.

Authors:  K E van Keulen; E Soons; P D Siersema
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-09

Review 5.  Second exam of right colon improves adenoma detection rate: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Faisal Kamal; Muhammad Ali Khan; Wade Lee-Smith; Sachit Sharma; Ashu Acharya; Zaid Imam; Umer Farooq; John Hanson; Vian Pulous; Muhammad Aziz; Saurabh Chandan; Abdul Kouanda; Sun-Chuan Dai; Craig A Munroe; Colin W Howden
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2022-10-17

6.  Proximal retroflexion versus second forward view of the right colon during screening colonoscopy: A multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ma Henar Núñez Rodríguez; Pilar Díez Redondo; Fausto Riu Pons; Marta Cimavilla; Luis Hernández; Andrea Loza; Manuel Pérez-Miranda
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.623

7.  New endoscopy advances to refine adenoma detection rate for colorectal cancer screening: None is the winner.

Authors:  Marcello Maida; Salvatore Camilleri; Michele Manganaro; Serena Garufi; Giuseppe Scarpulla
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-10-15

Review 8.  New endoscopes and add-on devices to improve colonoscopy performance.

Authors:  Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Georgios Tziatzios; George D Dimitriadis; Konstantinos Triantafyllou
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Can technology increase adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Wee Sing Ngu; Colin Rees
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 4.409

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.