| Literature DB >> 28107529 |
Kenji M Cunnion1,2,3, Neel K Krishna1,2, Haree K Pallera1, Angela Pineros-Fernandez4, Magdielis Gregory Rivera1, Pamela S Hair1, Brittany P Lassiter2, Ryan Huyck5, Mary A Clements6,7, Antoinette F Hood6,7, George T Rodeheaver4, Patrick S Cottler4, Jerry L Nadler8, Anca D Dobrian5.
Abstract
Diabetic non-healing wounds are a major clinical problem. The mechanisms leading to poor wound healing in diabetes are multifactorial but unresolved inflammation may be a major contributing factor. The complement system (CS) is the most potent inflammatory cascade in humans and contributes to poor wound healing in animal models. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 4 (STAT4) is a transcription factor expressed in immune and adipose cells and contributes to upregulation of some inflammatory chemokines and cytokines. Persistent CS and STAT4 expression in diabetic wounds may thus contribute to chronic inflammation and delayed healing. The purpose of this study was to characterize CS and STAT4 in early diabetic wounds using db/db mice as a diabetic skin wound model. The CS was found to be activated early in the diabetic wounds as demonstrated by increased anaphylatoxin C5a in wound fluid and C3-fragment deposition by immunostaining. These changes were associated with a 76% increase in nucleated cells in the wounds of db/db mice vs. CONTROLS: The novel classical CS inhibitor, Peptide Inhibitor of Complement C1 (PIC1) reduced inflammation when added directly or saturated in an acellular skin scaffold, as reflected by reduced CS components and leukocyte infiltration. A significant increase in expression of STAT4 and the downstream macrophage chemokine CCL2 and its receptor CCR2 were also found in the early wounds of db/db mice compared to non-diabetic controls. These studies provide evidence for two new promising targets to reduce unresolved inflammation and to improve healing of diabetic skin wounds.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28107529 PMCID: PMC5249255 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170500
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Complement activation and cellular inflammation for acute skin wounds in diabetic mice.
(A) C5a concentration in wound beds of diabetic and control mice absorbed by filter paper and assayed by ELISA. Left and right wounds averaged for n = 3 mice in each group and time point: 10 min (P = 0.05) 2h (P = 0.002), 4h (P = 0.001), 24h (P = 0.05). * P ≤0.05 vs. hetero (control). (B) C3-fragment deposition (C3 opsonization) in the subcutaneous tissue at the edges of the wound beds of diabetic and control mice assayed by immunofluorescence (n = 2). (C) Nucleated cell infiltration into the subcutaneous tissue at the edges of the wound beds of diabetic and control mice assayed by DAPI fluorescence (n = 2). Data are means ± SEM.
Fig 2Longitudinal changes in gene expression of STAT4, Ccl2 and Ccr2 in diabetic db/db mice and controls.
Wounds were excised at indicated time points and gene expression was measured by real-time PCR using Taqman probes. Results are expressed as 1/ΔCt and represent the average of two wounds/mouse from 3 mice/group +/-SEM. * P ≤0.05 vs. dbhet (control); # P ≤0.05 vs. t = 0 (approximately 10 minutes after wounding).
Fig 3Immunohistochemistry showing longitudinal changes in expression of STAT4 in diabetic db/db and heterozygous control mice.
(A) Representative micrographs showing STAT4 immunostaining (red) and nuclear staining using DAPI (blue) of formalin fixed paraffin embedded whole wounds of db/db-/- and control mice at the time of wounding (T0) and after 8 and 48 hours, respectively. Magnification: 100x; (B) High power (400x) images of the dermis (top) and adipose tissue (bottom) layers of the dbdb-/- and control mice at 48 hours post-wounding. Solid arrows indicate peri-nuclear localization of STAT4 and dashed arrows indicate nuclear localization. Insets represent higher magnification of the nuclear (top) or peri-nuclear (bottom) localization of the signal. (C) Grading of STAT4 staining in the dermis and dermal adipose tissue of diabetic db/db and control mice. A scale of “0” to”3” was used to quantify the abundance of staining. A number of 5–8 micrographs/section from n = 3 mice/group were graded by 4 independent observers in a blinded manner. * P ≤0.05.
Fig 4Complement effectors in acute skin wounds of diabetic and control mice covered with a gel ± complement inhibitor, PIC1.
(A) C5a concentration in the wound beds of diabetic and heterozygous control mice absorbed by filter paper and assayed by ELISA. Left and right wounds averaged for n = 3 mice in each group and time point: 4H (P = 0.002), 8H (P = 0.007) and 48H (P = 0.05). (B) C5a concentration in the wound beds of diabetic and heterozygous control mice treated with vehicle control gel or PIC1 gel (combined time points). db/db ± PIC1 (P = 0.05). Heterozygous ± PIC1 (P = 0.01); data are means ± SEM. (C) C3-fragment deposition (C3 opsonization) in the subcutaneous tissue at the edges of the wound beds of diabetic and control mice treated with vehicle control gel or PIC1 gel (combined time points). db/db ± PIC1 (P = 0.09). Heterozygous ± PIC1 (P = 0.12), Data are means ± SEM. * P ≤0.05 vs. saline control.
Fig 5Analysis of leukocyte inflammation of wounds for diabetic mice treated with PIC1 at 14 days.
Representative wound histology (H&E) for (A) control scaffold only mice, and (B) PIC1 impregnated skin scaffold. (C) Averaged inflammatory index of leukocytes (predominantly neutrophils) for db/db mice at day 14 post wounding for wounds treated with PIC1 complement inhibitor in a skin scaffold or control skin scaffold, n = 6 in each group. Data are means ± SEM. * P ≤0.05 vs. saline control.