Literature DB >> 28107171

The relationship between vacuum and hemolysis during catheter blood collection: a retrospective analysis of six large cohorts.

Cornelia Mrazek1, Ana-Maria Simundic1, Helmut Wiedemann1, Florian Krahmer1, Thomas Klaus Felder1, Ulrike Kipman1, Uta Hoppe1, Elisabeth Haschke-Becher1, Janne Cadamuro1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Blood collection through intravenous (IV) catheters is a common practice at emergency departments (EDs). This technique is associated with higher in vitro hemolysis rates and may even be amplified by the use of vacuum collection tubes. Our aim was to investigate the association of five different vacuum tubes with hemolysis rates in comparison to an aspiration system under real-life conditions and to propose an equation to estimate the amount of hemolysis, depending on the vacuum collection tube type.
METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated hemolysis data of plasma samples from our ED, where blood is drawn through IV catheters. Over the past 5 years, we compared 19,001 hemolysis index values amongst each other and against the respective vacuum pressure (Pv) of the collection tubes, which were used within the six observational periods.
RESULTS: The highest hemolysis rates were associated with full-draw evacuated tubes. Significantly reduced hemolysis was observed for two kinds of partial-draw tubes. The hemolysis rate of one partial-draw blood collection tube was comparable to those of the aspiration system. Regression analysis of Pv and mean free hemoglobin (fHb) values yielded the formula fHb (g/L)=0.0082*Pv2-0.1143*Pv+ 0.5314 with an R2 of 0.99.
CONCLUSIONS: If IV catheters are used for blood collection, hemolysis rates directly correlate with the vacuum within the tubes and can be estimated by the proposed formula. By the use of partial-draw vacuum blood collection tubes, hemolysis rates in IV catheter collections can be reduced to levels comparable with collections performed by aspiration systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  blood collection; emergency department; hemolysis; preanalytics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28107171     DOI: 10.1515/cclm-2016-0940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med        ISSN: 1434-6621            Impact factor:   3.694


  4 in total

1.  Determination of hemolysis index thresholds for biochemical tests on Siemens Advia 2400 chemistry analyzer.

Authors:  Zhenhua Du; JiQin Liu; Hua Zhang; BuHe Bao; RuiQi Zhao; Ying Jin
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  European survey on preanalytical sample handling - Part 2: Practices of European laboratories on monitoring and processing haemolytic, icteric and lipemic samples. On behalf of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) Working Group for the Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE).

Authors:  Janne Cadamuro; Giuseppe Lippi; Alexander von Meyer; Mercedes Ibarz; Edmee van Dongen; Michael Cornes; Mads Nybo; Pieter Vermeersch; Kjell Grankvist; Joao Tiago Guimaraes; Gunn B B Kristensen; Barbara de la Salle; Ana-Maria Simundic
Journal:  Biochem Med (Zagreb)       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 2.313

3.  Rejection of hemolyzed samples can jeopardize patient safety.

Authors:  Lorenzo Barbato; Marise Danielle Campelo; Sara Pigozzo; Nicola Realdon; Anna Gandini; Roberto Barbazza; Mayara Ladeira Coêlho; Chiara Bovo; Paola Marini; Gabriel Lima-Oliveira
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2020-03-20

4.  Evaluation of the Barricor Tube in 28 Routine Chemical Tests and Its Impact on Turnaround Time in an Outpatient Clinic.

Authors:  Soo Young Moon; Han Sol Lee; Min Soon Park; In-Suk Kim; Sun Min Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.464

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.