Literature DB >> 28107055

Radiating despite a Lack of Character: Ecological Divergence among Closely Related, Morphologically Similar Honeyeaters (Aves: Meliphagidae) Co-occurring in Arid Australian Environments.

Eliot T Miller, Sarah K Wagner, Luke J Harmon, Robert E Ricklefs.   

Abstract

Quantifying the relationship between form and function can inform use of morphology as a surrogate for ecology. How the strength of this relationship varies continentally can inform understanding of evolutionary radiations; for example, does the relationship break down when certain lineages invade and diversify in novel habitats? The 75 species of Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae) are morphologically and ecologically diverse, with species feeding on nectar, insects, fruit, and other resources. We investigated Meliphagidae ecomorphology and community structure by (1) quantifying the concordance between morphology and ecology (foraging behavior), (2) estimating rates of trait evolution in relation to the packing of ecological space, and (3) comparing phylogenetic and trait community structure across the broad environmental gradients of the continent. We found that morphology explained 37% of the variance in ecology (and 62% vice versa), and we uncovered well-known bivariate relationships among the multivariate ecomorphological data. Ecological trait diversity declined less rapidly than phylogenetic diversity along a gradient of decreasing precipitation. We employ a new method (trait fields) and extend another (phylogenetic fields) to show that while species in phylogenetically clustered, arid-environment assemblages are similar morphologically, they are as varied in foraging behavior as those from more diverse assemblages. Thus, although closely related and similar morphologically, these arid-adapted species have diverged in ecological space to a similar degree as their mesic counterparts.

Entities:  

Keywords:  community assembly; ecomorphology; functional traits; interspecific competition; phylogenetic community structure; phylogenetic niche conservatism

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28107055     DOI: 10.1086/690008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  7 in total

Review 1.  Phylogenetic tests for evolutionary innovation: the problematic link between key innovations and exceptional diversification.

Authors:  Daniel L Rabosky
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Macroevolutionary convergence connects morphological form to ecological function in birds.

Authors:  Alex L Pigot; Catherine Sheard; Eliot T Miller; Tom P Bregman; Benjamin G Freeman; Uri Roll; Nathalie Seddon; Christopher H Trisos; Brian C Weeks; Joseph A Tobias
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Ecological and geographical overlap drive plumage evolution and mimicry in woodpeckers.

Authors:  Eliot T Miller; Gavin M Leighton; Benjamin G Freeman; Alexander C Lees; Russell A Ligon
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Evolution of a multifunctional trait: shared effects of foraging ecology and thermoregulation on beak morphology, with consequences for song evolution.

Authors:  Nicholas R Friedman; Eliot T Miller; Jason R Ball; Haruka Kasuga; Vladimír Remeš; Evan P Economo
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Trophic niche shifts and phenotypic trait evolution are largely decoupled in Australasian parrots.

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Joseph A Tobias; Manuel Schweizer; Daniel Wegmann; Richard Schodde; Janette A Norman; Les Christidis
Journal:  BMC Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-27

6.  Environmental determinism, and not interspecific competition, drives morphological variability in Australasian warblers (Acanthizidae).

Authors:  Vicente García-Navas; Marta Rodríguez-Rey; Petter Z Marki; Les Christidis
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Disentangling direct and indirect effects of water availability, vegetation, and topography on avian diversity.

Authors:  Vladimír Remeš; Lenka Harmáčková
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.