Literature DB >> 28107049

Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: Using Confidence Intervals and Effect Sizes to Evaluate Clinical Meaningfulness.

Monica Lininger1, Bryan L Riemann2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe confidence intervals (CIs) and effect sizes and provide practical examples to assist clinicians in assessing clinical meaningfulness.
BACKGROUND: As discussed in our first article in 2015, which addressed the difference between statistical significance and clinical meaningfulness, evaluating the clinical meaningfulness of a research study remains a challenge to many readers. In this paper, we will build on this topic by examining CIs and effect sizes. DESCRIPTION: A CI is a range estimated from sample data (the data we collect) that is likely to include the population parameter (value) of interest. Conceptually, this constitutes the lower and upper limits of the sample data, which would likely include, for example, the mean from the unknown population. An effect size is the magnitude of difference between 2 means. When a statistically significant difference exists between 2 means, effect size is used to describe how large or small that difference actually is. Confidence intervals and effect sizes enhance the practical interpretation of research results. RECOMMENDATIONS: Along with statistical significance, the CI and effect size can assist practitioners in better understanding the clinical meaningfulness of a research study.

Keywords:  data interpretation; reporting statistical findings; statistics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28107049      PMCID: PMC5264560          DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.14

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Athl Train        ISSN: 1062-6050            Impact factor:   2.860


  4 in total

1.  Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: The Difference Between Statistical and Clinical Meaningfulness.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Monica Lininger
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size.

Authors:  Matthew R Rhea
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Measurement of ankle dorsiflexion: a comparison of active and passive techniques in multiple positions.

Authors:  David A Krause; Beth A Cloud; Lindsey A Forster; Jennifer A Schrank; John H Hollman
Journal:  J Sport Rehabil       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.931

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: Understanding the Role of Statistical Power in Comparative Athletic Training Research.

Authors:  Monica R Lininger; Bryan L Riemann
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.860

2.  Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization: A Systematic Review and Effect-Size Analysis.

Authors:  Cristina B Seffrin; Nicole M Cattano; Melissa A Reed; Alison M Gardiner-Shires
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 2.860

3.  Investigation of variation factors in EMG measurement of swallowing: instruction can improve EMG reproducibility.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Ohmori; Seiichi Watanabe; Hideya Momose; Hiroshi Endo; Manabu Chikai; Shuichi Ino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 3.079

Review 4.  Statistical Primer for Athletic Trainers: The Essentials of Understanding Measures of Reliability and Minimal Important Change.

Authors:  Bryan L Riemann; Monica R Lininger
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-01-13       Impact factor: 2.860

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.