| Literature DB >> 28106806 |
Xiaohua Wang1, Xi Li2, Mingzhe Rong3, Dingli Xie4, Dan Ding5, Zhixiang Wang6,7.
Abstract
The ultra-high frequency (UHF) method is widely used in insulation condition assessment. However, UHF signal processing algorithms are complicated and the size of the result is large, which hinders extracting features and recognizing partial discharge (PD) patterns. This article investigated the chromatic methodology that is novel in PD detection. The principle of chromatic methodologies in color science are introduced. The chromatic processing represents UHF signals sparsely. The UHF signals obtained from PD experiments were processed using chromatic methodology and characterized by three parameters in chromatic space (H, L, and S representing dominant wavelength, signal strength, and saturation, respectively). The features of the UHF signals were studied hierarchically. The results showed that the chromatic parameters were consistent with conventional frequency domain parameters. The global chromatic parameters can be used to distinguish UHF signals acquired by different sensors, and they reveal the propagation properties of the UHF signal in the L-shaped gas-insulated switchgear (GIS). Finally, typical PD defect patterns had been recognized by using novel chromatic parameters in an actual GIS tank and good performance of recognition was achieved.Entities:
Keywords: chromatic; gas-insulated switchgear (GIS); partial discharge (PD); pattern recognition; propagation characteristics; ultra-high frequency (UHF)
Year: 2017 PMID: 28106806 PMCID: PMC5298750 DOI: 10.3390/s17010177
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Experimental Setup: (a) GIS tank and placements of UHF sensors; (b) geometrical dimensions of GIS tank; and (c) schematic diagram of experimental circuit.
Figure 2UHF signals acquired by four sensors: (a) time domain; and (b) frequency domain.
Figure 3Two kinds of chromatic processor profiles: (a) Gaussian functions; and (b) triangular functions. R: red, G: green, B: blue.
Figure 4Comparison of waveforms between parameters H and the average frequency of the UHF-B frequency spectrum.
Figure 5Comparison of waveforms between parameters L and the energy of the UHF-B frequency spectrum.
Figure 6Comparison of waveforms between parameters S and the (RMS bandwidth)2 of the UHF-B frequency spectrum.
Floating point operations of different parameters.
| Parameters 1 | R | G | B | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flops 2 | ||||||
| Flops in Total | ||||||
1 Defined in Equations (1)–(4); 2 M is the length of the discrete spectrum.
Figure 7Distribution of 10 groups of UHF signals obtained by the four sensors in the H-S polar diagram: (a) global diagram; and (b) enlarged diagram. (UHF: ultra-high frequency).
d values of the intervals across the L-branch.
| Intervals | Standard Deviation (σ) | |
|---|---|---|
| UHF-A to UHF-C | 0.2154 | 0.0064 |
| UHF-A to UHF-D | 0.2011 | 0.0182 |
| UHF-B to UHF-C | 0.1988 | 0.0296 |
| UHF-B to UHF-D | 0.2014 | 0.0204 |
d values of the intervals across the L-branch.
| Intervals | Distance (mm) | Resolution (mm−1) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| UHF-A to UHF-B | 4.79 | 630 | 0.00760 |
| UHF-C to UHF-D | 4.87 | 820 | 0.00594 |
Figure 8Typical PD defect patterns in actual 252 kV GIS tank: (a) floating electrode; (b) metal protrusion; and (c) particles on the spacer surface.
Figure 9Chromatic parameters distribution of different PD patterns in polar diagram: (a) H-S; and (b) H-L.
Classification results of the SVM model in the chromatic space.
| PD Defect Pattern | Number of Recognition | Recognition Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Floating electrode | 50 | 100% |
| Metal protrusion | 44 | 88% |
| Particle on the spacer surface | 36 | 72% |
Figure 10Flow chart of PD pattern recognition using chromatic methodology (GIS: gas-insulated switchgear; PD: partial discharge; UHF: ultra-high frequency; WIFI: wireless fidelity; SVM: support vector machine; PC: personal computer).