Literature DB >> 28106528

Experimental transmission of Zika virus by mosquitoes from central Europe.

Anna Heitmann1,2, Stephanie Jansen1,2,3, Renke Lühken1, Mayke Leggewie1,3, Marlis Badusche1, Björn Pluskota4, Norbert Becker4,5, Olli Vapalahti6, Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit1,3, Egbert Tannich1,3.   

Abstract

Mosquitoes collected in Germany in 2016, including Culex pipiens pipiens biotype pipiens, Culex torrentium and Aedes albopictus, as well as Culex pipiens pipiens biotype molestus (in colony since 2011) were experimentally infected with Zika virus (ZIKV) at 18 °C or 27 °C. None of the Culex taxa showed vector competence for ZIKV. In contrast, Aedes albopictus were susceptible for ZIKV but only at 27 °C, with transmission rates similar to an Aedes aegypti laboratory colony tested in parallel. This article is copyright of The Authors, 2017.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aedes albopictus; Culex species; Zika virus; transmission rate

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28106528      PMCID: PMC5404485          DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.2.30437

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


In 2015, Zika virus (ZIKV) emerged in Columbia and Brazil and spread rapidly across the American continent and the Caribbean, causing an epidemic with notable numbers of associated clinical cases of microcephaly and Guillain–Barré syndrome [1]. Mosquitoes of the species Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus are considered the primary and secondary vectors of ZIKV [2]. However, with transmission rates below 50%, their vector competence for ZIKV in the laboratory is low [3]. The question therefore remains whether other common mosquito species such as Culex spp. play a role in the transmission cycle of ZIKV. The few studies performed so far have provided inconclusive results and suggested that at least Culex quinquefasciatus might be able to transmit ZIKV [4-9]. In addition, for an assessment of the risk of possible spread to regions with temperate climate such as central Europe, information is lacking on ZIKV vector competence of mosquitoes under reduced temperature conditions (< 20°C). This study aimed to evaluate the vector competence of central European mosquito species for ZIKV. Therefore, German populations of Culex pipiens pipiens biotype pipiens (Cx. p. pipiens), Culex pipiens pipiens biotype molestus (Cx. p. molestus), Culex torrentium and Ae. albopictus (Ae. albopictus, GER) were experimentally infected with ZIKV, using Ae. aegypti and an Italian Ae. albopictus (Ae. albopictus, ITA) as positive controls.

Experimental infection of mosquitoes

Two long-established laboratory strains (Ae. aegypti (Bayer company) and Cx. p. molestus (in colony since 2011, collected in Heidelberg, Germany)) and four species collected in summer 2016 (Cx. p. pipiens F0 (collected in Hamburg, Germany), Culex torrentium F0 (collected in Hamburg, Germany), Ae. albopictus F7 (collected in Freiburg, Germany) and Ae. albopictus F7 (collected in Calabria, Italy)) were analysed and maintained as previously described [10,11]. All colonies tested negative in pan-flavivirus PCRs [12]. Between 150 and 200 female mosquitoes 4–14 days-old were starved for 24 h before application of infectious blood meals containing ZIKV (strain ZIKV_FB-GWUH-2016, GenBank KU870645, fifth passage) [13] at a final concentration of 107 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL. Artificial feeding was performed using a Hemotek Feeder (Aedes spp.) or by cotton sticks (Culex spp.). Engorged females were incubated at 80% humidity at either 18 °C or 27 °C. Analyses for ZIKV were done 14 and 21 days post infection (dpi) for approximately 35 randomly selected females and twice the number for Ae. aegypti at 27°C. For salivation, mosquitoes were anaesthetised and the proboscises were inserted into cropped 10 µL filter tips containing 10 µL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). After 30 min, tips were removed and saliva-containing PBS was analysed for the presence of infectious virus particles by measuring its cytopathic effect (CPE) on Vero cells within the following 8 days. ZIKV in the supernatant of cytopathic cells was confirmed by qRT-PCR using Real Star Zika Virus RT-PCR Kit (Altona diagnostics, Hamburg, Germany). In addition, bodies of all challenged mosquitoes, excluding legs and wings, were analysed for ZIKV RNA by qRT-PCR.

Results

At 14 or 21 dpi, ZIKV RNA was detected in the bodies of all challenged mosquito taxa, with infection rates ranging between 3 and 72% in the species–temperature combinations with ZIKV-positive bodies. Infection rates and virus titres were substantially higher in Aedes species, with viral RNA copies ranging from 102 to 104 in Culex spp. and from 104 to 109 in Aedes spp. (Table).
Table

Susceptibility and transmission rates of mosquitoes experimentally infected with Zika virus (n = 856)

14 days post infection21 days post infection
Mosquito taxaT in °CIRa(%)Mean (SD) log10 RNA copies/specimenbTRc(%)IRa(%)Mean (SD) log10 RNA copies/specimenTR(%)
Aedes aegypti 1817/31(55)4.70(0.86)0/1718/33(55)4.33(0.63)0/18
2731/63(49)8.69(1.60)14/31(45)36/50(72)6.82(1.75)11/36(31)
Aedes albopictus, ITA1819/30(63)4.05(0.59)0/1914/39(36)5.52(0.87)0/14
2722/31(71)6.34(2.14)4/22(18)15/29(52)7.41(2.22)2/15(13)
Aedes albopictus, GER184/32(13)6.22(1.25)0/411/32(34)6.36(1.39)0/11
2720/31(65)6.78(2.41)4/20(20)18/34(53)8.61(1.82)6/18(33)
Culex p. molestus 1812/41(29)3.40(0.38)0/122/32(6)2.48(0.29)0/2
277/29(24)3.73(0.38)0/712/38(32)4.02(0.44)0/12
Culex p. pipiens 1816/34(47)3.38(0.40)0/163/32(9)3.88(0.43)0/3
273/37(8)3.13(0.45)0/30/35(0)NAdNAd
Culex torrentium 1811/35(31)3.15(0.47)0/111/38(3)3.31(NA)0/1
274/36(11)3.80(1.79)0/40/34(0)NAdNAd

GER: from Germany; IR: infection rate; ITA: from Italy; NA: not available; SD: standard deviation; T: temperature; TR: transmission rate.

a Infection rate: number of ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies per number of fed females.

b RNA copies were averaged over all ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies excluding the zeros of ZIKV-negative mosquito bodies.

c Transmission rate: number of mosquitoes with ZIKV-positive saliva per number of ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies.

d Not available: Mean viral RNA copies and transmission rate could not be calculated for the species–temperature combinations with no ZIKV-positive bodies.

GER: from Germany; IR: infection rate; ITA: from Italy; NA: not available; SD: standard deviation; T: temperature; TR: transmission rate. a Infection rate: number of ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies per number of fed females. b RNA copies were averaged over all ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies excluding the zeros of ZIKV-negative mosquito bodies. c Transmission rate: number of mosquitoes with ZIKV-positive saliva per number of ZIKV-positive mosquito bodies. d Not available: Mean viral RNA copies and transmission rate could not be calculated for the species–temperature combinations with no ZIKV-positive bodies. Virus load was generally higher at elevated incubation temperature (27 °C vs 18 °C). However, transmission of infectious virus particles as measured by CPE of Vero cells incubated with mosquito saliva was not detected in any of the Culex taxa. In contrast, saliva was positive for infectious virus particles in all Aedes species, but only at 27 °C incubation temperature. Interestingly, transmission rates at 21 dpi were similar in Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus from Germany but were substantially lower in Ae. albopictus from southern Italy (30% vs 13%).

Discussion

Culex species from central Europe are known as established vectors, able to transmit numerous viruses including West Nile, Sindbis and Usutu virus [14,15]. The results presented here indicate that the three most common Culex taxa in central Europe (Cx. p. pipiens, Cx. p. molestus and Cx. torrentium) do not have vector competence for ZIKV. This is in agreement with results from other parts of the world including Italy [4-7,9], which all showed a low degree of compentence of the Cx. pipiens complex for ZIKV transmission. The invasive mosquito Ae. albopictus is established in large parts around the Mediterranean Sea and is considered to be the main vector in Europe for autochthonous human infections with chikungunya and dengue virus [16]. Aedes albopictus are regularly introduced into Germany as accidental cargo via road traffic from southern Europe [17]. In the winter 2015/16, successful overwintering of the species was observed for the first time in southern Germany [18]. The results presented here indicate that specimens of this overwintering population have considerable susceptibility to ZIKV, although only at elevated temperature of 27 °C. Moreover, the transmission rate in this overwintering population was substantially higher than in Ae. albopictus from the Calabrian region in southern Italy. Whether the difference in virus susceptibility between German and Italian Ae. albopictus populations is due to an ongoing process of adaptation to a new environment or to experimental conditions remains to be determined. Nevertheless, the susceptibility of European Ae. albopictus to ZIKV demonstrates the risk of arbovirus transmission associated with the establishment and ongoing spread of this invasive mosquito species in Europe. Of note, none of the tested Aedes populations were susceptible to ZIKV at 18 °C, which may limit the spread of ZIKV in central Europe to short summer periods with high temperatures. However, for a comprehensive risk assessment of ZIKV transmission in central Europe, further infection studies are needed at intermediate temperatures (e.g. 21 °C and 24 °C) as well as with other common Aedes species such as Ae. vexans or the newly established Ae. japonicus [19].
  17 in total

1.  Medical importance of Sindbis virus in south-west Germany.

Authors:  Hanna Jöst; Simone Bürck-Kammerer; Gero Hütter; Erik Lattwein; Sabine Lederer; Nadine Litzba; Oswinde Bock-Hensley; Petra Emmerich; Stephan Günther; Norbert Becker; Matthias Niedrig; Jonas Schmidt-Chanasit
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 3.168

2.  Winter Activity and Aboveground Hybridization Between the Two Biotypes of the West Nile Virus Vector Culex pipiens.

Authors:  Chantal B F Vogels; Lennart J J van de Peppel; Arnold J H van Vliet; Marcel Westenberg; Adolfo Ibañez-Justicia; Arjan Stroo; Jan A Buijs; Tessa M Visser; Constantianus J M Koenraadt
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 2.133

3.  Culex Species Mosquitoes and Zika Virus.

Authors:  Yan-Jang S Huang; Victoria B Ayers; Amy C Lyons; Isik Unlu; Barry W Alto; Lee W Cohnstaedt; Stephen Higgs; Dana L Vanlandingham
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.133

4.  Development of multiplex real-time reverse transcriptase PCR assays for detecting eight medically important flaviviruses in mosquitoes.

Authors:  Day-Yu Chao; Brent S Davis; Gwong-Jen J Chang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Distribution and genetic structure of Aedes japonicus japonicus populations (Diptera: Culicidae) in Germany.

Authors:  Katrin Huber; Kathrin Schuldt; Martin Rudolf; Marco Marklewitz; Dina M Fonseca; Christian Kaufmann; Yoshio Tsuda; Sandra Junglen; Andreas Krüger; Norbert Becker; Egbert Tannich; Stefanie C Becker
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.289

6.  Zika Virus Infection with Prolonged Maternal Viremia and Fetal Brain Abnormalities.

Authors:  Rita W Driggers; Cheng-Ying Ho; Essi M Korhonen; Suvi Kuivanen; Anne J Jääskeläinen; Teemu Smura; Avi Rosenberg; D Ashley Hill; Roberta L DeBiasi; Gilbert Vezina; Julia Timofeev; Fausto J Rodriguez; Lev Levanov; Jennifer Razak; Preetha Iyengar; Andrew Hennenfent; Richard Kennedy; Robert Lanciotti; Adre du Plessis; Olli Vapalahti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 7.  Zika Virus.

Authors:  Didier Musso; Duane J Gubler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

8.  Culex mosquitoes are experimentally unable to transmit Zika virus.

Authors:  Fadila Amraoui; Célestine Atyame-Nten; Anubis Vega-Rúa; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Marie Vazeille; Anna Bella Failloux
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-09-01

9.  Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus: a potential vector to transmit Zika virus.

Authors:  Xiao-Xia Guo; Chun-Xiao Li; Yong-Qiang Deng; Dan Xing; Qin-Mei Liu; Qun Wu; Ai-Juan Sun; Yan-de Dong; Wu-Chun Cao; Cheng-Feng Qin; Tong-Yan Zhao
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 7.163

10.  Differential Susceptibilities of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus from the Americas to Zika Virus.

Authors:  Thais Chouin-Carneiro; Anubis Vega-Rua; Marie Vazeille; André Yebakima; Romain Girod; Daniella Goindin; Myrielle Dupont-Rouzeyrol; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; Anna-Bella Failloux
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2016-03-03
View more
  46 in total

Review 1.  Mosquito-borne and sexual transmission of Zika virus: Recent developments and future directions.

Authors:  Tereza Magalhaes; Brian D Foy; Ernesto T A Marques; Gregory D Ebel; James Weger-Lucarelli
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 3.303

2.  Emerging mosquito species in Germany-a synopsis after 6 years of mosquito monitoring (2011-2016).

Authors:  Helge Kampen; Astrid Schuhbauer; Doreen Walther
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-10-14       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Potential of a Northern Population of Aedes vexans (Diptera: Culicidae) to Transmit Zika Virus.

Authors:  Kyle L O'Donnell; Mckenzie A Bixby; Kelsey J Morin; David S Bradley; Jefferson A Vaughan
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 2.278

Review 4.  Zika Virus Mosquito Vectors: Competence, Biology, and Vector Control.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Kauffman; Laura D Kramer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 5.  Modes of Transmission of Zika Virus.

Authors:  Christopher J Gregory; Titilope Oduyebo; Aaron C Brault; John T Brooks; Koo-Whang Chung; Susan Hills; Matthew J Kuehnert; Paul Mead; Dana Meaney-Delman; Ingrid Rabe; Erin Staples; Lyle R Petersen
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes do not support replication of Zika virus.

Authors:  Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira; João T Marques; Vattipally B Sreenu; Célestine Atyame Nten; Eric Roberto Guimarães Rocha Aguiar; Margus Varjak; Alain Kohl; Anna-Bella Failloux
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2017-10-27       Impact factor: 3.891

Review 7.  Aedes aegypti vector competence studies: A review.

Authors:  Jayme A Souza-Neto; Jeffrey R Powell; Mariangela Bonizzoni
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.342

Review 8.  Mosquito-borne arboviruses of African origin: review of key viruses and vectors.

Authors:  Leo Braack; A Paulo Gouveia de Almeida; Anthony J Cornel; Robert Swanepoel; Christiaan de Jager
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.876

9.  Surveillance of Zika virus infection in the EU/EEA, June 2015 to January 2017.

Authors:  G Spiteri; B Sudre; A Septfons; J Beauté
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2017-10

Review 10.  Zika virus: An updated review of competent or naturally infected mosquitoes.

Authors:  Yanouk Epelboin; Stanislas Talaga; Loïc Epelboin; Isabelle Dusfour
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2017-11-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.