| Literature DB >> 28106277 |
Kei Kawaguchi1,2,3, Kentaro Igarashi1,2, Takashi Murakami1,2, Ming Zhao1, Yong Zhang1, Bartosz Chmielowski4, Tasuku Kiyuna1,2, Scott D Nelson5, Tara A Russell6, Sarah M Dry5, Yunfeng Li5, Michiaki Unno3, Fritz C Eilber6,7, Robert M Hoffman1,2,7.
Abstract
Previously, a BRAF-V600E-mutant melanoma obtained from the right chest wall of a patient was grown orthotopically in the right chest wall of nude mice to establish a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) model. Trametinib (TRA), an MEK inhibitor, caused tumor regression. In contrast, another MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib (COB) could slow but not arrest growth or cause regression of the melanoma PDOX. First-line therapy temozolomide (TEM) could slow but not arrest tumor growth or cause regression. In addition, vemurafenib (VEM) was not effective even though VEM is supposed to target the BRAF-V600E mutation. We also previously demonstrated that tumor-targeting with S. typhimurium A1-R combined with TEM was significantly more effective than either S. typhimurium A1-R alone or TEM alone on the melanoma PDOX with the BRAF-V600E mutation. The present study used this PDOX model of melanoma to test its sensitivity to VEM combined with S. typhimurium A1-R compared to VEM alone and VEM combined with COB. VEM combined with S. typhimurium A1-R was significantly more effective than VEM alone or VEM combined with COB (P = 0.0216) which is currently first line therapy for advanced melanoma with a BRAF-V600E mutation. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 2314-2319, 2017.Entities:
Keywords: COBIMETINIB; COMBINATION THERAPY; DRUG-RESPONSE; MELANOMA; NUDE MICE; ORTHOTOPIC; PDOX; PRECISION MEDICINE; Salmonella typhimurium A1-R; TUMOR REGRESSION; VEMURAFENIB
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28106277 DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25886
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cell Biochem ISSN: 0730-2312 Impact factor: 4.429