| Literature DB >> 28106096 |
Peitao Liu1, Jingyan Zhang1, Daqiang Gao1, Weichun Ye2.
Abstract
Here, W(NxS1-x)2 nanoflowers were fabricated by simple sintering process. Photocatalytic activity results indicated our fabricatedEntities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28106096 PMCID: PMC5247754 DOI: 10.1038/srep40784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Schematic representation of the fabrication of W(NxS1−x)2 nanoflowers.
Figure 2(a) XRD patterns, (b) Raman spectra, and (c,d) SEM images of S1.2 and the Used.
Figure 3(a) TEM, (b) HRTEM, and (c–f) EDS mapping images of N-doped WS2 nanoflowers (S1.2).
Figure 4(a) Full range of the XPS spectrum, (b) XPS peaks of W 4f, (c) S 2p and (d) N 1s of N-doped WS2 nanoflowers. (e) N2 adsorption-desorption isotherm and (f) pore size distribution plot of N-doped WS2 nanoflowers (S1.2).
Figure 5(a) Visible-light-promoted photocatalytic degradation of RhB carried out by S 1.2 and the bulk. (b) UV-vis spectra of RhB solution degraded by S 1.2 after 70 minutes (RhB solution 20 mg l−1). (c) Reusability experiment for degradation of RhB by N-doped WS2 nanoflowers under visible light irradiation. (d) Photodegradation of RhB by S 0.3, S 0.6 and S 1.2 under visible light irradiation.
Figure 6(a) Transient photocurrent response of S 1.2. (b) Photocatalytic degradation of RhB over S 1.2 in the different conditions under visible light irradiation: adding 5 ml BQ, AO, and TBA.
Figure 7(a–c) UV-DRS spectrum of S 0.3, S 0.6 and S 1.2. (d,e) Valence-band XPS spectra of S 0.3, S 0.6 and S 1.2.
Figure 8The mechanism of charge separation and photoactivity of WS2 and N-doped WS2 nanoflowers under visible light irradiation.
Figure 9Photocatalytic degradation of RhB by N-doped WS2 nanoflowers (S1.2) and a-Fe2O3 heterostructure under visible light irradiation.
Inset shows the magnetic separation.