Literature DB >> 28105960

Accuracy of Prenatal Ultrasound in Detecting Growth Abnormalities in Triplets: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Cameron Sklar1, Maryna Yaskina2, Sue Ross1, Kentia Naud1.   

Abstract

Significant management decisions in triplet pregnancies are made based mainly on ultrasound measurements of fetal growth, although there is a paucity of data examining the accuracy of fetal weight measurements in these gestations. To evaluate accuracy of prenatal ultrasound to diagnose growth abnormalities (intrauterine growth restriction, severe growth discordance) in triplet pregnancies, a retrospective cohort study of 78 triplet pregnancies (234 fetuses) delivered at a single tertiary hospital from January 2004 to May 2015 was performed. Growth percentiles from the last ultrasound were derived from estimated fetal weight using Hadlock's formula for each triplet. Growth discordance was calculated for each triplet set using the formula {(estimated fetal weight largest triplet - estimated fetal weight smallest)/estimated fetal weight largest}. These estimations were compared to birth weights. Sensitivity of ultrasound to predict ≥1 growth restricted fetus in a triplet set was 55.6% [95% CI 35.3, 74.5]; specificity was 100% [95% CI 93.0, 100]; positive predictive value (PPV) 100% [95% CI 74.7, 100]; negative predictive value (NPV) 81.0% [95% CI 73.2, 85.7%]. Sensitivity of ultrasound to detect fetal growth discordance >25% in a triplet set was 80.0% [95% CI 44.4, 97.5], specificity 94.1% [95% CI 85.6, 98.4]; PPV 66.7% [95% CI 42.4, 84.5]; NPV 97.0% [95% CI 90.2, 99.1]. Prenatal ultrasound currently remains the most reliable tool to screen for growth anomalies in triplet pregnancies; however, it appears to have less than ideal sensitivity, missing a number of cases of intra-uterine growth restriction and significant growth discordance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  fetal growth restriction; growth discordance; triplets; ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28105960     DOI: 10.1017/thg.2016.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet        ISSN: 1832-4274            Impact factor:   1.587


  4 in total

1.  Diagnostic Value and High-Risk Factors of Two-Dimensional Ultrasonography Combined with Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Fetal Congenital Malformations.

Authors:  Xinyou Yu; Fang Liu; Wei Gao; Xiangrong Shi; Ruiping Lu; Lihua Pan
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2022-07-12       Impact factor: 2.809

2.  Diagnostic Value of Two-Dimensional plus Four-Dimensional Ultrasonography in Fetal Craniocerebral Anomalies.

Authors:  Yingjin Wang; Xiaoyuan Chen; Shujuan Zhong; Rong Zhang; Yanyan Pan; Peili An; Xinru Gao
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 1.429

3.  Prognostic Value of Doppler Ultrasound in Triplets Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Rita Zafra; Lauren Conway; Nadia Solomon
Journal:  J Investig Med High Impact Case Rep       Date:  2019 Jan-Dec

4.  Reliability of sonographic fetal weight estimation in triplet pregnancies: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Sophie Pils; Stephanie Springer; Rudolf Seemann; Verena Wehrmann; Christof Worda; Johannes Ott
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2018-03-17       Impact factor: 2.344

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.