Kjetil Boye1, Nina Louise Jebsen2, Olga Zaikova3, Heidi Knobel4, Ayca M Løndalen5, Clement S Trovik2, Odd R Monge2, Kirsten Sundby Hall1. 1. a Department of Oncology , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway. 2. b Department of Oncology , Haukeland University Hospital , Bergen , Norway. 3. c Department of Orthopaedic Surgery , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway. 4. d Department of Oncology , St Olav University Hospital , Trondheim , Norway. 5. e Department of Nuclear Medicine , Oslo University Hospital , Oslo , Norway.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Denosumab is a relatively new treatment option for patients with giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB). The purpose of this study was to report the results for patients treated in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified from the clinical databases at the Norwegian sarcoma reference centers. Data were retrieved from the clinical databases and supplemented by retrospective review of patient records. Denosumab was given as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with loading doses on day 8 and 15 in cycle 1. RESULTS: Eighteen patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified. Denosumab was given for recurrent disease in seven cases and as first-line treatment in 11 patients, of which 6 received therapy as part of a neoadjuvant/adjuvant strategy and 5 for surgically unsalvageable primary tumor. Ten of 12 patients with unresectable disease are still on denosumab without progression with median treatment duration of 41 months (range 18-60). Two patients discontinued treatment due to osteonecrosis of the jaw and reduced compliance, respectively. In the adjuvant group, four patients experienced disease recurrence after stopping denosumab. In three of six patients, the extent of surgery was reduced due to neoadjuvant therapy. Seventeen of 18 patients underwent response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT at median 4.7 weeks from starting denosumab. Median baseline SUVmax was 11.0 and median SUVmax at evaluation was 4.9 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide GCTB patient cohort, denosumab was an effective agent and durable responses were observed. Our results do not support the use of adjuvant therapy in routine clinical practice. 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a valuable tool for early response evaluation.
BACKGROUND:Denosumab is a relatively new treatment option for patients with giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB). The purpose of this study was to report the results for patients treated in Norway. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified from the clinical databases at the Norwegian sarcoma reference centers. Data were retrieved from the clinical databases and supplemented by retrospective review of patient records. Denosumab was given as a subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks with loading doses on day 8 and 15 in cycle 1. RESULTS: Eighteen patients treated with denosumab for GCTB were identified. Denosumab was given for recurrent disease in seven cases and as first-line treatment in 11 patients, of which 6 received therapy as part of a neoadjuvant/adjuvant strategy and 5 for surgically unsalvageable primary tumor. Ten of 12 patients with unresectable disease are still on denosumab without progression with median treatment duration of 41 months (range 18-60). Two patients discontinued treatment due to osteonecrosis of the jaw and reduced compliance, respectively. In the adjuvant group, four patients experienced disease recurrence after stopping denosumab. In three of six patients, the extent of surgery was reduced due to neoadjuvant therapy. Seventeen of 18 patients underwent response evaluation with 18F-FDG PET/CT at median 4.7 weeks from starting denosumab. Median baseline SUVmax was 11.0 and median SUVmax at evaluation was 4.9 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationwide GCTB patient cohort, denosumab was an effective agent and durable responses were observed. Our results do not support the use of adjuvant therapy in routine clinical practice. 18F-FDG PET/CT could be a valuable tool for early response evaluation.
Authors: Laura Campanacci; Andrea Sambri; Manuel Ricardo Medellin; Pietro Cimatti; Costantino Errani; Davide Maria Donati Journal: Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc Date: 2019-06-26 Impact factor: 1.511