Literature DB >> 28105713

Whole-remnant and maximum-voxel SPECT/CT dosimetry in 131 I-NaI treatments of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Pablo Mínguez1, Glenn Flux2, José Genollá3, Alejandro Delgado3, Emilia Rodeño3, Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the possible differences between SPECT/CT based whole-remnant and maximum-voxel dosimetry in patients receiving radio-iodine ablation treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).
METHODS: Eighteen DTC patients were administered 1.11 GBq of 131 I-NaI after near-total thyroidectomy and rhTSH stimulation. Two patients had two remnants, so in total dosimetry was performed for 20 sites. Three SPECT/CT scans were performed for each patient at 1, 2, and 3-7 days after administration. The activity, the remnant mass, and the maximum-voxel activity were determined from these images and from a recovery-coefficient curve derived from experimental phantom measurements. The cumulated activity was estimated using trapezoidal-exponential integration. Finally, the absorbed dose was calculated using S-values for unit-density spheres in whole-remnant dosimetry and S-values for voxels in maximum-voxel dosimetry.
RESULTS: The mean absorbed dose obtained from whole-remnant dosimetry was 40 Gy (range 2-176 Gy) and from maximum-voxel dosimetry 34 Gy (range 2-145 Gy). For any given patient, the activity concentrations for each of the three time-points were approximately the same for the two methods. The effective half-lives varied (R = 0.865), mainly due to discrepancies in estimation of the longer effective half-lives. On average, absorbed doses obtained from whole-remnant dosimetry were 1.2 ± 0.2 (1 SD) higher than for maximum-voxel dosimetry, mainly due to differences in theS-values. The method-related differences were however small in comparison to the wide range of absorbed doses obtained in patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Simple and consistent procedures for SPECT/CT based whole-volume and maximum-voxel dosimetry have been described, both based on experimentally determined recovery coefficients. Generally the results from the two approaches are consistent, although there is a small, systematic difference in the absorbed dose due to differences in the S-values, and some variability due to differences in the estimated effective half-lives, especially when the effective half-life is long. Irrespective of the method used, the patient absorbed doses obtained span over two orders of magnitude.
© 2016 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  131I-NaI; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers; Calibration; Cameras; Cancer; Dose-volume analysis; Dosimetry; Dosimetry/exposure assessment; Germanium; Measuring radioactive content of objects, e.g. contamination (whole-body counters G01T011/63); Medical image spatial resolution; Numerical differentiation and integration; Radiation therapy; Scintigraphy; Single photon emission computed tomography; Single photon emission computed tomographyzzm321990(SPECT); Spatial resolution; Therapeutic applications, including brachytherapy; Tissues; biological organs; cancer; differentiated thyroid carcinoma; dosimetry; integration; iodine; phantoms; radiation therapy; single photon emission computed tomography; sodium compounds; thyroid bed remnants; tumours

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28105713     DOI: 10.1118/1.4961742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  3 in total

1.  EANM practical guidance on uncertainty analysis for molecular radiotherapy absorbed dose calculations.

Authors:  Jonathan I Gear; Maurice G Cox; Johan Gustafsson; Katarina Sjögreen Gleisner; Iain Murray; Gerhard Glatting; Mark Konijnenberg; Glenn D Flux
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Two decades of SPECT/CT - the coming of age of a technology: An updated review of literature evidence.

Authors:  Ora Israel; O Pellet; L Biassoni; D De Palma; E Estrada-Lobato; G Gnanasegaran; T Kuwert; C la Fougère; G Mariani; S Massalha; D Paez; F Giammarile
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Comparison between planar and single-photon computed tomography images for radiation intensity quantification in iodine-131 scintigraphy.

Authors:  Yusuke Iizuka; Tomohiro Katagiri; Minoru Inoue; Kiyonao Nakamura; Takashi Mizowaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.