Literature DB >> 28105543

A simple DNA recombination screening method by RT-PCR as an alternative to Southern blot.

Eliene Albers1, Mauro Sbroggiò1, Javier Martin-Gonzalez2, Alexandra Avram1, Stephanie Munk1, Andres J Lopez-Contreras3.   

Abstract

The generation of genetically engineered mouse models (GEMMs), including knock-out (KO) and knock-in (KI) models, often requires genomic screening of many mouse ES cell (mESC) clones by Southern blot. The use of large targeting constructs facilitates the recombination of exogenous DNA in a specific genomic locus, but limits the detection of its correct genomic integration by standard PCR methods. Genomic Long Range PCR (LR-PCR), using primers adjacent to the homology arms, has been used as an alternative to radioactive-based Southern blot screenings. However, LR-PCRs are often difficult and render many false positive and false negative results. Here, we propose an alternative screening method based on the detection of a genetic modification at the mRNA level, which we successfully optimized in two mouse models. This screening method consists of a reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR) using primers that match exons flanking the targeting construct. The detection of the expected modification in this PCR product confirms the integration at the correct genomic location and shows that the mutant mRNA is expressed. This is a simple and sensitive strategy to screen locus-specific recombination of targeting constructs which can also be useful to screen KO and KI mutant mice or cell lines including those generated by CRISPR/Cas9.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RT-PCR; Southern blot; Transgenic mouse; mESC screening

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28105543     DOI: 10.1007/s11248-017-0008-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transgenic Res        ISSN: 0962-8819            Impact factor:   2.788


  9 in total

Review 1.  Potential pitfalls of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing.

Authors:  Rongxue Peng; Guigao Lin; Jinming Li
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.542

Review 2.  Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jennifer A Doudna; Emmanuelle Charpentier
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Analysis of any point mutation in DNA. The amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS).

Authors:  C R Newton; A Graham; L E Heptinstall; S J Powell; C Summers; N Kalsheker; J C Smith; A F Markham
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-04-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Rapid confirmation of gene targeting in embryonic stem cells using two long-range PCR techniques.

Authors:  J M Lay; L Friis-Hansen; P J Gillespie; L C Samuelson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Gene targeting in mice: functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Mario R Capecchi
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  An improved protocol to increase sensitivity of Southern blot using dig-labelled DNA probes.

Authors:  M Solanas; E Escrich
Journal:  J Biochem Biophys Methods       Date:  1997-12-03

7.  Overview: generation of gene knockout mice.

Authors:  Bradford Hall; Advait Limaye; Ashok B Kulkarni
Journal:  Curr Protoc Cell Biol       Date:  2009-09

8.  The knockout mouse project.

Authors:  Christopher P Austin; James F Battey; Allan Bradley; Maja Bucan; Mario Capecchi; Francis S Collins; William F Dove; Geoffrey Duyk; Susan Dymecki; Janan T Eppig; Franziska B Grieder; Nathaniel Heintz; Geoff Hicks; Thomas R Insel; Alexandra Joyner; Beverly H Koller; K C Kent Lloyd; Terry Magnuson; Mark W Moore; Andras Nagy; Jonathan D Pollock; Allen D Roses; Arthur T Sands; Brian Seed; William C Skarnes; Jay Snoddy; Philippe Soriano; David J Stewart; Francis Stewart; Bruce Stillman; Harold Varmus; Lyuba Varticovski; Inder M Verma; Thomas F Vogt; Harald von Melchner; Jan Witkowski; Richard P Woychik; Wolfgang Wurst; George D Yancopoulos; Stephen G Young; Brian Zambrowicz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Rapid generation of mouse models with defined point mutations by the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Masafumi Inui; Mami Miyado; Maki Igarashi; Moe Tamano; Atsushi Kubo; Satoshi Yamashita; Hiroshi Asahara; Maki Fukami; Shuji Takada
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Loss of PICH Results in Chromosomal Instability, p53 Activation, and Embryonic Lethality.

Authors:  Eliene Albers; Mauro Sbroggiò; David Pladevall-Morera; Anna H Bizard; Alexandra Avram; Patricia Gonzalez; Javier Martin-Gonzalez; Ian D Hickson; Andres J Lopez-Contreras
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 9.423

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.