| Literature DB >> 28105163 |
Anna Andreevna Nemudraya1, Elena Vladimirovna Kuligina1, Alexandr Alexeevich Ilyichev2, Alexandr Sergeevich Fomin1, Grigory Alexandrovich Stepanov1, Anna Valentinovna Savelyeva1, Olga Alexandrovna Koval3, Vladimir Alexandrovich Richter1.
Abstract
It has been previously demonstrated that lactaptin, the proteolytic fragment of human milk protein κ-casein, induces the death of various cultured cancer cells. The recombinant analog of lactaptin, RL2, effectively induces the apoptosis of mouse hepatocarcinoma-1 (HA-1) tumor cells in vitro and suppress the growth of HA-1 tumors and metastases in vivo. The antitumor drug Lactaptin developed on the basis of RL2 has been successful in preclinical trials. Lactaptin shows its efficiency in relation to mouse and human cancer cells and tumors. However, Lactaptin, as with the majority of protein-based therapeutic drugs, is distributed evenly throughout the organism, which reduces its antitumor efficacy. To develop the targeted delivery of lactaptin, the present study selected tumor-specific peptides by screening a phage display peptide library in vivo on A/Sn strain mice with subcutaneously transplanted HA-1 cells. Two genetic constructs were made for the production of recombinant fusion proteins composed of RL2 and the selected tumor-targeting peptide. In vitro experiments involving HA-1, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cells cultures demonstrated that the fusion proteins induce apoptotic death in mouse and human tumor cells, as with RL2. The in vivo experiments involving the mouse HA-1 tumor model demonstrated that the tumor fluorescence intensity of the Cy5-fusion protein conjugates is higher than that of RL2-Cy5. As conjugation of the tumor-specific peptides to RL2 provided retention of RL2 in the tumor tissues, fusion proteins composed of lactaptin and peptides specific for human tumors are deemed promising to improve the antitumor efficiency of lactaptin.Entities:
Keywords: apoptosis; fusion proteins; lactaptin; targeted delivery; tumor-specific peptides
Year: 2016 PMID: 28105163 PMCID: PMC5228560 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.5266
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 2.967
Sequences of the oligonucleotides used in the construction of plasmid DNA-expressing fusion proteins.
| Oligonucleotide | Sequence (5′→3′) |
|---|---|
| RL2_F | AACCAGAAACAACCAGCATGCCATGAGAATGAT |
| c1_RL2_R | CATCATGGATCCTTAGTGATGGTGATGGTGATGTGATCCGCCGATGGT |
| c1_RL2_F | CATCATCCATGGGTTTGCATACTTCGGCT |
| c1_R | CTGGTTGTTTCTGGTTCGAACCTCACCAGCAA |
| ClonN1_target | GGTTTGCATACTTCGGCTACTAATCTGTATTTGCATGGTGGAGGTTCG |
| c2_RL2_F | CATCATCCATGGGCAGTGGTGTGTATAAGGTT |
| c2_R | TGGTTGTTTCTGGTTCGAACCTCCACCATGCT |
| ClonN2_target | AGTGGTGTGTATAAGGTTGCGTATGATTGGCAGCATGGTGGAGGTTCG |
Sequences and frequencies of displayed peptides isolated after the third and fourth rounds of in vivo selection using A/Sn strain mice with subcutaneously transplanted HA-1 tumors.
| Peptide sequence | Frequency, % |
|---|---|
| III round | 35.1 |
| GLHTSATNLYLH[ | 21.6 |
| SGVYKVAYDWQH[ | 5.4 |
| GSAPLLTVDTSK | 2.7 |
| GRIEPHRLFQGA | 2.7 |
| QFDYMRPANDTH | 2.7 |
| LGSSHGHGASHQ | 2.7 |
| DRWVARDPASIF[ | 2.7 |
| YASDLQPLTQFI | 2.7 |
| STSDYTQWTSYA | 2.7 |
| YGHGLNQAELRQ | 2.7 |
| GDGNSVLKPGNW | 2.7 |
| GTGLVTLPRLTV | 2.7 |
| DLGRASWNPFFS | 2.7 |
| ANLTRWPHNVST | 2.7 |
| DVSTYKTNAQNS | 2.7 |
| NWSHNVRLNYTY | 2.7 |
| NTNYVTWSPSSR | 35.1 |
| IV round | |
| GLHTSATNLYLH[ | 63.2 |
| SGVYKVAYDWQH[ | 21.1 |
| MHPNAGHGSLMR | 5.3 |
| SFKIPYHYDSGQ | 2.6 |
| DRWVARDPASIF[ | 2.6 |
| ENLMHADKNFRS | 2.6 |
| LQSTSPAYTHRM | 2.6 |
| GDGNSVLKPGNW | 2.6 |
Peptides discussed in the main text.
Figure 1.Relative binding (% of total) of the bacteriophages displaying the peptides GLHTSATNLYLH and SGVYKVAYDWQH, and the control bacteriophage (displaying neither) to different types of tumors and the control organs (liver and lung). Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation. *P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.
Figure 2.A schematic of the DNA sequence encoding a fusion protein.
Figure 3.Changes in the viability of HA-1, MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 tumor cells induced by RL2, T1_RL and T2_RL. Tumor cell viability was determined relative to the viability of the control cells (incubated without the proteins) (mean ± standard deviation) in three independent experiments.
Figure 4.Results of flow cytofluorometry with MDA-MB-231 cells after incubation with RL2, T1_RL and T2_RL (0.6 mg/ml) for 18 h. (A) Staining with FITC-labeled Annexin/PI cells. Q1 (FITC−/PI+), cell debris; Q2 (FITC+/PI+), necrotic cells or late apoptotic cells; Q3 (FITC−/PI−), viable cells; and Q4 (FITC+/PI−), apoptotic cells. (B) FITC-positive cells expressing active forms of caspase-3 and −7. FITC, fluorescein isothiocyanate; PI, propidium iodide.
Figure 5.Macroscopic fluorescent images of tumors.