Literature DB >> 28104408

Adding simultaneous stimulating channels to reduce power consumption in cochlear implants.

Florian Langner1, Aniket A Saoji2, Andreas Büchner3, Waldo Nogueira3.   

Abstract

Sound coding strategies for Cochlear Implant (CI) listeners can be used to control the trade-off between speech performance and power consumption. Most commercial CI strategies use non-simultaneous channel stimulation, stimulating only one electrode at a time. One could add parallel simultaneous stimulating channels such that the electrical interaction between channels is increased. This would produce spectral smearing, because the electrical fields of the simultaneous stimulated channels interact, but also power savings. The parallel channels produce a louder sensation than sequential stimulation. To test this hypothesis we implemented different sound coding strategies using a research interface from Advanced Bionics: the commercial F120 strategy using sequential channel stimulation (one channel equals two electrodes with current steering) and the Paired strategy, consisting of simultaneous stimulation with two channels. Here, the electrical field of both channels will interact, requiring less current on each channel to perceive the same loudness as with F120. However, channel interaction between the independent channels may reduce speech recognition or understanding. This can be diminished by adding an inverse-polarity stimulation channel between both channels. This strategy is termed Paired with Flanks. Additionally, Triplet with three channels and an adjacent Flank style was investigated. For each strategy we measured speech intelligibility with the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentence test. Spectral resolution was assessed using a spectral modulation depth detection task. Results show that Paired without Flanks obtains similar performance while reducing the current by 20% on average compared to F120. Triplet with and without Flanks shows overall poorer performance when compared to F120. All strategies inhibit the option to increase the pulse width which would result in even further decreased power consumption.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Cochlear implants; Power savings; Simultaneous stimulation; Spectral resolution; Speech intelligibility

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28104408     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.01.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the Spectral-Temporally Modulated Ripple Test With the Arizona Biomedical Institute Sentence Test in Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Marshall Lawler; Jeffrey Yu; Justin M Aronoff
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The effect of a coding strategy that removes temporally masked pulses on speech perception by cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Wiebke Lamping; Tobias Goehring; Jeremy Marozeau; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Alan W Archer-Boyd; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A sound coding strategy based on a temporal masking model for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Eugen Kludt; Waldo Nogueira; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Assessing the relationship between neural health measures and speech performance with simultaneous electric stimulation in cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Florian Langner; Julie G Arenberg; Andreas Büchner; Waldo Nogueira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Cochlear Implant Research and Development in the Twenty-first Century: A Critical Update.

Authors:  Robert P Carlyon; Tobias Goehring
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-08-25

7.  Using Spectral Blurring to Assess Effects of Channel Interaction on Speech-in-Noise Perception with Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Tobias Goehring; Julie G Arenberg; Robert P Carlyon
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.