| Literature DB >> 28104301 |
Mark Haas1, James Mirocha2, Nancy L Reinsmoen3, Ashley A Vo4, Jua Choi4, Joseph M Kahwaji4, Alice Peng4, Rafael Villicana5, Stanley C Jordan4.
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allografts occurs in two forms. Type 1 ABMR results from persistence and/or a rebound of preexisting donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients and usually occurs early post-transplantation. Type 2 ABMR is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies and usually occurs over one year post-transplantation. It is generally accepted that types 1 and 2 also differ with regard to certain pathologic features including the frequencies of C4d positivity and concurrent cell-mediated rejection. However, direct comparison of pathologic, serologic, and clinical features of types 1 and 2 ABMR is lacking. Here we compared these features in 80 cases of ABMR (37 type 1, 43 type 2) diagnosed at our center. Compared with type 1, type 2 ABMR occurred later post-transplantation, was more often associated with donor-specific antibodies against Class II HLA, and was associated with more interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and more frequent cell-mediated rejection, although these did not differ with respect to C4d positivity. By univariate analysis, graft survival was lower with type 2 than type 1 ABMR with borderline significance. Still, among these 80 patients, all but one treated for ABMR following diagnosis, the only two independent predictors of graft failure were at least moderate interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and failure of the donor-specific antibody relative intensity scale score, a measure of the combined strength of all donor-specific antibodies present, to decrease in response to therapy.Entities:
Keywords: Banff classification; C4d; antibody-mediated rejection; cell-mediated rejection; donor-specific antibodies; renal transplant
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28104301 DOI: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Kidney Int ISSN: 0085-2538 Impact factor: 10.612