Literature DB >> 2810416

Operative splenic salvage in adults: a decade perspective.

B Pickhardt1, E E Moore, F A Moore, B L McCroskey, G E Moore.   

Abstract

The immunologic value of the spleen is now unchallenged; recognition of this fact has changed the management of splenic trauma radically over the past decade. This review describes our clinical experience in adults during this metamorphosis. In the 10-year period ending December 1987, 314 adults had splenic injury identified at emergent laparotomy. Mean patient age was 30.1 years and 81% were men. Injury mechanism was blunt in 227 (72%), stab wound in 49, and gunshot wound in 38. In 1978 splenorrhaphy was accomplished in nine (29%) of 31 patients; during 1982-1987 the rate of operative splenic salvage has been 63% (107/170). Splenorrhaphy was achieved with hemostatic agents in 40%, debridement and suturing in 40%, formal splenic resection in 13%, and mesh bag in 7%. Grade I splenic injuries were amendable to hemostatic agents alone, and suturing or mesh enclosure was necessary in 43% of Grade II and in all Grade III injuries. Grade IV disruption required anatomic splenic resection for hemorrhage control in 88% of the cases. During this period 63 patients underwent splenectomy; 48 (76%) had Grade V injuries that were technically unapproachable. The remaining splenectomies were performed expeditiously in multisystem injured patients harboring other critical injuries. This decade perspective documents the feasibility of operative splenic salvage in nearly two thirds of acutely injured adults. Conversely, more than one third require prompt splenectomy due to massive splenic disruption or the presence of concomitant life-threatening injuries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2810416     DOI: 10.1097/00005373-198910000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  8 in total

1.  An experimental rat model of hilar splenic vessel ligation versus splenectomy for spleen trauma.

Authors:  Shaban Mehrvarz; Shahab Shahabi; Rastin Mohammadi Mofrad; Erfan Sheikhbahaei; Masoud Moslehi
Journal:  Int J Burns Trauma       Date:  2018-10-20

Review 2.  Conservative management of splenic trauma: history and current trends.

Authors:  P Upadhyaya
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2003-11-12       Impact factor: 1.827

3.  Evaluation of splenic injury by computed tomography and its impact on treatment.

Authors:  M A Malangoni; J I Cué; M E Fallat; S J Willing; J D Richardson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Experience with selective operative and nonoperative treatment of splenic injuries in 193 patients.

Authors:  H L Pachter; F C Spencer; S R Hofstetter; H G Liang; J Hoballah; G F Coppa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Splenorrhaphy. The alternative.

Authors:  D V Feliciano; V Spjut-Patrinely; J M Burch; K L Mattox; C G Bitondo; P Cruse-Martocci; G L Jordan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Abdominal trauma revisited.

Authors:  W A Goins; B B Anderson
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 7.  Continuing evolution in the approach to severe liver trauma.

Authors:  R L Reed; R C Merrell; W C Meyers; R P Fischer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Non operative management of liver and spleen traumatic injuries: a giant with clay feet.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Ernest E Moore; Gregorio Tugnoli; Noel Naidoo; Luca Ansaloni; Stefano Bonilauri; Michele Cucchi; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 5.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.