Robert A Keller1, Nima Mehran2, Nathan E Marshall3, Kelechi R Okoroha3, Lafi Khalil4, James E Tibone2, Vasilios Moutzouros3. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. Electronic address: robkeller23@gmail.com. 2. Kerlan Jobe Orthopaedic Clinic, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 3. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA. 4. Wayne State University Medical School, Detroit, MI, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Literature has attempted to correlate pitching workload with risk of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury; however, limited data are available in evaluating workload and its relationship with the need for revision reconstruction in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. METHODS: We identified 29 MLB pitchers who underwent primary UCL reconstruction surgery and subsequently required revision reconstruction and compared them with 121 MLB pitchers who underwent primary reconstruction but did not later require revision surgery. Games pitched, pitch counts, and innings pitched were evaluated and compared for the seasons after returning from primary reconstruction and for the last season pitched before undergoing revision surgery. RESULTS: The difference in workload between pitchers who did and did not require revision reconstruction was not statistically significant in games pitched, innings pitched, and MLB-only pitch counts. The one significant difference in workload was in total pitch counts (combined MLB and minor league), with the pitchers who required revision surgery pitching less than those who did not (primary: 1413.6 pitches vs. revision: 959.0 pitches, P = .04). In addition, pitchers who required revision surgery underwent primary reconstruction at an early age (22.9 years vs. 27.3 years, P < .001) and had less MLB experience (1.5 years vs. 5.0 years, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no specific number of pitches, innings, or games that place a pitcher at an increase risk for injury after primary UCL reconstruction. However, correlations of risk may be younger age and less MLB experience at the time of the primary reconstruction.
BACKGROUND: Literature has attempted to correlate pitching workload with risk of ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) injury; however, limited data are available in evaluating workload and its relationship with the need for revision reconstruction in Major League Baseball (MLB) pitchers. METHODS: We identified 29 MLB pitchers who underwent primary UCL reconstruction surgery and subsequently required revision reconstruction and compared them with 121 MLB pitchers who underwent primary reconstruction but did not later require revision surgery. Games pitched, pitch counts, and innings pitched were evaluated and compared for the seasons after returning from primary reconstruction and for the last season pitched before undergoing revision surgery. RESULTS: The difference in workload between pitchers who did and did not require revision reconstruction was not statistically significant in games pitched, innings pitched, and MLB-only pitch counts. The one significant difference in workload was in total pitch counts (combined MLB and minor league), with the pitchers who required revision surgery pitching less than those who did not (primary: 1413.6 pitches vs. revision: 959.0 pitches, P = .04). In addition, pitchers who required revision surgery underwent primary reconstruction at an early age (22.9 years vs. 27.3 years, P < .001) and had less MLB experience (1.5 years vs. 5.0 years, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: There is no specific number of pitches, innings, or games that place a pitcher at an increase risk for injury after primary UCL reconstruction. However, correlations of risk may be younger age and less MLB experience at the time of the primary reconstruction.
Authors: Lafi S Khalil; Toufic R Jildeh; Joseph S Tramer; Muhammad J Abbas; Luke Hessburg; Nima Mehran; Kelechi R Okoroha Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-11-30
Authors: Bhavik H Patel; Kelechi R Okoroha; Toufic R Jildeh; Yining Lu; Alexander J Idarraga; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Sarek A Shen; Brian Forsythe Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-06-27
Authors: Grant H Garcia; Anirudh K Gowd; Brandon C Cabarcas; Joseph N Liu; John R Meyer; Gregory M White; Anthony A Romeo; Nikhil N Verma Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-01-29
Authors: Christopher L Camp; Vishal Desai; Stan Conte; Christopher S Ahmad; Michael Ciccotti; Joshua S Dines; David W Altchek; John D'Angelo; Timothy B Griffith Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-08-14
Authors: Amanda Esquivel; Michael T Freehill; Frank C Curriero; Kevin L Rand; Stan Conte; Thomas Tedeschi; Stephen E Lemos Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-12-27
Authors: Lafi S Khalil; Robert N Matar; Tahsin Rahman; Sreten Franovic; Muhammad J Abbas; Luke Hessburg; Nima Mehran; Kelechi R Okoroha Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-11-20
Authors: Michael H McGraw; Michael Vrla; Dean Wang; Christopher L Camp; John M Zajac; Dave Pearson; Alec A Sinatro; Joshua S Dines; Struan H Coleman Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-02-08
Authors: Toufic R Jildeh; Kelechi R Okoroha; Joseph S Tramer; Jorge Chahla; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Shawn Annin; Vasilios Moutzouros; Charles Bush-Joseph; Nikhil Verma Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2019-12-26
Authors: Toufic R Jildeh; Fabien Meta; Jacob Young; Brendan Page; Benedict Nwachukwu; Robert W Westermann; Kelechi R Okoroha Journal: Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil Date: 2020-12-27