Literature DB >> 28103499

Incarcerated incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon after appendectomy: A case report.

Pyong Wha Choi1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Incisional hernia after appendectomy is rare, affecting 0.4% to 0.9% of cases. The small bowel and omentum are commonly herniated through the abdominal wall defect, but incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon is extremely rare. CASE
PRESENTATION: A 78-year-old man presented with a right lower quadrant abdominal wall mass on the previous McBurney incision site. He had a history of appendectomy for appendicitis 40 years ago. Computed tomography (CT) showed the sigmoid colon herniated thorough the abdominal wall defect. During the operation, a feces-impacted sigmoid colon was found protruding through the defect of the abdominal wall. Reduction of the sigmoid colon into the peritoneal cavity and herniorrhaphy with primary repair were performed. DISCUSSION: The ascending and descending colon are fixed into the retroperitoneum, whereas the transverse and sigmoid colon are not, which can allow these bowel segments to herniate through a weak abdominal wall just as small bowel loops do. However, incisional hernia of the colon is extremely rare. The diagnosis of incisional hernia can be easily made because a reducible abdominal wall mass can be detected by physical examination. In cases with rare type of hernia, CT can identify unusual types of abdominal hernias and differentiate hernias from neoplasms, inflammatory disease, and hematoma.
CONCLUSION: Although incisional hernia of the colon after appendectomy is extremely rare and preoperative diagnosis by physical examination is difficult, CT is a useful method to make the correct diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary invasive intervention, particularly in patients with an unusual abdominal wall mass.
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Appendectomy; Colon; Incisional hernia

Year:  2017        PMID: 28103499      PMCID: PMC5241580          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep        ISSN: 2210-2612


Introduction

Incisional hernia after appendectomy is very rare, with a prevalence rate of 0.4% to 0.9% [1]. The most common contents of the sac of incisional hernias are the small bowel or omentum because these organs are freely movable in the peritoneal cavity, but colonic herniation through the abdominal wall defect is extremely rare irrespective of previous incision type. Here, we present a case of a 78-year-old man with an abdominal wall mass that was determined to be post-appendectomy incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon [2].

Presentation of case

A 78-year-old man, presenting with a right lower quadrant abdominal wall mass, was admitted to the Department of Surgery, Inje University, College of Medicine, Ilsan Paik Hospital. The mass was first detected 3 months ago, but there were no associated obstructive bowel symptoms such as abdominal distension, pain, and constipation. He had a history of appendectomy for appendicitis 40 years ago, and well-controlled diabetes mellitus diagnosed 10 years ago. At that time of appendectomy, appendicitis was uncomplicated. So, simple appendectomy was performed without drain. He was discharged from the hospital on the 2th postoperative day without complications, and returned to work (a night guard) after 1 week postoperatively. On admission, his vital signs were stable and laboratory results were within normal limits. Physical examination revealed a 3 cm × 3 cm irreducible subcutaneous soft and movable mass on the previous McBurney incision scar, with a base fixed into the deep abdominal wall. There was no tenderness, rebound tenderness, redness, or heat, but the patient complained of localized pain when the abdominal wall mass was squeezed. A neoplastic lesion such as a desmoid tumor or lipoma was considered as a presumptive clinical diagnosis based on physical examination. However, a computed tomography (CT) showed the sigmoid colon herniated through the abdominal wall defect without ischemic changes, indicating an incarcerated incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon (Fig. 1). During the operation, after sharp and blunt dissection of the mass in the subcutaneous layer, an incarcerated sigmoid colon, which was impacted with hard stool, was identified (Fig. 2). Reduction of the sigmoid colon into the peritoneal cavity and herniorrhaphy with primary repair were performed. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 4th postoperative day without complications.
Fig. 1

Abdominal computed tomography shows herniation of the sigmoid colon through the defect of the right low quadrant abdominal wall (arrow). a: axial image, b: coronal image.

Fig. 2

Operative findings. Herniated sigmoid colon is shown after blunt and sharp dissection of the abdominal wall beneath the McBurney incision scar.

Discussion

Incisional hernia is one of the late complications of open abdominal or, rarely, laparoscopic surgery. Many factors can have an effect on the development of incisional hernia including old age, male, obesity, steroid use, diabetes mellitus, inept surgical technique, and postoperative wound infection [3], [4]. Other than these risk factors, the length of the incision is closely related to the occurrence of this type of hernia. In open abdominal surgery, incisional hernias following major abdominal surgery requiring a long incision and a long operative time is more common than those following minor surgery. Appendectomy is a common and representative minor surgery with a small incision although some severe cases require bowel resection, a long incision, and a prolonged operative time. Incisional hernia after appendectomy is very rare, affecting less than 1% of cases [1]. The small bowel and omentum are commonly herniated organs, but unusual organs such as the bladder and colon may herniate through the abdominal wall defect [5], [6], [7], [8]. The ascending and descending colon are fixed into the retroperitoneum, whereas the transverse and sigmoid colon are not, which can allow these bowel segments to herniate through a weak abdominal wall just as small bowel loops do. In the present case, although the patient had several risk factors for incisional hernia such as old age, male, and diabetes mellitus, incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon is rare because the radius of the colon is larger than that of the small bowel and the colon is less redundant. Moreover, since the muscles in the abdominal wall play an important role in preventing herniation following a McBurney incision, the present case is extremely rare when considering the probability of colonic incisional hernia through a McBurney incision following appendectomy [5]. In the English literature, the present case is the fourth case of incisional hernia of the colon after abdominal surgery (Table 1) and the first case of incisional hernia of the colon after appendectomy. Unlike the present case, all previous patients with incisional colonic hernias were women, and the transverse colon was herniated in all cases. Among them, the symptoms of two cases were associated with colonic strangulation and perforation.
Table 1

Clinical features of incisional hernia of the colon after abdominal surgery in the English literature.

Author (year)Age/sexPrevious surgeryIntervalPresenting withHerniated colonEmergency/Elective operationPerformed surgeryRemark
Montecamozzo G. et al. (2008) [5]75/FUmbilical hernia repairNASeptic shock, abdominal pain.Ascending and transverseEmergency for colon perforationRight hemicolectomy, small bowel resections, and ileostomyDefect of the abdominal wall was treated with vacuum assisted closure (VAC) therapy
Yamamoto T. et al. (2013) [6]75/FIncisional hernia repair for right partial nephrectomy3 yearsRight flank painTransverseElectiveReduction of the colon and herniorrhaphy with meshNone
Min-Po Ho. et al. (2016) [7]78/FBariatric surgery10 yearsProtruding massTransverseEmergency for colon perforationTransverse colon resection and primary anastomosis, herniorrhaphy with primary suturePostoperative wound leakage and epidermal fistula formation
Present case(2016)78/MAppendectomy40 yearsAbdominal wall massSigmoidElectiveReduction of the colon and herniorrhaphy with primary sutureNone

NA = No available information.

The diagnosis of incisional hernia without incarceration or strangulation can be easily made because a reducible abdominal wall mass can be detected by physical examination. However, in cases with incarceration or strangulation, CT may be necessary to obtain the correct diagnosis and provide prompt treatment to reduce the morbidity and mortality. CT can identify unusual types of abdominal hernias and differentiate hernias from neoplasms, inflammatory disease, and hematomas [9]. In the present case, the presumptive diagnoses of the abdominal wall mass were desmoid tumor or lipoma, and sonography-guided needle biopsy was scheduled for a neoplastic lesion. However, after confirming the diagnosis through CT, we could prevent any morbidity that could have been caused by sonography-guided biopsy. There are two types of incisional hernia after appendectomy; one is a common type of hernia through all of the abdominal wall layers, and the other is the less common interstitial type. The external oblique aponeurosis is intact, but herniation occurs through a defect of the transverses abdominis and internal oblique muscles, so the protruding hernia sac can be detected beneath the external oblique aponeurosis [10]. Although the present case is the more common type of whole wall hernia after appendectomy, making a diagnosis of colonic incisional hernia was not easy prior to CT because of the rarity of the case.

Conclusion

We herein reported a case of an incisional hernia of the sigmoid colon following appendectomy. Although incisional hernia of the colon after appendectomy is extremely rare and preoperative diagnosis by physical examination is difficult, CT is a useful method to make the correct diagnosis, avoiding unnecessary invasive intervention, particularly in patients with an unusual abdominal wall mass.

Conflict of interest

The author have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding

There was no funding for this research.

Ethical approval

There was no ethical approval required for this case.

Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication. A copy of the written consent is available on request.

Author contribution

Pyongwha Choi: study concept, design, and write the paper.

Guarantor

Pyongwha Choi.
  8 in total

1.  Abdominal wall hernias: MDCT findings.

Authors:  Diego A Aguirre; Giovanna Casola; Claude Sirlin
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 2.  CT diagnosis of postoperative abdominal complications.

Authors:  G G Ghahremani; R M Gore
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 3.  Incisional bladder hernia following appendectomy: report of a case.

Authors:  Shin Sasaki; Emi Miura; Hiroshi Nakayama; Toshiyuki Watanabe
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Incarcerated Incisional Hernia: Strangulated Transverse Colon with Perforation Associated with Abscess Formation.

Authors:  Min-Po Ho; An-Hsun Chou; Wing-Keung Cheung; Kuang-Chau Tsai
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.562

Review 5.  Small-bowel disorders and abdominal wall hernia in the elderly patient.

Authors:  R A Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Incarcerated massive incisional hernia: extensive necrosis of the colon in a very obese patient. Surgical treatment and vacuum-assisted closure therapy: a case report.

Authors:  G Montecamozzo; E Leopaldi; C Baratti; P Previde; F Ferla; M Pizzi; J Sposato; D Pariani; A Sartani; E Trabucchi
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Incisional intercostal hernia with prolapse of the colon after right partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Takatsugu Yamamoto; Yukiko Kurashima; Chie Watanabe; Kazunori Ohata; Ryoya Hashiba; Shogo Tanaka; Takahiro Uenishi; Koichi Ohno
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2013 Oct-Dec

8.  The SCARE Statement: Consensus-based surgical case report guidelines.

Authors:  Riaz A Agha; Alexander J Fowler; Alexandra Saeta; Ishani Barai; Shivanchan Rajmohan; Dennis P Orgill
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 6.071

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.