Literature DB >> 28102927

Complex abdominal wall reconstruction in the setting of active infection and contamination: a systematic review of hernia and fistula recurrence rates.

J D Hodgkinson1, Y Maeda1, C A Leo1, J Warusavitarne1, C J Vaizey1.   

Abstract

AIM: Minimal evidence exists to guide surgeons on the risk of complications when performing abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) in the presence of active infection, contamination or enterocutaneous fistula. This study aims to establish the outcomes of contaminated complex AWR.
METHOD: Analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Pubmed databases was performed. Studies reporting exclusively on single-staged repair of contaminated complex AWR were included. Pooled data were analysed to establish rates of complications.
RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included, consisting of 601 contaminated complex AWRs, of which 233 included concurrent enterocutaneous fistula repair. The average follow-up period was 26.7 months. There were 146 (24.3%) reported hernia recurrences. When stratified by repair method, suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (14.2%), followed by nonabsorbable synthetic mesh reinforcement (21.2%), biological mesh (25.8%) and absorbable synthetic mesh (53.1%). Hernia recurrence was higher when fascial closure was not achieved. Of the 233 enterocutaneous fistula repairs, fistula recurrence was seen in 24 patients (10.3%). Suture repair alone had the lowest rate of recurrence (1.6%), followed by nonbiological mesh (10.3%) and biological mesh reinforcement (12%). Forty-six per cent of patients were reported as having a wound-related complication and the mortality rate was 2.5%.
CONCLUSION: It is feasible to perform simultaneous enterocutaneous fistula repair and AWR as rates of recurrent fistula are comparable with series describing enterocutaneous fistula repair alone. Hernias recurred in nearly a quarter of cases. This analysis is limited by a lack of comparative data and variability of outcome reporting. Colorectal Disease
© 2017 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdominal wall reconstruction; complex ventral hernia; contamination; enterocutaneous fistula

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28102927     DOI: 10.1111/codi.13609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  15 in total

1.  Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia.

Authors:  Yohann Renard; Louis de Mestier; Julie Henriques; Paul de Boissieu; Philippe de Mestier; Abe Fingerhut; Jean-Pierre Palot; Reza Kianmanesh
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Frailty predicts morbidity, complications, and mortality in patients undergoing complex abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  W J Joseph; N G Cuccolo; M E Baron; I Chow; E H Beers
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.739

3.  Intraluminal mesh migration causing enteroenteric and enterocutaneous fistula: a case and discussion of the 'mesh problem'.

Authors:  Reeya Patel; Thomas H Reid; Sam G Parker; Alistair Windsor
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2018-04-17

Review 4.  Synthetic Mesh in Contaminated Abdominal Wall Surgery: Friend or Foe? A Literature Review.

Authors:  Emmanuel E Sadava; Camila Bras Harriott; Cristian A Angeramo; Francisco Schlottmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  The early outcomes of complex abdominal wall reconstruction with polyvinylidene (PVDF) mesh in the setting of active infection: a prospective series.

Authors:  Claudio Birolini; Eduardo Yassushi Tanaka; Jocielle Santos de Miranda; Abel Hiroshi Murakami; Sergio Henrique Bastos Damous; Edivaldo Massazo Utiyama
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Treatment of enterocutaneous fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Gefen; Z Garoufalia; P Zhou; K Watson; S H Emile; S D Wexner
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 3.699

Review 7.  Ventral hernia repair in high-risk patients and contaminated fields using a single mesh: proportional meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Morales-Conde; P Hernández-Granados; L Tallón-Aguilar; M Verdaguer-Tremolosa; M López-Cano
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 2.920

8.  Risk factors, outcomes, and complications associated with combined ventral hernia and enterocutaneous fistula single-staged abdominal wall reconstruction.

Authors:  K M Klifto; S Othman; C A Messa; W Piwnica-Worms; J P Fischer; S J Kovach
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 4.739

9.  Application of double circular suturing technique (DCST) in repair of giant incision hernias.

Authors:  Ying-Han Song; Wei-Jia Huang; Yan-Yan Xie; Gonish Hada; Sen Zhang; An-Qing Lu; Yong Wang; Wen-Zhang Lei
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

Review 10.  Assessment and management of patients with intestinal failure: a multidisciplinary approach.

Authors:  Jennie T Grainger; Yasuko Maeda; Suzanne C Donnelly; Carolynne J Vaizey
Journal:  Clin Exp Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-06-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.