Literature DB >> 28102500

Rates and Predictors of Caesarean Section for First and Second Births: A Prospective Cohort of Australian Women.

Alexis Hure1, Jennifer Powers2, Catherine Chojenta2, Deborah Loxton2.   

Abstract

Objective To determine rates of vaginal delivery, emergency caesarean section, and elective caesarean section for first and second births in Australia, and to identify maternal predictors of caesarean section. Methods Data were from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health. A total of 5275 women aged 18-38 years, who had given birth to their first child between 1996 and 2012 were included; 75.0% (n = 3956) had delivered a second child. Mode of delivery for first and second singleton birth(s) was obtained from longitudinal survey data. Socio-demographic, lifestyle, anthropometric and medical history variables were tested as predictors of mode of delivery for first and second births using multinomial logistic regression. Results Caesarean sections accounted for 29.1% (n = 1535) of first births, consisting of 18.2% emergency and 10.9% elective caesareans. Mode of delivery for first and second births was consistent for 85.5% of women (n = 3383) who delivered both children either vaginally or via caesarean section. Higher maternal age and body mass index, short-stature, anxiety and having private health insurance were predictive of caesarean section for first births. Vaginal birth after caesarean section was more common in women who were older, short-statured, or had been overweight or obese for both children, compared to women who had two vaginal deliveries. Conclusions for Practice Rates of caesarean section in Australia are high. Renewed efforts are needed to reduce the number of unnecessary caesarean births, with particular caution applied to first births. Interventions could focus on elective caesareans for women with private health insurance or a history of anxiety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Birth; Caesarean; Delivery; Elective; Emergency; Labour; Vaginal

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28102500     DOI: 10.1007/s10995-016-2216-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Matern Child Health J        ISSN: 1092-7875


  23 in total

1.  Fear of childbirth: predictors and temporal changes among nulliparous women in the Danish National Birth Cohort.

Authors:  M Laursen; M Hedegaard; C Johansen
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.531

2.  Intolerance of error and culture of blame drive medical excess.

Authors:  Jerome R Hoffman; Hemal K Kanzaria
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-10-14

3.  Rate of caesarean section is alarming in China.

Authors:  Jie Mi; Fangchao Liu
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Appropriate technology for birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-08-24       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The impact of attrition in an 11-year prospective longitudinal study of younger women.

Authors:  Jennifer Powers; Deborah Loxton
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 3.797

6.  Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment.

Authors:  David M Studdert; Michelle M Mello; William M Sage; Catherine M DesRoches; Jordon Peugh; Kinga Zapert; Troyen A Brennan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Prospective study of physical activity and depressive symptoms in middle-aged women.

Authors:  Wendy J Brown; Jessica H Ford; Nicola W Burton; Alison L Marshall; Annette J Dobson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Agreement between hospital records and maternal recall of mode of delivery: evidence from 12 391 deliveries in the UK Millennium Cohort Study.

Authors:  M A Quigley; C Hockley; L L Davidson
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 6.531

9.  Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08.

Authors:  Pisake Lumbiganon; Malinee Laopaiboon; A Metin Gülmezoglu; João Paulo Souza; Surasak Taneepanichskul; Pang Ruyan; Deepika Eranjanie Attygalle; Naveen Shrestha; Rintaro Mori; Duc Hinh Nguyen; Thi Bang Hoang; Tung Rathavy; Kang Chuyun; Kannitha Cheang; Mario Festin; Venus Udomprasertgul; Maria Julieta V Germar; Gao Yanqiu; Malabika Roy; Guillermo Carroli; Katherine Ba-Thike; Ekaterina Filatova; José Villar
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Planned vaginal birth or elective repeat caesarean: patient preference restricted cohort with nested randomised trial.

Authors:  Caroline A Crowther; Jodie M Dodd; Janet E Hiller; Ross R Haslam; Jeffrey S Robinson
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of valued obstetric and gynecologic (OB/GYN) procedures in resource-poor areas.

Authors:  Elizabeth Ellen Blears; Nguyen K Pham; Valerie P Bauer
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-12

2.  Racial disparities in caesarean delivery among nulliparous women that delivered at term: cross-sectional decomposition analysis of Nebraska birth records from 2005-2014.

Authors:  Corrine Hanson; Kaeli Samson; Ann L Anderson-Berry; Rebecca A Slotkowski; Dejun Su
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Promotion of Pre-natal Education Courses Is Associated With Reducing the Rates of Caesarean Section: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Yunhui Tang; Jing Gao; Liping Sun; Yifei Gao; Fang Guo; Qi Chen
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-05-28

4.  Maternal Diet Quality, Body Mass Index and Resource Use in the Perinatal Period: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Zoe Szewczyk; Natasha Weaver; Megan Rollo; Simon Deeming; Elizabeth Holliday; Penny Reeves; Clare Collins
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.717

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.