Literature DB >> 28102467

MyPOD: an EMR-Based Tool that Facilitates Quality Improvement and Maintenance of Certification.

Loren Berman1, Brian Duffy2, B Randall Brenn2, Charles Vinocur2.   

Abstract

Maintenance of Certification (MOC) was designed to assess physician competencies including operative case volume and outcomes. This information, if collected consistently and systematically, can be used to facilitate quality improvement. Information automatically extracted from the electronic medical record (EMR) can be used as a prompt to compile these data. We developed an EMR-based program called MyPOD (My Personal Outcomes Data) to track surgical outcomes at our institution. We compared occurrences reported in the first 18 months to those captured in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric (ACS NSQIP-P) over the same time period. During the first 18 months of using MyPOD, 691 cases were captured in both MyPOD and NSQIP-P. There were 48 cases with occurrences in NSQIP-P (6.9% occurrence rate). MyPOD captured 33% of the occurrences and 83% of the deaths reported in NSQIP-P. Use of the MyPOD program helped to identify series of complications and facilitated systematic change to improve outcomes. MyPOD provides comparative data that is essential in performance evaluation and facilitates quality improvement in surgery. This program and similar EMR-driven tools are becoming essential components of the MOC process. Our initial review has revealed opportunities for improvement in self-reporting which we can continue to measure by comparison to NSQIP-P. In addition, it has identified systems issues that have led to hospital-wide improvements.

Keywords:  Electronic medical record; Maintenance of certification; Morbidity and mortality; National surgical quality improvement program; Pediatric surgery; Quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28102467     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-017-0686-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  9 in total

Review 1.  Quality improvement in surgery: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program approach.

Authors:  Angela M Ingraham; Karen E Richards; Bruce L Hall; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2010

2.  Comparing performance of Morbidity and Mortality Conference and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program for detection of complications after urologic surgery.

Authors:  David C Miller; Chris P Filson; Lauren P Wallner; James E Montie; Darrell A Campbell; John T Wei
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a phase 1 report.

Authors:  Mehul V Raval; Peter W Dillon; Jennifer L Bruny; Clifford Y Ko; Bruce L Hall; R Lawrence Moss; Keith T Oldham; Karen E Richards; Charles D Vinocur; Moritz M Ziegler
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 6.113

4.  Identification of surgical complications and deaths: an assessment of the traditional surgical morbidity and mortality conference compared with the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutter; Katherine S Rowell; Lynn A Devaney; Suzanne M Sokal; Andrew L Warshaw; William M Abbott; Richard A Hodin
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-09-27       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Does surgical quality improve in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: an evaluation of all participating hospitals.

Authors:  Bruce L Hall; Barton H Hamilton; Karen Richards; Karl Y Bilimoria; Mark E Cohen; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Measuring postoperative complications in general surgery patients using an outcomes-based strategy: comparison with complications presented at morbidity and mortality rounds.

Authors:  L Feldman; J Barkun; A Barkun; J Sampalis; L Rosenberg
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Practice-based learning and improvement: a two-year experience with the reporting of morbidity and mortality cases by general surgery residents.

Authors:  John L Falcone; Kenneth K W Lee; Timothy R Billiar; Giselle G Hamad
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.891

8.  American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric: a beta phase report.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bruny; Bruce L Hall; Douglas C Barnhart; Deborah F Billmire; Mark S Dias; Peter W Dillon; Charles Fisher; Kurt F Heiss; William L Hennrikus; Clifford Y Ko; Lawrence Moss; Keith T Oldham; Karen E Richards; Rahul Shah; Charles D Vinocur; Moritz M Ziegler
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Informatics and the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: automated processes could replace manual record review.

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Michael J Englesbe; John A Cowan; Darrell A Campbell
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 6.113

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Providers preferences towards greater patient health benefit is associated with higher quality of care.

Authors:  Seema Kacker; Tin Aung; Dominic Montagu; David Bishai
Journal:  Int J Health Econ Manag       Date:  2021-06-04

2.  Pediatric Surgeon Perceptions of Participation in External Patient Safety Programs: impact on Patient Safety.

Authors:  Loren Berman; Shawn Rangel; KuoJen Tsao
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2018-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.