Furkan Dindaroğlu1, Servet Doğan1, Sonia Amado2, Ege Doğan1. 1. School of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. 2. Department of Experimental Psychology, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that there are differences between orthodontists, individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and laypersons in the visual perception of faces with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), the faces with UCLP and BCLP are visually perceived differently and the hierarchy of visual attention changes when viewing individuals with CLP. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Department of Orthodontics and Experimental Psychology at Ege University, İzmir. Sixty images (faces with a social smile and at rest) of 30 volunteers (unaffected controls, UCLP, BCLP) were viewed by 80 participants: orthodontists, individuals with CLP and laypersons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eye fixations on four areas of interest were quantified: eyes, nose, upper lip and lower lip-chin. Time to first fixation, fixation before, fixation count and fixation duration parameters were analysed. RESULTS: Orthodontists fixated on the upper-lip area more often than laypersons or individuals with CLP (F2.144 =8.47, P=.00, η²=.19 in faces at rest). The upper-lip area received more fixations (F2.144 =21.93, P=.00, η²=.23) and longer fixation durations (F2.144 =28.86, P=.00, η²=.27) from all participants who gazed on faces with UCLP and a social smile. CONCLUSION: The hypotheses of the study were supported. Orthodontists and laypersons focused more attention on the upper lip and eyes in the resting position, respectively. The upper-lip area of the BCLP images captured more attention at rest.
OBJECTIVES: To test the hypotheses that there are differences between orthodontists, individuals with cleft lip and palate (CLP) and laypersons in the visual perception of faces with unilateral (UCLP) and bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), the faces with UCLP and BCLP are visually perceived differently and the hierarchy of visual attention changes when viewing individuals with CLP. SETTING AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Department of Orthodontics and Experimental Psychology at Ege University, İzmir. Sixty images (faces with a social smile and at rest) of 30 volunteers (unaffected controls, UCLP, BCLP) were viewed by 80 participants: orthodontists, individuals with CLP and laypersons. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eye fixations on four areas of interest were quantified: eyes, nose, upper lip and lower lip-chin. Time to first fixation, fixation before, fixation count and fixation duration parameters were analysed. RESULTS: Orthodontists fixated on the upper-lip area more often than laypersons or individuals with CLP (F2.144 =8.47, P=.00, η²=.19 in faces at rest). The upper-lip area received more fixations (F2.144 =21.93, P=.00, η²=.23) and longer fixation durations (F2.144 =28.86, P=.00, η²=.27) from all participants who gazed on faces with UCLP and a social smile. CONCLUSION: The hypotheses of the study were supported. Orthodontists and laypersons focused more attention on the upper lip and eyes in the resting position, respectively. The upper-lip area of the BCLP images captured more attention at rest.
Authors: Shanique A Martin; Viren Patel; Shane D Morrison; David Kahn; Thomas Satterwhite; Rahim Nazerali Journal: Aesthetic Plast Surg Date: 2021-06-10 Impact factor: 2.326
Authors: A Quast; J Waschkau; J Saptschak; N Daratsianos; K Jordan; P Fromberger; J L Müller; P Meyer-Marcotty Journal: J Orofac Orthop Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 1.938
Authors: Jacob K Dey; Lisa E Ishii; Kofi D O Boahene; Patrick J Byrne; Masaru Ishii Journal: JAMA Facial Plast Surg Date: 2019-12-01 Impact factor: 4.611