Joshua S Frankel1, Thomas L Schwartz2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA. 2. Department of Psychiatry, SUNY Upstate Medical University, 750 E. Adams Street, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Brexpiprazole and cariprazine are the latest US Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotics available in the United States. Both function as partial agonists of the dopamine-2 receptor (D2R), a mechanism of action shared with aripiprazole. However, all three differ in their affinities for the D2R as well as for serotonin receptors (5-HTRs). This paper seeks to delineate these pharmacodynamic and clinical differences amongst the three dopamine partial agonist atypical antipsychotic drugs. METHODS: PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov searches were used to generate preclinical and clinical evidence for review. Data derived from animal models and human subjects were used to provide insight on clinical mechanisms and adverse effect potentials. Clinical trial data were reviewed to compare clinical efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: Efficacies among the three drugs are comparable for their shared indications. Side-effect profile and underlying pharmacodynamic mechanism of action for each drug may differ. CONCLUSION: Partial agonism of the D2R is a similarity of the three drugs reviewed. Each drug varies in affinity for both the D2R and a diverse group of 5-HTRs, generating a distinct profile of clinical indications and adverse effects for each.
BACKGROUND:Brexpiprazole and cariprazine are the latest US Food and Drug Administration approved atypical antipsychotics available in the United States. Both function as partial agonists of the dopamine-2 receptor (D2R), a mechanism of action shared with aripiprazole. However, all three differ in their affinities for the D2R as well as for serotonin receptors (5-HTRs). This paper seeks to delineate these pharmacodynamic and clinical differences amongst the three dopamine partial agonist atypical antipsychotic drugs. METHODS: PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov searches were used to generate preclinical and clinical evidence for review. Data derived from animal models and human subjects were used to provide insight on clinical mechanisms and adverse effect potentials. Clinical trial data were reviewed to compare clinical efficacy and adverse effects. RESULTS: Efficacies among the three drugs are comparable for their shared indications. Side-effect profile and underlying pharmacodynamic mechanism of action for each drug may differ. CONCLUSION: Partial agonism of the D2R is a similarity of the three drugs reviewed. Each drug varies in affinity for both the D2R and a diverse group of 5-HTRs, generating a distinct profile of clinical indications and adverse effects for each.
Authors: Andrew J Cutler; Ronald N Marcus; Sterling A Hardy; Amy O'Donnell; William H Carson; Robert D McQuade Journal: CNS Spectr Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 3.790
Authors: Robert L Findling; Christoph U Correll; Margaretta Nyilas; Robert A Forbes; Robert D McQuade; Na Jin; Svetlana Ivanova; Raymond Mankoski; William H Carson; Gabrielle A Carlson Journal: Bipolar Disord Date: 2013-03 Impact factor: 6.744
Authors: Suresh Durgam; Andrew J Cutler; Kaifeng Lu; Raffaele Migliore; Adam Ruth; István Laszlovszky; György Németh; Herbert Y Meltzer Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Gary S Sachs; William M Greenberg; Anju Starace; Kaifeng Lu; Adam Ruth; István Laszlovszky; György Németh; Suresh Durgam Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2014-11-24 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Herbert Y Meltzer; Robert Risinger; Henry A Nasrallah; Yangchun Du; Jacqueline Zummo; Lisa Corey; Anjana Bose; Srdjan Stankovic; Bernard L Silverman; Elliot W Ehrich Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Gary Sachs; Raymond Sanchez; Ronald Marcus; Elyse Stock; Robert McQuade; William Carson; Neveen Abou-Gharbia; Cheryl Impellizzeri; Stephen Kaplita; Linda Rollin; Taro Iwamoto Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2006-01-09 Impact factor: 4.153
Authors: Robert M Berman; Ronald N Marcus; René Swanink; Robert D McQuade; William H Carson; Patricia K Corey-Lisle; Arif Khan Journal: J Clin Psychiatry Date: 2007-06 Impact factor: 4.384
Authors: Ronald N Marcus; Randall Owen; Lisa Kamen; George Manos; Robert D McQuade; William H Carson; Michael G Aman Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Marianne O Klein; Daniella S Battagello; Ariel R Cardoso; David N Hauser; Jackson C Bittencourt; Ricardo G Correa Journal: Cell Mol Neurobiol Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 5.046
Authors: Jacek Stefanowicz; Tomasz Słowiński; Martyna Z Wróbel; Grzegorz Ślifirski; Maciej Dawidowski; Zdzisława Stefanowicz; Magdalena Jastrzębska-Więsek; Anna Partyka; Anna Wesołowska; Jadwiga Turło Journal: Med Chem Res Date: 2018-06-22 Impact factor: 1.965
Authors: Amber N Edinoff; Natalie W Wu; Benjamin S Maxey; Amy L Ren; Kenna N Leethy; Brook Girma; Amira Odisho; Jessica S Kaye; Aaron J Kaye; Adam M Kaye; Alan D Kaye; George Mychaskiw; Omar Viswanath; Ivan Urits Journal: Psychopharmacol Bull Date: 2021-03-16