Ming-Szu Hung1, I-Chuan Chen2, Paul-Yann Lin3, Jr-Hau Lung4, Ya-Chin Li4, Yu-Ching Lin1, Cheng-Ta Yang5, Ying-Huang Tsai6. 1. Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzih, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan, R.O.C.; Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan, R.O.C.; Department of Respiratory Care, Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chiayi Campus, Puzih, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan, R.O.C. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzih, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan, R.O.C. 3. Department of Anatomic Pathology, Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Chiayi 62247, Taiwan, R.O.C. 4. Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzih, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan, R.O.C. 5. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan, R.O.C.; Department of Respiratory Care, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan, R.O.C. 6. Division of Thoracic Oncology, Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Puzih, Chiayi 61363, Taiwan, R.O.C.; Department of Respiratory Care, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Abstract
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation has been demonstrated to have a critical role in tumor angiogenesis. In the present study, the correlation between EGFR mutations and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was investigated in lung cancer cell lines and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor tissues. VEGF levels were significantly increased in culture medium of lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues with EGFR mutations (H1650 vs. A549, P=0.0399; H1975 vs. A549, P<0.0001). Stable lung cancer cell lines expressing mutant (exon 19 deletion, E746-A750; exon 21 missense mutation, L858R) and wild-type EGFR genes were established. Significantly increased expression of VEGF and stronger inhibitory effects of gefitinib to VEGF expression were observed in exon 19 deletion stable lung cancer cells (exon 19 deletion vs. wild-type EGFR, P=0.0005). The results of the present study may provide an insight into the association of mutant EGFR and VEGF expression in lung cancer, and may assist with further development of targeted therapy for NSCLC in the future.
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activation has been demonstrated to have a critical role in tumor angiogenesis. In the present study, the correlation between EGFR mutations and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) was investigated in lung cancer cell lines and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumor tissues. VEGF levels were significantly increased in culture medium of lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues with EGFR mutations (H1650 vs. A549, P=0.0399; H1975 vs. A549, P<0.0001). Stable lung cancer cell lines expressing mutant (exon 19 deletion, E746-A750; exon 21 missense mutation, L858R) and wild-type EGFR genes were established. Significantly increased expression of VEGF and stronger inhibitory effects of gefitinib to VEGFexpression were observed in exon 19 deletion stable lung cancer cells (exon 19 deletion vs. wild-type EGFR, P=0.0005). The results of the present study may provide an insight into the association of mutant EGFR and VEGFexpression in lung cancer, and may assist with further development of targeted therapy for NSCLC in the future.
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is an attractive target for anticancer therapy, as EGFR signaling is a pathway that has a significant role in the growth, proliferation and survival of numerous solid tumors, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (1). Gefitinib (Iressa®, also known as ZD1839; AstraZeneca, London, UK), a synthetic anilinoquin- azoline and adenosine triphosphate (ATP) mimetic, is the first commercially available EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI). Administered orally, gefitinib competes with ATP for the tyrosine kinase binding site on the EGFR and the resulting inhibition of autophosphorylation blocks downstream signaling (2). Gefitinib has minimal adverse effects, but tumor responses are observed in only 10–19 % of patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced NSCLC (3). However, a subgroup of patients with NSCLC possessing specific mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the EGFR gene, which correlates with favorable clinical responsiveness to gefitinib therapy, has been noted (3). All mutations appear to be limited to exons 18, 19, 20 and 21 of the EGFR gene (4). Missense mutations in exon 21 (L858R) and in-frame deletions within exon 19 (delE746-A750) have been shown to be the most frequent EGFR-TKI sensitive mutations (80%) in NSCLC (5,6).EGFR activation has been shown to be associated with the stimulation of tumor angiogenesis, and angiogenesis is essential to growth, proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells (7–14). The EGFR ligands, EGF and transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, demonstrated angiogenic properties. Expression of EGFR has been reported to be associated with the expression of angiogenic factors, such as TGF-α and VEGF in humancancers (7,15). Activation of EGFR by EGF and TGF-α also upregulated VEGFexpression in humancancer cell lines (8,9). Gefitinib, which blocked the EGFR signaling pathway via inhibition of phosphorylated AKT, was reported to exert anti-angiogenic effects by blocking EGF induced upregulation of VEGF and interleukin (IL)-8 in humancancer cell lines (10). Treatment of several EGFR/TGF-α-coexpressing tumor cell lines with gefitinib also resulted in growth inhibition that was accompanied by a decreased production of VEGF, basic EGF and TGF-α (11). The above data suggest that the EGFR signaling pathway modulates angiogenesis by way of upregulation of VEGF or other key angiogenic factors. VEGF is a key stimulator of angiogenesis, which induces proliferation, differentiation and migration of endothelial cells (12). VEGF also increases the vascular permeability and induces the production of proteases involved in the modification of the extracellular matrix (12). In NSCLCpatients, high serum VEGF level is associated with increasing intratumoral angiogenesis and poor prognosis (13). As the mutations in EGFR may lead to increased growth factor signaling, the present study hypothesized that NSCLC with EGFR mutations may have more potential in induction of angiogenesis. However, the association of EGFR mutations and the activities of angiogenic factors in lung cancer have not been previously studied to the best of our knowledge.In the present study, the association of VEGFexpression with EGFR mutation was investigated in lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues. Lung cancer cell lines stably transfected with wild-type and mutant EGFR genes were also established. VEGFexpression and inhibitory effects of gefitinib to VEGFexpression were also evaluated in these cells.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The NSCLC cell lines A549 (ATCC CCL-185), H460 (ATCC HTB-177), H1650 (ATCC CRL-5883) and H1975 (ATCC CRL-5908) were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). H1650 and H1975 cell lines have EGFR mutations (delE746-A750 for H1650; L858R and T790 M for H1975) (14). Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs; H-UV001) were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center (Hsinchu City, Taiwan). Cells were grown in complete growth medium [Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland) for A549 and H460 cells; RPMI-1640 media (Lonza) for H1650 and H1975 cells] supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA), 30 ng/ml EGF (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), 10 U/ml penicillin and 10 µg/ml streptomycin at 37°C and 5% CO2. Cells were incubated for 72 h and the supernatant of growth medium was collected for detection of VEGF levels. HUVECs were grown in 90% Medium 199 (Lonza) with 25 U/ml heparin (Lonza) and 30 µg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (Lonza), adjusted to contain 1.5 g/l sodium bicarbonate, 10 U/ml penicillin and 10 µg/ml streptomycin, as well as 10% fetal calf serum. Gefitinib and G418 were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (EMD Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA).
Tissues
Thirty-two NSCLC tissue samples were obtained from NSCLCpatients undergoing surgical resection of the primary tumor between July 2006 and May 2009, after approval from the Institutional Review Board at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (IRB nos. 100-1405B and 103-6693C1) and patients' signed consent were obtained. All tissue samples were requested from the tissue bank of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples were converted into tissue microarray (TMA) blocks using an AutoTiss 1000 arrayer (EverBio Technology, Inc., New Taipei City, Taiwan). The quality of the TMA slides was confirmed by the pathologist using hematoxylin- and eosin-stained slides.
DNA extraction and EGFR mutation analysis
DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tumors using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue kit (Qiagen GmbH, Hilden, Germany). A high sensitivity OncoFOCUS™ Panel version 1.0 developed by Sequenom (San Diego, CA, USA) was used for EGFR mutation analysis with the mass-spectroscopy based MassArray device (16).
RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen GmbH) from cell pellets according to the manufacturers' protocol. Total RNA was then reverse transcribed to cDNA using the iScript™ cDNA Synthesis kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). A total of 2 µl of reverse-transcribed cDNA was subjected to RT-PCR using iQ™ SYBR® Green supermix at a total volume of 20 µl and the Bio-Rad CFX96™ quantitative PCR system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany). The following primers were used for PCR: VEGF, 5′-TTCTGCTGTCTTGGGTGCATTGG-3′ (sense) and 5′-ATCTCTCCTATGTGCTGGCCTT-3′ (antisense) (17); and β-actin, 5′-CCTGGACTTCGAGCAAGAGATG-3′ (sense) and 5′-AGGAAGGAAGGCTGGAAGAGTG-3′ (antisense). A typical protocol included a 95°C denaturation step for 3 min followed by 35 cycles with 95°C denaturation for 20 sec, 60.3°C annealing and extension for 30 sec. Detection of the fluorescent product was performed at the extension step using a PCR machine. Melting curve detection and analysis were performed by an additional 80 cycles with a 55°C denaturation, with a 0.5°C increase following each cycle. Finally, the RT-PCR products were kept at 4°C. Relative VEGFexpression was analyzed by the 2−ΔΔCq method, using β-actin as the internal control (18).
Establishment of lung cancer stable cell lines expressing wild-type and mutant EGFR genes
Mutant EGFR genes (L858R and Del E746-A750) were generated by site-directed mutagenesis with specific primers from an expression vector harboring EGFR cDNA (pUSEAmpEGFRWt) (Upstate Biotechnology, Charlottesville, VA, USA). The following primers were used for site-directed mutagenesis: L858R, 5′-GATCACAGATTTTGGGCGGGCCAAACTGCTGGG-3′ (sense) and 5′-CCCAGCAGTTTGGCCCGCCCAAAATCTGTGATC-3′ (antisense); and Del E746-A750, 5′-CCCGTCGCTATCAAAACATCTCCGAAAGCC-3′ (sense) and 5′-GGCTTTCGGAGATGTTTTGATAGCGACGGG-3′ (antisense). A QuikChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis kit (Stratagene California, San Diego, CA, USA) was used for site-directed mutagenesis according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were transfected with expression vectors using Lipofectamine® 2000 reagent (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's protocol. A total of 48 h post transfection, cells were selected in G418 for 4 weeks, and cell colonies were selected and amplified for further studies.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of VEGF
The levels of VEGF in cell culture media were measured using a commercially available VEGF ELISA kit (HumanVEGF ELISA kit; Biosource International, Inc., Camarillo, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The limits of sensitivity were 5 pg/ml for VEGF.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues were cut into 4-µm sections, mounted on slides, deparaffinized with xylene and dehydrated using a gradient ethanol series. Stable lung cancer cells were cultured in a Nunc Lab-Tek™ II-Chamber Slide system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.), and subsequently fixed with formalin for further IHC study. Antigen retrieval was performed with citric acid (pH 6.0) at 97°C for 30 min, followed by treatment with 3% hydrogen peroxide. The slides were incubated overnight at 4°C with antibodies against VEGF. The rabbit polyclonal VEGF antibody (catalog no., sc-152; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) was used as primary antibody at a 1:50 dilution in TBS with 1% BSA. Following TBST washes, endogenous peroxidase activity was then quenched with 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in TBS. Mouse and rabbit specific HRP/DAB (ABC) detection IHC kit (catalog no., ab64264; Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) was then used according to the manufacturer's protocol. Detection was achieved using a biotinylated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (dilution, 1:1000; catalog no., ab6720; Abcam) and DAB chromogen. The sections were counterstained with hematoxylin before being mounted with organic media and glass slides. The IHC data for the specimens were assessed using the semi-quantitative immunoreactive score (IRS). The IRS was calculated by multiplying the staining intensity (0=no staining, 1=weak staining, 2=moderate staining and 3=strong staining) by the percentage of positively stained cells (0=0% of cells stained, 1=<10% of cells stained, 2=11–50% of cells stained, 3=51–80% of cells stained and 4=>81% of cells stained).
Protein extraction and western blot analysis
Whole cell proteins were extracted from lung cancer cells using M-PER Mammalian Protein Extraction Reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) with Phosphatase Inhibitor Cocktail Set II (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) and Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer's protocols. In total, 40 µg protein were separated on 8% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (EMD Millipore). Membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against EGFR (catalog no., 2232; dilution, 1:500) phospho-EGFR (Tyr1068) (catalog no., 2220; dilution, 1:500) (both from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA), β-actin (catalog no., A5441; dilution, 1:1,000) (Sigma-Aldrich; EMD Millipore), Akt (catalog no., sc-8312; dilution, 1:500), phospho-Akt (Ser473) (catalog no., sc-33437; dilution, 1:500), and γ-tubulin (catalog no., sc-12881; dilution, 1:1,000) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Dallas, TX, USA) at 4°C overnight. Subsequently, primary antibody and antigen complexes were bound to specific HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies [anti-rabbit (catalog no., sc-2340; dilution, 1:5,000), anti-goat (catalog no., sc-2953; 1:10,000), and anti-mouse (catalog no., sc-2371; dilution, 1:2,000) (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.)] at room temperature for 1 h. An enhanced chemiluminescence blotting analysis system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA) was used for antigen-antibody detection. The density of western blot bands was semi-quantified by ImageJ software (version 1.46; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Transwell co-culture assay
HUVECs (3×104) were cultured in 35-mm 6 well dual-layered culture dishes at 37°C. After 24 h, wild-type and mutant EGFR transfected cells (5×104) were seeded onto the cell culture insert with 0.4-µm micropores on the bottom (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and placed in the wells growing HUVECs. HUVECs were collected on day 5 following co-culturing, and viable cells were then counted with a hemocytometer.
Statistical analysis
The Student's t-test was used to compare VEGFexpression in various groups of samples. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 10.0; SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered to indicate a significant difference, with two-sided analysis. All experiments were performed in triplicate.
Results
EGFR mutations and VEGF expression in lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues
The association between EGFR mutations and VEGFexpression was detected in lung cancer cell lines. VEGF levels in the culture media of lung cancer cell lines with mutant (H1975 and H1650) and wild-type EGFR (A549 and H460) were measured by ELISA (Fig. 1A). Significantly increased VEGF levels were noted in H1975 and H1650 lung cancer cell lines compared to the A549 cell line (Fig. 1A).
Figure 1.
(A) VEGF levels secreted from cell lines with EGFR mutations (H1975 and H1650) and wild-type EGFR (A549 and H460). VEGF was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay as described previously. VEGF values are normalized to total cell numbers. Values are expressed as the means ± SD of triplicate experiments. (B) VEGF expression was determined by immunohistochemical staining in mutant and wild-type non-small cell lung cancer tissues. The expression of VEGF was quantified by IRS and values are expressed as the mean ± SD. Representative pictures for VEGF expression in EGFR mutant and wild-type non-small cell lung cancer tissues are also shown. EGFR M-, wild-type EGFR; EGFR M+, mutant EGFR. Magnification, ×200. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; SD, standard deviation; URS, immunoreactive score.
EGFR mutation statuses were analyzed in 32 NSCLC tissue samples. EGFR mutations were detected in 14 (41.6%) samples, including 5 exon 21 L858R, 5 exon 19 deletions, 2 exon 21 L861Q and 1 exon 20 insertion mutation. Expression of VEGF was subsequently detected using IHC staining. Significantly increased expression of VEGF was noted in lung cancer tissues with EGFR mutations (Fig. 1B).
Establishment of lung cancer stable cells expressing wild-type and mutant EGFR genes
To further validate the association of mutant EGFR and expression of VEGF in an isogenic background, stable lung cancer cell lines expressing wild-type and mutant EGFR genes were subsequently established. A549 lung cancer cells were transfected with vectors containing wild-type and mutant EGFR genes. Following selection with G418, resistant cell colonies were selected and amplified. EGFRexpression in cell colonies was detected by western blot analysis (Fig. 2A). Colonies with overexpression of EGFR were subsequently pooled and amplified for further analysis. Compared to wild-type EGFR gene transfected cells, increased expression of EGFR and phosphor-Akt proteins following EGF stimulation were detected in mutant EGFR gene transfected A549 lung cancer stable cells (Fig. 2B).
Figure 2.
(A) Western blot analysis of EGFR and Akt expression/phosphorylation in EGFR transfected A549 stable cell lines. EGFR expression was normalized to the EV group using γ-tubulin as the internal control. (B) Western blot analysis of EGFR and Akt expression/phosphorylation in pooled EGFR transfected A549 stable cell lines with and without 100 ng/ml of EGF for 10 min following serum starvation for 48 h. L5 and L7 clones were pooled as L858R. D6 and D7 clones were pooled as DEL. EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EV, empty vector; WT, wild-type EGFR; L, L858R; D, DEL E746-A750; p, phophorylated.
EGFR mutations and expression of VEGF in lung cancer stable cells
The expression of VEGF mRNA and protein were detected in mutant and wild type EGFR gene transfected stable lung cancer cells. Significantly increased expression of VEGF mRNA was noted in stable cells transfected with exon 19 deletion (E746-A750) mutant EGFR gene compared to those transfected with empty vector, wild-type and exon 21 missense (L858R) EGFR genes (Fig. 3A). Expression of VEGF protein was also observed in mutant and wild-type EGFR gene transfected stable lung cancer cells. Increased expression of VEGF protein was noted in stable cells transfected with exon 19 deletion (E746-A750) mutant EGFR gene by western blot (Fig. 3B) and IHC (Fig. 3C and D) analysis.
Figure 3.
(A) Expression of VEGF mRNA in EGFR transfected A549 stable cells. (B) Western blot analysis of VEGF in EGFR transfected A549 stable cells. VEGF expression was normalized to the EV group using β-actin as the internal control. (C) IHC analysis of VEGF in EGFR transfected A549 stable cells. Magnification, ×200. (D) Intensities of IHC staining for VEGF were quantified. VEGF intensity values were normalized to the EV group. Values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation of six experiments. VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; EV, empty vector; IHC, immunohistochemical; WT: wild-type EGFR.
EGFR mutations and VEGF expression in lung cancer stable cells
Expression of VEGF in culture medium of EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cells with/without EGF stimulation was measured. Significantly increased VEGF levels were noted in stable cells transfected with exon 19 deletion (Del E746-A750) mutant EGFR gene compared to those transfected with wild-type EGFR gene (Fig. 4A). A Transwell co-culture system was subsequently used to evaluate the ability of mutant EGFR genes to promote HUVEC growth. HUVECs were co-cultured with EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cells in a Transwell system for 5 days. Significantly increased numbers of HUVECs were also noted in cells co-cultured with exon 21 missense (L858R) and exon 19 deletion (Del E746-A750) mutant EGFR genes (Fig. 4B).
Figure 4.
(A) Expression of VEGF in culture medium of EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cell lines with or without EGF (100 ng/ml) stimulation for 24 h was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Groups with gefitinib (20 µM) and EGF stimulation were also measured. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments normalized to cell numbers and subsequently normalized to the group of empty vector transfected cells without EGF stimulation. (B) HUVECs were co-cultured with EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cell lines in a Transwell system for 5 days. Cells in each group were counted. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments. (C) Inhibition effects of VEGF in culture medium with EGF (100 ng/ml) stimulation for 24 h were measured following gefitinib treatment. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate experiments normalized to each group of EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cell lines without gefitinib treatment. EV, Empty vector; WT, wild-type EGFR; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; SD, standard deviation; HUVECs, human umbilical vein endothelial cells; IRESSA, gefitinib.
EGFR mutations and angiogenesis in lung cancer stable cell lines
Inhibitory effects of gefitinib to VEGF in EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cells were also evaluated. Expression of VEGF in culture medium of EGFR transfected A549 stable lung cancer cells with EGF stimulation and gefitinib treatment was measured (Fig. 4C). Expression of VEGF following EGF stimulation was partially inhibited by gefitinib treatment. However, a significantly increased inhibition of VEGF was observed in stable cells transfected with exon 19 deletion (Del E746-A750) mutant EGFR gene (56%) compared to those transfected with empty vector (33.6%), wild-type EGFR (47.8%) and exon 21 missense (L858R) mutation (37.1%) genes (Fig. 4C).
Discussion
Association of EGFR mutations and VEGFexpression has been reported in lung cancer tissues (19). In the present study, it was additionally observed that increased expression of VEGF is associated with EGFR mutations in lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues. In order to elucidate these findings, stable lung cancer cell lines expressing exon 19 deletion (E746-A750), exon 21 missense (L858R) mutations and wild-type EGFR genes were established. Increased phosphorylation of EGFR and Akt were observed in stable lung cancer cell lines expressing exon 19 deletion (E746-A750) and exon 21 missense (L858R) mutations. It was observed that increased expression of VEGF is associated with overexpression of exon 19 deletion (E746-A750) EGFR gene and the expression of VEGF is inhibited by gefitinib, an EGFR-TKI. As a result, EGFR mutation may enhance VEGFexpression through increased phosphorylation of EGFR and Akt in lung cancer cells. Increased proliferation rate was also observed in HUVECs co-cultured with exon 19 deletion and (E746-A750) exon 21 missense (L858R) mutation stable lung cancer cells. Furthermore, it was observed that the expression of VEGF in stable lung cancer cells is inhibited by gefitinib, which demonstrated increased inhibitory effects to expression of VEGF in stable lung cancer cell lines expressing exon 19 deletion (E746-A750) mutation. EGFR-TKIs have been proposed to inhibit lung cancer cells through oncogenic shock by inhibiting phosphorylation of EGFR tyrokinase domain and downstream Akt signaling pathways (20). The results of the present study demonstrated that in addition to oncogenic shock, EGFR-TKIs may exert their effects through inhibition of VEGFexpression and angiogenesis in lung cancer cells.Both exon 19 deletion and exon 21 missense mutations are common EGFR mutations, and have been proven to be associated with a favorable response to gefitinib as well as other EGFR-TKIs, including erlotinib and afatinib (21–23). However, emerging evidence has suggested that exon 19 deletion mutation is associated with an improved outcome following afatinib therapy compared with exon 21 L858R mutation, which may suggest that these mutations have distinct features (22). In the present study, it was observed that exon 19 deletion mutation is associated with increased expression of VEGF. The expression of VEGF was inhibited by gefitinib in all lung cancer cells investigated. Notably, an increased inhibitory effect of gefitinib to the secretion of VEGF was observed in exon 19 deletion stable cells. As a result, the present study supports the finding that exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation have distinct features. The results of the present study demonstrated that lung cancer cells harboring exon 19 deletion EGFR mutation may exert increased expression of VEGF and angiogenesis ability. In addition, gefitinib, as well as other EGFR-TKIs, may have increased inhibitory effects on these cells.In the present study, both exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation cells were observed to promote proliferation of HUVECs. As a result, other angiogenic factors in addition to VEGF may be associated with EGFR mutations. For example, mutant EGFR was reported to activate the gp130/JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway by means of IL-6 upregulation in primary humanlung adenocarcinomas (24). In pancreatic cancer cells, inhibition of EGFR activation resulted in decreased expression of IL-8 (25). Taken together, mutant EGFR may contribute to the production of VEGF, IL-8, IL-6 and other angiogenic factors in lung cancer cells. The expression of VEGF was only partially inhibited by gefitinib in the present study, which implies that a combination of EGFR-TKI with anti-VEGF therapy may provide an improved response compared with EGFR-TKI treatment alone in lung cancer cells. This hypothesis is supported by a recent meta-analysis study, which demonstrated that the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, has an improved response compared with erlotinib treatment alone in advanced NSCLC (26). Further studies to investigate this hypothesis are ongoing in our laboratory.In summary, the present study demonstrated that mutant EGFR is associated with increased expression of VEGF in NSCLC cells and tissues. Exon 19 deletion mutation stable cells were observed to have increased expression of VEGF and to be more susceptible to EGFR-TKI inhibition of VEGFexpression. The results of the present study may provide an insight into the association between mutant EGFR and VEGFexpression in lung cancer, and lead to further development of combined anti-EGFR and anti-VEGF therapy for NSCLC in the future.
Authors: F Ciardiello; R Caputo; R Bianco; V Damiano; G Fontanini; S Cuccato; S De Placido; A R Bianco; G Tortora Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Caren C Bancroft; Zhong Chen; Jason Yeh; John B Sunwoo; Ning T Yeh; Sadhana Jackson; Chad Jackson; Carter Van Waes Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2002-06-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Lingzhi Hong; Whitney E Lewis; Monique Nilsson; Sonia Patel; Susan Varghese; Melvin J Rivera; Robyn R Du; Pingjun Chen; Haley N Kemp; Waree Rinsurongkawong; Simon Heeke; Amy R Spelman; Yasir Y Elamin; Marcelo V Negrao; Boris Sepesi; Don L Gibbons; J Jack Lee; Jia Wu; Natalie I Vokes; John V Heymach; Jianjun Zhang; Xiuning Le Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-07-17 Impact factor: 6.575