Literature DB >> 28100941

Outcomes of Laparoscopy Combined with Enhanced Recovery Pathway for Reversal of Hartmann's Procedure.

Liang Zhang1, Yong Zhong1, Hao Lin1, Lv Xiao-Peng1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study is to discuss the security and feasibility of the laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure (LRHP) on the concept of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS). The clinical data of 42 patients who underwent laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure was retrospectively analyzed, and the operative time, blood loss, intraoperative and postoperative complications, conversion to open surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and so on were observed. Twenty-nine patients (69.00 % of the study pool) received complete postoperative recovery courses as prescribed by enhanced recovery program (ERP). The postoperative length of stay (LOS) in the hospital was 5.6 (3-16 days). The overall and major (grades III to V) postoperative morbidities were 33.3 % (n = 14) and 4.8 % (n = 2), respectively. Our preliminary results showed that using the laparoscopic technology in reversal of Hartmann's colostomy on the concept of ERP is safe and feasible. Patients with intra- or postoperative complications were found to have statistically significant associations with greater risk of ERP failure.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enhanced recovery after surgery; Fast-tract recovery program; Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann’s procedure; Minimally invasive techniques

Year:  2015        PMID: 28100941      PMCID: PMC5218930          DOI: 10.1007/s12262-015-1402-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Surg        ISSN: 0973-9793            Impact factor:   0.656


  14 in total

1.  Pulmonary function after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  S Hasukić; D Mesić; E Dizdarević; D Keser; S Hadziselimović; M Bazardzanović
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Fast-track colonic surgery: status and perspectives.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Recent Results Cancer Res       Date:  2005

Review 4.  Anesthesiology national CME program and ASA activities in simulation.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Sinz
Journal:  Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2007-06

5.  Laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's rectosigmoidectomy.

Authors:  S Slawik; A R Dixon
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 6.  Resource use and postoperative outcome: basic elements in benchmarking.

Authors:  Minna Niskanen
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.687

7.  The utility of the Hartmann procedure.

Authors:  D C Desai; E J Brennan; J F Reilly; R D Smink
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Changing patterns in colostomy closure: the Bristol experience 1975-1982.

Authors:  M E Foster; D J Leaper; R C Williamson
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response.

Authors:  H I Hendolin; M E Pääkönen; E M Alhava; R Tarvainen; T Kemppinen; P Lahtinen
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  2000-05

10.  Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection.

Authors:  M Gatt; A D G Anderson; B S Reddy; P Hayward-Sampson; I C Tring; J MacFie
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  1 in total

1.  International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).

Authors: 
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.