| Literature DB >> 28100929 |
Marcel Koenigkam Santos1, Danilo Lemos Cruvinel2, Marcelo Bezerra de Menezes3, Sara Reis Teixeira4, Elcio de Oliveira Vianna5, Jorge Elias Júnior6, José Antonio Baddini Martinez5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a quantitative analysis of the airways using automated software, in computed tomography images of patients with cystic fibrosis, correlating the results with spirometric findings.Entities:
Keywords: Airway remodeling/physiology; Cystic fibrosis; Tomography, X-ray computed
Year: 2016 PMID: 28100929 PMCID: PMC5238409 DOI: 10.1590/0100-3984.2015.0145
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Radiol Bras ISSN: 0100-3984
Figure 1For obtaining airway measurements with the automated program, the first step is identification of the tracheal lumen (arrow), followed by segmentation (anatomical separation) of the tracheobronchial tree. A center line is calculated within the airway to identify the true axial plane of the bronchus, then the inner borders (dotted line) and outer borders (continuous line) are identified.
Spirometry results of CF patients.
| Tiffeneau index | FEV1 (L) | FEV1% | FVC (L) | FVC% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 0.71 ± 0.15 | 2.0 ± 1.8 | 71.3 ± 30.2 | 2.8 ± 1.0 | 81.5 ± 24.3 |
| Group I | 0.81 ± 0.9 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 90.6 ± 20.8 | 2.9 ± 1.0 | 95.7 ± 17.9 |
| Group II | 0.55 ± 0.7 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 40.1 ± 8.9 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 58.5 ± 12.8 |
FEV1, forced expiratory volume in first second; FEV1%, FEV1 in percentage of predicted; FVC, forced vital capacity; FVC%, FVC in percentage of predicted; Tiffeneau index, FEV1/FVC.
Only the values of FVC did not differ significantly different between groups I and II (p = 0.25).
Results of the quantitative analysis of airways on MDCT images of CF patients.
| Number of bronchi studied | Total diameter of the bronchus (mm) | Area of the lumen (mm2) | Mean wall thickness (mm) | Relative wall thickness (%) | RWT3-8 (%) | Maximum wall attenuation (UH) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| All patients | 52 ± 22 | 7.8 ± 0.9 | 8.8 ± 3.9 | 2.2 ± 0.2 | 83.3 ± 1.9 | 85.1 ± 2.0 | -375 ± 121 |
| Group I | 44 ± 17 | 7.6 ± 0.7 | 8.7 ± 3.6 | 2.2 ± 0.1 | 83.4 ± 2.3 | 85.0 ± 2.0 | -398 ± 138 |
| Group II | 64 ± 24 | 8.0 ± 1.2 | 8.9 ± 4.5 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 83.0 ± 1.2 | 85.2 ± 1.4 | -337 ± 79 |
RWT3-8, relative wall thickness of the third to eighth bronchial generation.
The only variable that showed statistically significant differences between groups I and II was the number of bronchi studied (p < 0.01).
Figure 2Examples of two CF patients, one from group I (A, FEV1% = 69.6) and another from group II (B, FEV1% = 34.5). Coronal CT scans with a lung window show greater bronchiectasis in the group II patient. The three-dimensional figures representing the automated bronchial segmentation illustrate that the number of bronchi found and analyzed was greater in the group II patient than in the group I patient (91 vs. 49).
Figure 3Graphic illustrating the correlation between the RWT3-8 measured by CT and the FEV1% in group I patients (R = -0.62; p < 0.01).
Correlation coefficients for comparisons between MDCT-acquired quantitative measurements of the airways and FEV1%.
| Correlation coefficient | ||
|---|---|---|
| Measure | Group I | Group II |
| Number of bronchi | -0.35 | 0.12 |
| Overall diameter | -0.03 | 0.05 |
| Area of the lumen | -0.06 | -0.16 |
| Wall thickness | -0.25 | 0.16 |
| Relative wall thickness | -0.27 | 0.22 |
| Relative wall thickness of the third to eight generation | -0.62 | 0.29 |
| Maximum wall attenuation | -0.23 | 0.21 |
The correlation between RWT3-8 and FEV1% was stronger in group I than in group II, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p < 0.01).