Literature DB >> 28100041

Contrasting growth forecasts across the geographical range of Scots pine due to altitudinal and latitudinal differences in climatic sensitivity.

Luis Matías1,2, Juan C Linares3, Ángela Sánchez-Miranda1, Alistair S Jump1,4.   

Abstract

Ongoing changes in global climate are altering ecological conditions for many species. The consequences of such changes are typically most evident at the edge of a species' geographical distribution, where differences in growth or population dynamics may result in range expansions or contractions. Understanding population responses to different climatic drivers along wide latitudinal and altitudinal gradients is necessary in order to gain a better understanding of plant responses to ongoing increases in global temperature and drought severity. We selected Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) as a model species to explore growth responses to climatic variability (seasonal temperature and precipitation) over the last century through dendrochronological methods. We developed linear models based on age, climate and previous growth to forecast growth trends up to year 2100 using climatic predictions. Populations were located at the treeline across a latitudinal gradient covering the northern, central and southernmost populations and across an altitudinal gradient at the southern edge of the distribution (treeline, medium and lower elevations). Radial growth was maximal at medium altitude and treeline of the southernmost populations. Temperature was the main factor controlling growth variability along the gradients, although the timing and strength of climatic variables affecting growth shifted with latitude and altitude. Predictive models forecast a general increase in Scots pine growth at treeline across the latitudinal distribution, with southern populations increasing growth up to year 2050, when it stabilizes. The highest responsiveness appeared at central latitude, and moderate growth increase is projected at the northern limit. Contrastingly, the model forecasted growth declines at lowland-southern populations, suggesting an upslope range displacement over the coming decades. Our results give insight into the geographical responses of tree species to climate change and demonstrate the importance of incorporating biogeographical variability into predictive models for an accurate prediction of species dynamics as climate changes.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Pinus sylvestriszzm321990; climate; dendrochronology; distribution; growth; modelling

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28100041     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13627

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  4 in total

1.  Growth and resilience responses of Scots pine to extreme droughts across Europe depend on predrought growth conditions.

Authors:  Arun K Bose; Arthur Gessler; Andreas Bolte; Alessandra Bottero; Allan Buras; Maxime Cailleret; J Julio Camarero; Matthias Haeni; Ana-Maria Hereş; Andrea Hevia; Mathieu Lévesque; Juan C Linares; Jordi Martinez-Vilalta; Luis Matías; Annette Menzel; Raúl Sánchez-Salguero; Matthias Saurer; Michel Vennetier; Daniel Ziche; Andreas Rigling
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 10.863

2.  Large apparent growth increases in boreal forests inferred from tree-rings are an artefact of sampling biases.

Authors:  Louis Duchesne; Daniel Houle; Rock Ouimet; Liam Caldwell; Manuel Gloor; Roel Brienen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Mass-ratio and complementarity effects simultaneously drive aboveground biomass in temperate Quercus forests through stand structure.

Authors:  Wen-Qiang Gao; Xiang-Dong Lei; Dong-Li Gao; Yu-Tang Li
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Predictive modelling of the distribution of Clematis sect. Fruticella s. str. under climate change reveals a range expansion during the Last Glacial Maximum.

Authors:  Mingyu Li; Jian He; Zhe Zhao; Rudan Lyu; Min Yao; Jin Cheng; Lei Xie
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.